Skip to main content
Log in

Recent advances in solar cells and photo-electrochemical water splitting by scanning electrochemical microscopy

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Optoelectronics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Investigation on the mechanism and kinetics of charge transfer at semiconductor/electrolyte interface is significant for improving the photoelectric conversion efficiency and developing novel and high-efficiency photovoltaic devices. Scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM), as a powerful analytical technique, has a potential advantage of high spatial and temporal resolution. It has been expanded into a broad range of research fields since the first inception of SECM in 1989 by Bard groups, which includes biological, enzymes, corrosion, energy conversion and storage (such as solar cells, hydrogen and battery). Herein, we review the basic principles and the development of SECM, and chiefly introduce the recent advances of SECM investigation in photoelectrochemical (PEC) cells including solar cells and PEC water splitting. These advances include rapid screening of photocatalysts/photoelectrodes, interfacial reaction kinetics and quantitation of reaction intermediates, which is significant for evaluating the performance, choosing catalysts and developing novel composite photoanodes and high efficiency devices. Finally, we briefly describe the development trends of SECM in energy research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holdren J P. Energy and sustainability. Science, 2007, 315(5813): 737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lianos P. Review of recent trends in photoelectrocatalytic conversion of solar energy to electricity and hydrogen. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2017, 210: 235–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li D, Shi J, Li C. Transition-metal-based electrocatalysts as cocatalysts for photoelectrochemical water splitting: a mini review. Small, 2018, 14(23): 1704179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fujishima A, Honda K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature, 1972, 238(5358): 37–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Klotz D, Grave D A, Dotan H, Rothschild A. Empirical analysis of the photoelectrochemical impedance response of hematite photoanodes for water photo-oxidation. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2018, 9(6): 1466–1472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang M, Chen P, Humphry-Baker R, Zakeeruddin S M, Grätzel M. The influence of charge transport and recombination on the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells. ChemPhysChem, 2009, 10(1): 290–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Klotz D, Ellis D S, Dotan H, Rothschild A. Empirical in operando analysis of the charge carrier dynamics in hematite photoanodes by PEIS, IMPS and IMVS. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2016, 18(34): 23438–23457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsyganok A, Klotz D, Malviya K D, Rothschild A, Grave D A. Different roles of Fe1–xNixOOH co-catalyst on hematite (a-Fe2O3) photoanodes with different dopants. ACS Catalysis, 2018, 8(4): 2754–2759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Berera R, van Grondelle R, Kennis J T. Ultrafast transient absorption spectroscopy: principles and application to photosynthetic systems. Photosynthesis Research, 2009, 101(2-3): 105–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pei G X, Wijten J H J, Weckhuysen B M. Probing the dynamics of photogenerated holes in doped hematite photoanodes for solar water splitting using transient absorption spectroscopy. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2018, 20(15): 9806–9811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang M, Alemu G, Shen Y. Scanning probe microscopy investigation of metal oxides nanocrystalline. In: Current Microscopy Contributions to Advances in Science and Technology, Chapter 3, 2012, 1377–1386

    Google Scholar 

  12. Esposito D V, Baxter J B, John J, Lewis N S, Moffat T P, Ogitsu T, O’Neil G D, Pham T A, Talin A A, Velazquez J M, Wood B C. Methods of photoelectrode characterization with high spatial and temporal resolution. Energy & Environmental Science, 2015, 8(10): 2863–2885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cen J, Wu Q, Liu M, Orlov A. Developing new understanding of photoelectrochemical water splitting via in-situ techniques: a review on recent progress. Green Energy & Environment, 2017, 2(2): 100–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Miki T, Yanagi H. Scanning probe microscopic characterization of surface-modified n-TiO2 single-crystal electrodes. Langmuir, 1998, 14(12): 3405–3410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wierzbinski E, Szklarczyk M. Photoelectrochemical and in situ atomic force microscopy studies of films derived from o-methoxyaniline solution on gallium arsenide (100) photoelectrode. Thin Solid Films, 2003, 424(2): 191–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Toma F M, Cooper J K, Kunzelmann V, McDowell M T, Yu J, Larson D M, Borys N J, Abelyan C, Beeman J W, Yu K M, Yang J, Chen L, Shaner M R, Spurgeon J, Houle F A, Persson K A, Sharp I D. Mechanistic insights into chemical and photochemical transformations of bismuth vanadate photoanodes. Nature Communications, 2016, 7: 12012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Economou N J, Mubeen S, Buratto S K, McFarland E W. Investigation of arrays of photosynthetically active heterostructures using conductive probe atomic force microscopy. Nano Letters, 2014, 14(6): 3328–3334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakamura R, Nakato Y. Primary intermediates of oxygen photoevolution reaction on TiO2 (Rutile) particles, revealed by in situ FTIR absorption and photoluminescence measurements. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2004, 126(4): 1290–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zandi O, Hamann T W. Determination of photoelectrochemical water oxidation intermediates on haematite electrode surfaces using operando infrared spectroscopy. Nature Chemistry, 2016, 8(8): 778–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McKelvey K, Nadappuram B P, Actis P, Takahashi Y, Korchev Y E, Matsue T, Robinson C, Unwin P R. Fabrication, characterization, and functionalization of dual carbon electrodes as probes for scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM). Analytical Chemistry, 2013, 85(15): 7519–7526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zampardi G, Klink S, Kuznetsov V, Erichsen T, Maljusch A, La Mantia F, Schuhmann W, Ventosa E. Combined AFM/SECM investigation of the solid electrolyte interphase in Li-ion batteries. Chemelectrochem, 2015, 2(10): 1607–1611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Takahashi Y, Shevchuk A I, Novak P, Murakami Y, Shiku H, Korchev Y E, Matsue T. Simultaneous noncontact topography and electrochemical imaging by SECM/SICM featuring ion current feedback regulation. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2010, 132(29): 10118–10126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Baranski A, Diakowski P. Application of AC impedance techniques to scanning electrochemical microscopy. Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, 2004, 8(10): 683–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mirkin M, Fan F, Bard A. Scanning electrochemical microscopy part 13. Evaluation of the tip shapes of nanometer size microelectrodes. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 1992, 328(1-2): 47–62

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bard A, Fan F, Kwak J, Lev O. Scanning electrochemical microscopy: introduction and principles. Analytical Chemistry, 1989, 61(3): 132–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Engstrom R, Pharr C. Scanning electrochemical microscopy. Analytical Chemistry, 1989, 61(19): 1099A–1104A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Polcari D, Dauphin-Ducharme P, Mauzeroll J. Scanning electrochemical microscopy: a comprehensive review of experimental parameters from 1989 to 2015. Chemical Reviews, 2016, 116(22): 13234–13278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rodriguez-López J, Alpuche-Aviles M A, Bard A J. Selective insulation with poly(tetrafluoroethylene) of substrate electrodes for electrochemical background reduction in scanning electrochemical microscopy. Analytical Chemistry, 2008, 80(5): 1813–1818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rodríguez-López J. Surface interrogation mode of scanning electrochemical microscopy (SI-SECM): an approach to the study of adsorption and (electro)catalysis at electrodes. Electroanalytical Chemistry: A Series of Advances, 2012, 24: 287–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang B, Xu X, Zhang X, Huang D, Li S, Zhang Y, Zhan F, Deng M, He Y, Chen W, Shen Y, Wang M. Investigation of dye regeneration kinetics in sensitized solar cells by scanning electrochemical microscopy. ChemPhysChem, 2014, 15(6): 1182–1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Weng Y, Hsiao K. Composition optimization of ZnO-based photocatalyst arrays by scanning electrochemical microscopy and the characterization of efficient photocatalysts. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(8): 3238–3248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Li F, Ciani I, Bertoncello P, Unwin P R, Zhao J J, Bradbury C R, Fermin D J. Scanning electrochemical microscopy of redoxmediated hydrogen evolution catalyzed by two-dimensional assemblies of palladium nanoparticles. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2008, 112(26): 9686–9694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang B, Yuan H, Zhang X, Huang D, Li S, Wang M, Shen Y. Investigation of regeneration kinetics in quantum-dots-sensitized solar cells with scanning electrochemical microscopy. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2014, 6(23): 20913–20918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Alemu G, Zhang B, Li J, Xu X, Cui J, Shen Y, Wang M. Investigation of dye-regeneration kinetics at dye-sensitized p-type CuCrO2 film/electrolytes interface with scanning electrochemical microscopy. Nano, 2014, 9(5): 1440008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Martin C, Bozic-Weber B, Constable E, Glatzel T, Housecroft C, Wright I. Development of scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM) techniques for the optimization of dye sensitized solar cells. Electrochimica Acta, 2014, 119: 86–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Schmidt I, Plettenberg I, Kimmich D, Ellis H, Witt J, Dosche C, Wittstock G. Spatially resolved analysis of screen printed photoanodes of dye-sensitized solar cells by scanning electrochemical microscopy. Electrochimica Acta, 2016, 222: 735–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shen Y, Träuble M, Wittstock G. Detection of hydrogen peroxide produced during electrochemical oxygen reduction using scanning electrochemical microscopy. Analytical Chemistry, 2008, 80(3): 750–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Li H, Du M, Mleczko M J, Koh A L, Nishi Y, Pop E, Bard A J, Zheng X. Kinetic study of hydrogen evolution reaction over strained MoS2 with sulfur vacancies using scanning electrochemical microscopy. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2016, 138 (15): 5123–5129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jung C, Sánchez-Sánchez CM, Lin C L, Rodríguez-López J, Bard A J. Electrocatalytic activity of Pd-Co bimetallic mixtures for formic acid oxidation studied by scanning electrochemical microscopy. Analytical Chemistry, 2009, 81(16): 7003–7008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sánchez-Sánchez C M, Rodríguez-López J, Bard A J. Scanning electrochemical microscopy. 60. Quantitative calibration of the SECM substrate generation/tip collection mode and its use for the study of the oxygen reduction mechanism. Analytical Chemistry, 2008, 80(9): 3254–3260

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ventosa E, Schuhmann W. Scanning electrochemical microscopy of Li-ion batteries. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2015, 17 (43): 28441–28450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Xu F, Beak B, Jung C. In situ electrochemical studies for Li + ions dissociation from the LiCoO2 electrode by the substrate-generation/tip-collection mode in SECM. Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, 2012, 16(1): 305–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Bülter H, Peters F, Schwenzel J, Wittstock G. Spatiotemporal changes of the solid electrolyte interphase in lithium-ion batteries detected by scanning electrochemical microscopy. Angewandte Chemie, 2014, 53(39): 10531–10535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sumboja A, Tefashe U, Wittstock G, Lee P S. Investigation of charge transfer kinetics of polyaniline supercapacitor electrodes by scanning electrochemical microscopy. Advanced Materials Interfaces, 2015, 2(1): 1400154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang Q, Ye Z, Zhu Z, Liu X, Zhang J, Cao F. Separation and kinetic study of iron corrosion in acidic solution via a modified tip generation/substrate collection mode by SECM. Corrosion Science, 2018, 139: 403–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lee J, Ye H, Pan S, Bard A J. Screening of photocatalysts by scanning electrochemical microscopy. Analytical Chemistry, 2008, 80(19): 7445–7450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sreekanth N, Phani K L. Selective reduction of CO2 to formate through bicarbonate reduction on metal electrodes: new insights gained from SG/TC mode of SECM. Chemical Communications (Cambridge, England), 2014, 50(76): 11143–11146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Rodríguez-López J, Bard A J. Scanning electrochemical microscopy: surface interrogation of adsorbed hydrogen and the open circuit catalytic decomposition of formic acid at platinum. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2010, 132(14): 5121–5129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Fernández J L, White JM, Sun Y, Tang W, Henkelman G, Bard A J. Characterization and theory of electrocatalysts based on scanning electrochemical microscopy screening methods. Langmuir, 2006, 22 (25): 10426–10431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Jantz D, Leonard K. Characterizing electrocatalysts with scanning electrochemical microscopy. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2018, 57(22): 7431–7440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Li Y, Ning X, Ma Q, Qin D, Lu X. Recent advances in electrochemistry by scanning electrochemical microscopy. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2016, 80: 242–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Rincón M E, Trujillo M E, Ávalos J, Casillas N. Photoelectrochemical processes at interfaces of nanostructured TiO2/carbon black composites studied by scanning photoelectrochemical microscopy. Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, 2007, 11(9): 1287–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Bozic B, Figgemeier E. Scanning electrochemical microscopy under illumination: an elegant tool to directly determine the mobility of charge carriers within dye-sensitized nanostructured semiconductors. Chemical Communications (Cambridge, England), 2006, 21 (21): 2268–2270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Tefashe U M, Loewenstein T, Miura H, Schlettwein D, Wittstock G. Scanning electrochemical microscope studies of dye regeneration in indoline (D149)-sensitized ZnO photoelectrochemical cells. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2010, 650(1): 24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Tefashe U M, Rudolph M, Miura H, Schlettwein D, Wittstock G. Photovoltaic characteristics and dye regeneration kinetics in D149-sensitized ZnO with varied dye loading and film thickness. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2012, 14(20): 7533–7542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Tefashe U M, Nonomura K, Vlachopoulos N, Hagfeldt A, Wittstock G. Effect of cationon dye regeneration kinetics of N719-sensitized TiO2 films in acetonitrile-based and ionic-liquid-based electrolytes investigated by scanning electrochemical microscopy. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2012, 116(6): 4316–4323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Shen Y, Nonomura K, Schlettwein D, Zhao C, Wittstock G. Photoelectrochemical kinetics of eosin y-sensitized zinc oxide films investigated by scanning electrochemical microscopy. Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2006, 12(22): 5832–5839

    Google Scholar 

  58. Shen Y, Tefashe U M, Nonomura K, Loewenstein T, Schlettwein D, Wittstock G. Photoelectrochemical kinetics of Eosin Y-sensitized zinc oxide films investigated by scanning electrochemical microscopy under illumination with different LED. Electrochimica Acta, 2009, 55(2): 458–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Xu X, Zhang B, Cui J, Xiong D, Shen Y, Chen W, Sun L, Cheng Y, Wang M. Efficient p-type dye-sensitized solar cells based on disulfide/thiolate electrolytes. Nanoscale, 2013, 5(17): 7963–7969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Kojima A, Teshima K, Shirai Y, Miyasaka T. Organometal halide perovskites as visible-light sensitizers for photovoltaic cells. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2009, 131(17): 6050–6051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Hsu H, Ji L, Du M, Zhao J, Yu E, Bard A. Optimization of PbI2/MAPbI3 perovskite composites by scanning electrochemical microscopy. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2016, 120(35): 19890–19895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Alemu G, Li J, Cui J, Xu X, Zhang B, Cao K, Shen Y, Cheng Y, Wang M. Investigation on regeneration kinetics at perovskite/oxide interface with scanning electrochemical microscopy. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2015, 3(17): 9216–9222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Jang J, Lee J, Ye H, Fan F, Bard A. Rapid screening of effective dopants for Fe2O3 photocatalysts with scanning electrochemical microscopy and investigation of their photoelectrochemical properties. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2009, 113(16): 6719–6724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Currao A. Photoelectrochemical water splitting. Chimia, 2007, 61 (12): 815–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Acar C, Dincer I, Zamfirescu C. A review on selected heterogeneous photocatalysts for hydrogen production. International Journal of Energy Research, 2014, 38(15): 1903–1920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Acar C, Dincer I. A review and evaluation of photoelectrode coating materials and methods for photoelectrochemical hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(19): 7950–7959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Shi Q, Murcia-López S, Tang P, Flox C, Morante J, Bian Z, Wang H, Andreu T. Role of tungsten doping on the surface states in BiVO4 photoanodes for water oxidation: tuning the electron trapping process. ACS Catalysis, 2018, 8(4): 3331–3342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Yang Y, Niu S, Han D, Liu T, Wang G, Li Y. Progress in developing metal oxide nanomaterials for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Advanced Energy Materials, 2017, 7(19): 1700555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Zhang X, Zhang B, Zuo Z, Wang M, Shen Y. N/Si co-doped oriented single crystalline rutile TiO2 nanorods for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2015, 3(18): 10020–10025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Zhang X, Yang H, Zhang B, Shen Y, Wang M. BiOI-TiO2 nanocomposites for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Advanced Materials Interfaces, 2016, 3(1): 1500273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Harrison S, Hayne M. Photoelectrolysis using type-II semiconductor heterojunctions. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1): 11638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Wang H, Zhang L, Chen Z, Hu J, Li S, Wang Z, Liu J, Wang X. Semiconductor heterojunction photocatalysts: design, construction, and photocatalytic performances. Chemical Society Reviews, 2014, 43(15): 5234–5244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Yang J, Wang D, Han H, Li C. Roles of cocatalysts in photocatalysis and photoelectrocatalysis. Accounts of Chemical Research, 2013, 46(8): 1900–1909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Zhang X, Zhang B, Liu S, Kang H, Kong W, Zhang S, Shen Y, Yang B. RGO modified Ni doped FeOOH for enhanced electrochemical and photoelectrochemical water oxidation. Applied Surface Science, 2018, 436: 974–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Zhang X, Zhang B, Luo Y, Lv X, Shen Y. Phosphate modified N/Si co-doped rutile TiO2 nanorods for photoelectrochemical water oxidation. Applied Surface Science, 2017, 391: 288–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Zhang X, Zhang B, Huang D, Yuan H, Wang M, Shen Y. TiO2 nanotubes modified with electrochemically reduced graphene oxide for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Carbon, 2014, 80: 591–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Shi W, Zhang X, Brillet J, Huang D, Li M, Wang M, Shen Y. Significant enhancement of the photoelectrochemical activity of WO3 nanoflakes by carbon quantum dots decoration. Carbon, 2016, 105: 387–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Shi W, Zhang X, Li S, Zhang B, Wang M, Shen Y. Carbon coated Cu2O nanowires for photoelectrochemical water splitting with enhanced activity. Applied Surface Science, 2015, 358: 404–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Zhang X, Zhang B, Cao K, Brillet J, Chen J, Wang M, Shen Y. A perovskite solar cell-TiO2@BiVO4 photoelectrochemical system for direct solar water splitting. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2015, 3(43): 21630–21636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Chen Y S, Manser J S, Kamat P V. All solution-processed lead halide perovskite-BiVO4 tandem assembly for photolytic solar fuels production. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2015, 137 (2): 974–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Brillet J, Yum J, Cornuz M, Hisatomi T, Solarska R, Augustynski J, Grätzel M, Sivula K. Highly efficient water splitting by a dualabsorber tandem cell. Nature Photonics, 2012, 6(12): 824–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Park H, Kweon K, Ye H, Paek E, Hwang G, Bard A. Factors in the metal doping of BiVO4 for improved photoelectrocatalytic activity as studied by scanning electrochemical microscopy and firstprinciples density-functional calculation. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2011, 115(36): 17870–17879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Leonard K, Nam K, Lee H, Kang S, Park H, Bard A. ZnWO4/WO3 composite for improving photoelectrochemical water oxidation. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2013, 117(31): 15901–15910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Ye H, Park H, Bard A. Screening of electrocatalysts for photoelectrochemical water oxidation on W-doped BiVO4 photocatalysts by scanning electrochemic al microscopy. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2011, 115(25): 12464–12470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Ye H, Lee J, Jang J, Bard A. Rapid screening of BiVO4-based photocatalysts by scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM) and studies of their photoelectrochemical properties. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2010, 114(31): 13322–13328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Lu X, Hu Y, He H. Electron transfer kinetics at interfaces using secm (scanning electrochemical microscopy). In: Sur U K, ed. Recent Trend in Electrochemical Science and Technology. Rijeka: In Tech, 2012, 127–156

    Google Scholar 

  87. Ahn H S, Bard A J. Surface interrogation scanning electrochemical microscopy of Ni1–xFexOOH (0<x<0.27) oxygen evolving catalyst: kinetics of the “fast” iron sites. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2016, 138(1): 313–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Zhang B, Zhang X, Xiao X, Shen Y. Photoelectrochemical water splitting system–a study of interfacial charge transfer with scanning electrochemical microscopy. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016, 8(3): 1606–1614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Rastgar S, Wittstock G. Characterization of photoactivity of nanostructured BiVO4 at polarized liquid-liquid interfaces by scanning electrochemical microscopy. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2017, 121(46): 25941–25948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Ahn H S, Bard A J. Surface interrogation of CoPi water oxidation catalyst by scanning electrochemical microscopy. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2015, 137(2): 612–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Zigah D, Rodríguez-López J, Bard A J. Quantification of photoelectrogenerated hydroxyl radical on TiO2 by surface interrogation scanning electrochemical microscopy. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2012, 14(37): 12764–12772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Park H, Leonard K, Bard A. Surface interrogation scanning electrochemical microscopy (SI-SECM) of photoelectrochemistry at a W/Mo-BiVO4 semiconductor electrode: quantification of hydroxyl radicals during water oxidation. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2013, 117(23): 12093–12102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Cho S, Park H, Lee H, Nam K, Bard A. Metal doping of BiVO4 by composite electrodeposition with improved photoelectrochemical water oxidation. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2013, 117(44): 23048–23056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Krumov M R, Simpson B H, Counihan M J, Rodríguez-López J. In situ quantification of surface intermediates and correlation to discharge products on hematite photoanodes using a combined scanning electrochemical microscopy approach. Analytical Chemistry, 2018, 90(5): 3050–3057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Kim J Y, Ahn H S, Bard A J. Surface interrogation scanning electrochemical microscopy for a photoelectrochemical reaction: water oxidation on a hematite surface. Analytical Chemistry, 2018, 90(5): 3045–3049

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51602120), Natural Science Foundation of Education Department of Henan Province (No. 17A430023), and the opening project of Henan Provincial Key Laboratory of Nanocomposites and Applications (No. hkd20170106).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaofan Zhang.

Additional information

Xiaofan Zhang received her Ph.D. degree in Photoelectric Information Engineering from Huazhong University of Science and Technology in 2015. She joined Henan Provincial Key Laboratory of Nanocomposite and Applications and Institute of Nanostructured Functional Materials at Huanghe Science and Technology College in 2015. Now she is a lecturer, working in School of Environment and Civil Engineering of Dongguan University of Technology from 2018. Her research interests are related to energy conversion, and focus on solar water splitting, dynamics investigation of photoelectrochemical interfacial reaction and electrocatalysis.

Man Liu received her M.Sc degree from the College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering at Zhengzhou University in 2013. Currently, she works on Henan Provincial Key Laboratory of Nano-composite and Applications of Huanghe Science and Technology College. Her research interests mainly focus on analysis of materials by means of NMR spectrometer, mass spectrograph, X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy(SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM).

Weiqian Kong obtained her M.Sc degree from Institute of Functional Nano & Soft Materials (FUNSOM) in Soochow University in 2015. Then she works as a teaching assistant until now in Henan Provincial Key Laboratory of Nanocomposite and Applications, Institute of Nanostructured Functional Materials of Huanghe Science and Technology College. Her research interests focus on carbon nanomaterials and their applications in detection and catalysis, photoelectrochemical water splitting, energy and environmental applications.

Hongbo Fan received his B.Sc. degree from Henan Normal University in 1983, his M.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees from Huazhong University of Science and Technology in 1996 and 2003, respectively. He worked as a postdoctoral research fellow at South China University of Technology from 2003 to 2005. Prof. Fan joined Dongguan University of Technology in 2005. Currently, he is the dean of School of Environment and Civil Engineering and the director of Dongguan Clean Production Technology Center. His research interests are related to energy storage materials, intelligence materials, as well as energy efficiency and environmental protection, and so on.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Liu, M., Kong, W. et al. Recent advances in solar cells and photo-electrochemical water splitting by scanning electrochemical microscopy. Front. Optoelectron. 11, 333–347 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12200-018-0852-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12200-018-0852-7

Keywords

Navigation