Skip to main content
Log in

Ship appearance optimal design on RCS reduction using response surface method and genetic algorithms

  • Published:
Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Radar cross section (RCS) reduction technologies are very important in survivability of the military naval vessels. Ship appearance shaping as an effective countermeasure of RCS reduction redirects the scattered energy from one angular region of interest in space to another region of little interest. To decrease the scattering electromagnetic signals from ship scientifically, optimization methods should be introduced in shaping design. Based on the assumption of the characteristic section design method, mathematical formulations for optimal shaping design were established. Because of the computation-intensive analysis and singularity in shaping optimization, the response surface method (RSM) combined genetic algorithm (GA) was proposed. The polynomial response surface method was adopted in model approximation. Then genetic algorithms were employed to solve the surrogate optimization problem. By comparison RCS of the conventional and the optimal design, the superiority and effectiveness of proposed design methodology were verified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. George James L. History of warships [M]. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kotte E, Shaeffer J. Radar cross section [M]. 2nd ed. Boston: Artech Housing Inc, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andersh D, Moore J, Kosanovich S. Xpatch 4: the next generation in high frequency electromagnetic modeling and simulation software [C]//IEEE International Radar Conference. Alexandria Virginia: IEEE, 2000: 844–849.

    Google Scholar 

  4. van Tonder Johannes J, Jakobus U. Fast multipole solution of metallic and dielectric scattering problems in FEKO [C]//2005 IEEE/ACES International Conference on Wireless Communications and Applied Computational Electromagnetics. [s.l.]: IEEE, 2005: 513–516.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Box G P, Hunter J S. Multifactor experimental designs for exploring response surfaces [J]. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1957, 28: 194–241.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Harrison P N, Le Riche R, Haftka R T. Design of stiffened composite panels by genetic algorithms and response surface approximations [C]//AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS /ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Mater. Conf. New Orleans, LA: AIAA, 1995: 58–68.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang G, Dong Z, Aitcheson P. Adaptive response surface method: a global optimization scheme for approximation-based design problems [J]. Journal of Engineering Optimization, 2001, 33(6): 707–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bramantia A, Barbaa P, Farina M, et al. Combining response surfaces and evolutionary strategies for multiobjective pareto optimization in electromagnetics [J]. International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, 2001, 15: 231–236.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Michalewicz Z. Genetic algorithms +data structures=evolution programs [M]. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kaelo P, Ali M. Some variants of the controlled random search algorithm for global optimization [J]. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 2006, 130(2): 253–264.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/sea_shadow-ref.htm, 2007.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to De-qing Yang  (杨德庆).

Additional information

Foundation item: the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 10672100)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, Dq., Guo, Fj. Ship appearance optimal design on RCS reduction using response surface method and genetic algorithms. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 13, 336–342 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-008-0336-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-008-0336-9

Key words

CLC number

Navigation