Frontiers of Optoelectronics

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 80–88 | Cite as

Reducing the negative effects of flywheel disturbance on space camera image quality using the vibration isolation method

  • Changcheng Deng
  • Deqiang Mu
  • Junli Guo
  • Peng Xie
Research Article


Although the performance of space cameras has largely improved, the micro vibration from flywheel disturbances still significantly affects the image quality of these cameras. This study adopted a passive isolation method to reduce the negative effect of flywheel disturbance on image quality. A metal-rubber shock absorber was designed and installed in a real satellite. A finite element model of an entire satellite was constructed, and a transient analysis was conducted afterward. The change in the modulate transfer function was detected using ray tracing and optical transfer function formulas. Experiments based on real products were performed to validate the influence of the metal-rubber shock absorber. The experimental results confirmed the simulation results by showing that the negative effects of flywheel disturbance on the image quality of space cameras can be diminished significantly using the vibration isolation method.


micro vibration modulate transfer function vibration isolation flywheel disturbance 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The author thanks the Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences for their assistance in the experiment. This work was supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) (No. 2012AA121502).


  1. 1.
    Pang S, Yang L, Qu G. New development of micro-vibration integrated modeling and assessment technology for high performance spacecraft. Structure & Environment Engineering, 2007, 34(6): 1–9Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhong W C. Spacecraft obit and attitude parameters impact analysis for optical imaging. Dissertation for the Master Degree. Haerbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2009Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee D O, Yoon J S, Han J H. Development of integrated simulation tool for jitter analysis. International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 2012, 13(1): 64–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Masterson R A, Miller D W, Grogan R L. Development and validation of reaction wheel disturbance models:empirical model. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2002, 249(3): 575–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Han X. Satellite jitter analysis based on unbalance of flywheel. Aerospace Shanghai, 2012, 29(6): 42–45Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang B, Wang X, Hu Y. Integrated analysis on effect of microvibration on high resolution space camera imaging. Spacecraft Recovery & Remote Sensing, 2012, 33(2): 60–66Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang H, Wang W, Wang X, Zou G, Li G, Fan X. Space camera image degradation induced by satellite micro-vibration. Acta Photoning Sinica, 2013, 42(10): 1212–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stewart D. A platform with six degree of freedom. Proceedings- Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 1965, 180(1): 371–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Klenke S, Baca T. Structural dynamics test simulation and optimization for aerospace components. Expert Systems with Applications, 1996, 11(4): 82–89Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rudoler S, Hadar O, Fisher M, Kopeika N S. Image resolution limits resulting from mechanical vibration. Optics and Precision Engineering, 1991, 30(5): 577–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fu M, Liu Y, Cui M, Cao M. Metal-rubber vibration absorber for aerocraft. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2013, 21(5): 1174–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang J. Evaluation and optimization on dynamic imaging quality of an optical remote sensor. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Changchun: Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, 2000Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang Y. Imaging MTF of space camera under vibration and simulation. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2011, 19(9): 2146–2153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schowengerdt R A, Basedow RW, Colwell J E. Measurement of the HYDICE system MTF from flight imagery. SPIE Proceedings, 1996, 2821: 127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Léger D, Duffaut J, Robinet F. MTF measurement using spotlight. IEEE Proceedings of IGARRS, 1994, 4: 2010–2012Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu C, Jing X, Daley S, Li F. Recent advances in micro-vibration isolation. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2015, 56–57: 55–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Changcheng Deng
    • 1
    • 2
  • Deqiang Mu
    • 3
  • Junli Guo
    • 1
  • Peng Xie
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and PhysicsChinese Academy of SciencesChangchunChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Changchun University of TechnologyChangchunChina

Personalised recommendations