Skip to main content
Log in

Using the implantable electrical stimulator for peripheral nerve rehabilitation: A study in an animal model

  • Published:
Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study presents a peripheral nerve injury animal model for evaluation of an implantable electrical stimulator we designed. The evaluation was confirmed by ethological, electrophysiological and histologic study. Twenty New Zealand rabbits were used. The left sciatic nerve was crushed with a micro-vessel clamp in all rabbits, and the stimulators were implanted in ten rabbits. The other ten rabbits were in a control group. As compared with the implantation group, 3 and 6 weeks after operation, the histology showed the typical pathologic atrophy by hematoxylin-eosin (HE), the motor nerve conduction velocity (MCV) was found significantly slowed and the axon of crushed nerve at distal portion exhibited breakdown in the control group. These results reveal that the implantable electrical stimulator was effective and was suitable for implantation in an animal model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. English A W, Schwartz G, Meador W, et al. Electrical stimulation promotes peripheral axon regeneration by enhanced neuronal neurotrophin signaling [J]. Dev Neurobiol, 2007, 67(2): 158–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Geremia N M, Gordon T, Brushart T M, et al. Electrical stimulation promotes sensory neuron regeneration and growth-associated gene expression [J]. Exp Neurol, 2007, 205(2): 347–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang Z, Rouabhia M, Wang Z, et al. Electrically conductive biodegradable polymer composite for nerve regeneration: electricity-stimulated neurite outgrowth and axon regeneration [J]. Artif Organs, 2007, 31(1): 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yamada M, Tanemura K, Okada S, et al. Electrical stimulation modulates fate determination of differentiating embryonic stem cells [J]. Stem Cells, 2007, 25(3): 562–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zealear D L, Rodriguez R J, Kenny T, et al. Electrical stimulation of a denervated muscle promotes selective reinnervation by native over foreign motoneurons [J]. J Neurophysiol, 2002, 87(4): 2195–2199.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Al-Majed A A, Tam S L, Gordon T. Electrical stimulation accelerates and enhances expression of regeneration-associated genes in regenerating rat femoral motoneurons [J]. Cell Mol Neurobiol, 2004, 24(3): 379–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Meissner W, Gross C E, Harnack D, et al. Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: Potential risk of tissue damage associated with external stimulation [J]. Ann Neurol, 2004, 55(3): 449–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chiou Y H, Luh J J, Chen S C, et al. Patient-driven loop control for hand function restoration in a non-invasive functional electrical stimulation system [J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2008, 30(19): 1499–1505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lundborg G. A 25-year perspective of peripheral nerve surgery: Evolving neuroscientific concepts and clinical significance [J]. J Hand Surg [Am], 2000, 25(3): 391–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Naff N J, Ecklund J M. History of peripheral nerve surgery techniques [J]. Neurosurg Clin North Am, 2001, 12(1): 197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dvali L, Mackinnon S E. Nerve repair, grafting, and nerve transfers [J]. Clin Plast Surg, 2003, 30(2): 203–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tong K C, Lo S K, Cheing G L. Alternating frequencies of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation: Does it produce greater analgesic effects on mechanical and thermal pain thresholds [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2007, 88(10): 1344–1349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Malm-Buatsi E, Nepple K G, Boyt M A, et al. Efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in children with overactive bladder refractory to pharmacotherapy [J]. Urology, 2007, 70(5): 980–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Robaina F, Clavo B. Spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of post-stroke patients: Current state and future directions [J]. Acta Neurochir Suppl, 2007, 97(Sup 1): 277–282.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hamid S, Hayek R. Role of electrical stimulation for rehabilitation and regeneration after spinal cord injury: An overview [J]. Eur Spine J, 2008, 17(9): 1256–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamani C, Schwalb J M, Rezai A R, et al. Deep brain stimulation for chronic neuropathic pain: Long-term outcome and the incidence of insertional effect [J]. Pain, 2006, 25(1–2): 188–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Beer G M, Steurer J, Meyer V E. Standardizing nerve crushes with a non-serrated clamp [J]. J Reconstr Microsurg, 2001, 17(7): 531–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Varejao A S, Cabrita A M, Meek M F, et al. Functional and morphological assessment of a standardized rat sciatic nerve crush injury with a non-serrated clamp [J]. J Neurotrauma, 2004, 21(11): 1652–1670.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bing-fang Zeng  (曾炳芳).

Additional information

Foundation item: the Shanghai-Philips Research & Development Fund of China (No. 06SP07001) and Shanghai Rising-Star Program (No. 08QH14015)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rui, By., Zeng, Bf., Wang, Jw. et al. Using the implantable electrical stimulator for peripheral nerve rehabilitation: A study in an animal model. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 14, 635–640 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-009-0635-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-009-0635-9

Key words

CLC number

Navigation