Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of GTN damage models for sheet metal forming

  • Published:
Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman (GTN) damage model was developed basing on anisotropic yield criterion to predict the damage evolution for anisotropic voided ductile materials. Hill’s quadratic anisotropic yield criterion (1948) and Barlat’s 3-component anisotropic yield criterion (1989) were used to describe the anisotropy of the matrix. User defined subroutines were developed using the above models. Taking the benchmark of NUMISHEET’93 square cup deep drawing as an example, the effect of matrix plastic anisotropy on a ductile material was studied. The predicted result by Barlat’89-GTN model has a better agreement with the experimental data than that by Hill’48-GTN and the original GTN model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miller W S, Zhuang L, Bottema J, et al. Recent development in aluminium alloys for the automotive industry [J]. Materials Science and Engineering A-Structural Materials Properties Microstructure and Processing, 2000, 280(1): 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen Z T, Worswick M J, Pilkey A K, et al. Damage percolation during stretch flange forming of aluminum alloy sheet [J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2005, 53(12): 2692–2717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lievers W B, Pilkey A K, Lloyd D J. The influence of iron content on the bendability of AA6111 sheet [J]. Materials Science and Engineering A-Structural Materials Properties Microstructure and Processing, 2003, 361(1–2): 312–320.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gurson A L. Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: part I — Yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media [J]. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology-Transactions of the ASME, 1977, 99: 2–15.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang D A, Chien W Y, Liao K C. A Gurson yield function for anisotropic porous sheet metals and its applications to failure prediction of aluminum sheets [J]. The Chinese Journal of Mechanics-Series A, 2003, 19(1): 161–168.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Tvergaard V, Influence of voids on shear band instabilities under plane strain conditions [J]. International Journal of Fracture, 1981, 17: 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tvergaard V, On localization in ductile materials containing spherical voids [J]. International Journal of Fracture, 1982, 18: 237–252.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liao K C, Pan J, Tang S C. Approximate yield criteria for anisotropic porous ductile sheet metals [J]. Mechanics of Materials, 1997, 26: 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Doege E, El-Dsoki T, Seibert D. Prediction of necking and wrinkling in sheet-metal forming [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 1995, 50(1–4): 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brunet M, Morestin F. Experimental and analytical necking studies of anisotropic sheet metals [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2001, 112(2–3):214–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Prat F, Grange M, Besson J, et al. Behavior and rupture of hydrided ZIRCALOY-4 tubes and sheets [J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 1998, 29A(6): 1643–1651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen B, Wu P D. Multiscale Deformation and Fracture in Materials and Structures [C]//The James R. Rice 60th Anniversary. [s.l.]: Kluwer Academic, 2000: 17–30.

  13. Barlat F, Lege D J, Brem J C. A six-component yield function for anisotropic materials [J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 1991, 7: 693–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hill R. The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity [M]. London: Oxford University Press, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barlat F, Lian J. Plastic behavior and stretchability of sheet metals. Part I: A yield function for orthotropic sheets under plane stress conditions [J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 1989, 5: 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tvergaard V, Needleman A. Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile test bar [J]. Acta Metall, 1984, 32: 157–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Needleman A, Tvergaard V. An analysis of ductile rupture in notched bars [J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1984, 32: 461–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chu C C, Needleman A. Void nucleation effects in biaxially stretched sheets [J]. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology-Transactions of the ASME, 1980, 102: 249–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Aravas N. On the numerical integration of a class of pressure-dependent plasticity models [J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1987, 24: 1395–1416.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Simo J C, Hughes T J R. Computational Inelasticity [M]. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lievers W B, Pilkey A K, Lloyd D J. Using incremental forming to calibrate a void nucleation model for automotive aluminum sheet alloys [J]. Acta Materialia, 2004, 52: 3001–3007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Danckert J. Experimental investigation of a square-cup deep-drawing process [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 1995, 50: 375–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhi-ying Chen  (돂횾펢).

Additional information

Foundation item: the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 50575143)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, Zy., Dong, Xh. Comparison of GTN damage models for sheet metal forming. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 13, 739–743 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-008-0739-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-008-0739-7

Key words

CLC number

Navigation