Skip to main content
Log in

Improvement of collaborative optimization

  • Published:
Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a new improved collaborative optimization (CO) model that provides solution capabilities for multiobjective multidisciplinary optimization problems. Reasons that cause computational difficulties in CO algorithm are firstly analyzed. Then a new system level objective function is advised to minimize relative value between the collaborative objective function and single disciplinary objective function. And it eliminates the effect of dimensions and magnitude orders among objectives. A new subsystem level objective function is developed that includes the disciplinary objective function and the consistency constraint. A new CO framework which is more suitable for multilevel distributed design is advised. In this CO framework, the system level optimizer does not only independently invoke the subdisciplinary analysis tools, but also invoke its subdiscipline optimizer. The improved CO model proposed in this work is demonstrated with two examples. The results of examples show the improved CO is not only feasible, reliable and efficient, but also well suitable to solve the multiobjective optimization problems in multidisciplinary design environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ilan K, Valerie M. Collaborative optimization: Status and directions [C]//The 8th AIAA/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization. Long Beach, CA: AIAA, 2000: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jun S, Jeon Y, Rho J, et al. Application of collaborative optimization using response surface methodology to an aircraft wing design [C]//The 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. Albany, New York: AIAA, 2004: AIAA-2004-4442.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Budianto I A, Olds J R. Design and deployment of a satellite constellation using collaborative optimization [J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2004, 41(6): 956–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alexandrov N M, Lewis R M. Analytical and computational aspects of collaborative optimization for multidisciplinary design [J]. AIAA Journal, 2002, 40(2): 301–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin J G. Analysis and enhancement of collaborative optimization for multidisciplinary design [J]. AIAA Journal, 2004, 42(2): 348–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li Xiang, Li Wei-ji, Liu Chang-an. Geometric analysis of collaborative optimization [J]. Structutal Multidiscipline Optimization, 2008, 35(4): 301–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zadeh P M, Toropov V V, Wood A S. Use of global approximations in the collaborative optimization framework [C]// The 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. Albany, New York: AIAA, 2004: AIAA-2004-4654.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Azarm S, Li W C. Multi-level design optimization using global monotonicity analysis [J]. Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions and Automation in Design, 1989, 111(2): 259–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hai-yan Huang  (黄海燕).

Additional information

Foundation item: the Knowledge-based Ship-design Hyper-integrated Platform (KSHIP) of Ministry of Education and Finance of China (No. 200512)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, Hy., Wang, Dy. Improvement of collaborative optimization. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 15, 172–177 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-010-8121-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-010-8121-y

Key words

CLC number

Navigation