Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Economic viability of mega-size containership in different service networks

  • Published:
Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mega-size containership viability was analyzed by considering different service networks for different ship sizes: hub-and-spoke and multi-port-calling (MPC) networks for mega-size containerships and conventional ships. A model was proposed, which quantifies the economies of scale in operating large containerships and constructs models for ship routing under different service networks. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to test the effect of feeder costs and the results analyzed to determine optimal containership size with respect to different operational scenarios. Throughout model applications for Asia-Europe and Asia-North America trades, the mega-size containership is competitive in all scenarios for Asia-Europe, while it is viable for Asia-North America only when the feeder costs are low.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cullinane K, Khanna M. Economics of scale in large containerships: optimal size and geographical implications [J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2000, 8(3): 181–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Imai A, Nishiimura E, Papadimitriou S, et al. The economic viability of container mega-ships [J]. Transportation Research Part E, 2006, 42(1): 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hsu C I, Hsieh Y P. Routing, ship size, and sailing frequency decision-making for a maritime hub-and-spoke container network [J]. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 2007, 45(7): 899–916.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Gilman S. The size economies and network efficiency of large containerships [J]. International Journal of Maritime Economics, 1999, 1(1): 39–59.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Lim S M. Economics of scale in container shipping [J]. Maritime Policy & Management, 1998, 25(4): 361–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hsieh S H, Chang F R. Applications of the hub-and-spoke network model in routing liner ships [J]. Transportation Planning Journal, 2001, 30(4): 871–890.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bergantino A S, Veenstra A W. Interconnection and co-ordination: an application of network theory to liner shipping [J]. International Journal of Maritime Economics, 2002, 4(3): 231–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Talley W K. Optimal container ship size [J]. Maritime Policy and Management, 1990, 17(3): 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Naval Architecture, Ocean & Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 200240, China

    Fei-er Chen  (陈飞儿) & Ren-yi Zhang  (张仁颐)

Authors
  1. Fei-er Chen  (陈飞儿)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ren-yi Zhang  (张仁颐)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fei-er Chen  (陈飞儿).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, Fe., Zhang, Ry. Economic viability of mega-size containership in different service networks. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci. 13, 221–225 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-008-0221-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-008-0221-6

Key words

CLC number

Search

Navigation