The distinctive characteristics of the hourly distribution of live births on specific days in Japan

Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine volume 21, pages501–522(2016)Cite this article

Abstract

Objectives

Anomalous variations in live births on February 29/March 1, April 1/April 2 and the days before the New Year holidays/New Year holidays have been reported in Japan. The distribution of live births was investigated on those days and whether or not such dates were selected due to obstetric intervention is discussed.

Methods

Using a method similar to the \(\overline{\text{X}}\)–R control chart, anomalous variations in the hourly number of live births were detected. The number of unusual births was estimated.

Results

The number of live births at 13:00–16:59 hours was significantly higher from December 24 to 28 and significantly lower from December 29–January 3, February 29, and April 1, especially on weekdays. In hospitals, the increases from 9:00–12:59 and 13:00–16:59 hours from December 24 to 27 were approximately 10 and 25 %, respectively, of the expected births for those times in the mid-1980s; thereafter, the rates were 30 and 35 %. After 2000, the child births at 13:00–16:59 hours on February 29 and April 1 decreased by approximately 35 % in hospitals and clinics. The numbers of live births at 0:00–0:59 hours were significantly higher on March 1 and April 2 until 2001.

Conclusion

Anomalous variations at 0:00–0:59 hours may be associated with fictitious reporting on birth certificates. Anomalous variations from 13:00 to 16:59 hours on weekdays suggest that many individuals may avoid obstetric intervention on February 29 and April 1 and that the number of higher-risk deliveries may significantly increase in the daytime on the days before the New Year holidays due to obstetric intervention for institutional reasons.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. 1.

    Takahashi M, Nishina M, Ohta A. The effect of determining birthdays by social factors such as maternal preference on the distribution in the number of daily live births. Jpn J Public Health. 2014;61:16–29 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Imamura O, Sawaki K. Effect of the month of birth on the mental and physical characteristics of children. Bull Sch Phys Educ Tokai Univ. 1989;19:73–9 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lo JC. Patients’ attitudes vs. physicians’ determination: implications for cesarean sections. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:91–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Levy BR, Chung PH, Slade MD. Influence of Valentine’s Day and Halloween on birth timing. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73:1246–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lei H, Wen SW, Walker M. Determinants of caesarean delivery among women hospitalized for childbirth in a remote population in China. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003;25:937–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gülmezoglu AM, et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007–08. Lancet. 2010;375:490–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Statistics and information department, minister’s secretariat, ministry of health and welfare. A Special Article Regarding the Decrease in the Number of Live Births in 1966. [Showa 41 nen no shussei-genshou nitsuite.] In: Vital Statistics of Japan 1966 volume 1. Tokyo, Japan: Health and Welfare Statistics Association. 1969;1:68–9 (in Japanese).

  8. 8.

    Statistics and information department, minister’s secretariat, ministry of health, labour and welfare. Table 29–30 and Table 46–47. In: Static/Dynamic Survey of Medical Institutions and Hospital Report, 2011. Section 2. Tokyo, Japan: Health, Labour and Welfare Statistics Association. 2013; 266–9 & 274–7.

  9. 9.

    JSOG and JAOG. “CQ412: How Should Labor be Induced?”: In: JSOG and JAOG, ed. Guidelines for Obstetrical Practice in Japan, 2014 Edition. Tokyo, Japan: Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology; 2014.

  10. 10.

    Caughey AB, Stotland NE, Washington AE, Escobar GJ. Maternal and obstetric complications of pregnancy are associated with increasing gestational age at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:155.e1-6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Caughey AB, Sundaram V, Kaimal AJ, Gienger A, Cheng YW, McDonald KM, et al. Systematic review: elective induction of labor versus expectant management of pregnancy. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):252–63 (W53-63).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Okada M, Ogino H, Koge A, Ohashi S, Fujinaka Y, Iwamura M, et al. Mode of delivery, gestational age and clinical courses for Transient Tachypnea of the newborn in term infants. J Jpn Soc Perin Neon Med. 2009;45:1317–21.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Fukushima M, Maeda S, Shiba T, Yoshimura S, Miki N, Yamanaka C, et al. Investigation of risk factors of transient tachypnea of the newborn in our hospital and trial for early diagnosis. Tenri Found Tenri Inst Med Res. 2014;17:67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Statistics and information department, minister’s secretariat, ministry of health, labour and welfare. In: Vital Statistics of Japan (non-published table), 1981–2013. Tokyo, Japan: Minister’s Secretariat, Health, Labour and Welfare Statistics and Information Department. 1981–2013. (in Japanese).

  15. 15.

    Matsuda S, Kahyo H. Analysis of the geographical differences in the seasonality of birth in Japan. Jpn. J. Biometeor. 1993;30:60–75 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Nonaka K, Desjardins B, Légaré J, Charbonneau H, Miura T. Effects of maternal birth season on birth seasonality in the Canadian population during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Hum Biol. 1990;62:701–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    NIST/SEMATECH. 6. Process or product monitoring and control. In: e-Handbook of statistical methods, http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/. Aceessed 1 Aug 2016.

  18. 18.

    Tango T. Clinical Laboratory. In: Miyahara H, Tango T, ed. A handbook of medical statistics, Tokyo, Japan: Asakura Shoten. 1997;514–41 (in Japanese).

  19. 19.

    Shin S. Changes in obstetric management—changes in deliveries. Perinat Med. 2000;30:1612–6 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Shin S. The changes in the percentage of cesarean sections & the changes in acceptability. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;3:269–74 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ando K. Analysis of births by day of the week and time of induced labor. [Bunben-jikoku, youbi oyobi yuuhatsu-bunben no toukeigakuteki-kentou.]. Perinat Med. 1995;25:1557–62 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Trends in live births by day of the week and time of live birth and place of delivery. In: Live Births: Specified Report of Vital Statistics in FY 2010. Tokyo, Japan: Health, Labour and Welfare Statistics Association, 2011; pp. 272–83.

  23. 23.

    Morita N, Matsushima N, Ogata N, Saeki K, Ishibashi M, Komukai H, et al. Nationwide description of live Japanese births by day of the week, hour, and location. J Epidemiol. 2002;12:330–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Matsushima N, Morita N, Ogata N, Saeki K, Matsuda R, Kurumatani N. Live birth distribution by time and place from 1981 to 1998 in Japan. Jpn J Hyg. 2003;57:674–81 (in Japanese).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Statistics and information department, minister’s secretariat, ministry of health, labour and welfare. Table 22. Trends in live births per day by day of the week and time of live birth and place of delivery, 1975 and 2009. In: Live births (specified report of vital statistics in FY 2010). Tokyo, Japan: Health and Welfare Statistics Association 2011; pp. 278–83.

  26. 26.

    Mathews TJ, Curtin S. When are babies born: morning, noon, or night? Birth Certificate Data for 2013. NCHS Data Brief. 2015;200:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kikuchi Medical Association. Examination hours during Bon. http://www.kikuchi-med.or.jp/news/thumbnails/563-1.pdf. 1 Aug 2016.

  28. 28.

    Nagaoka Medical Association. Nagaoka festival/examination hours during Bon. http://www.nagaoka-med.or.jp. 1 Aug 2016.

  29. 29.

    Noshiro Yamamoto medical association. Medical facility Schedules during Bon. http://www.nyma2.jp/H24obon.pdf. 1 Aug 2016.

  30. 30.

    Chofu Medical Association. Inquiry of Medical Facility Summer Holidays. www. Chofu-med.or.jp. 1 Aug 2016.

  31. 31.

    Ambulance service planning office, fire and disaster management agency. Feature article: an outline of the partial revision of the fire service law. [Shoubouhou no ichibu wo kaiseisuru houritsu no gaiyou.]. Shobo-no-ugoki. 2009;458:4–7 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. II. Manual on completion of a birth certificate, and a fetal death certificate. In: Manual on completion of a death certificate, a birth certificate, and a fetal death certificate. Tokyo, Japan: Health, Labour and Welfare Statistics Association; 1995. pp. 49–53 (in Japanese).

  33. 33.

    Ministry of health, labour and welfare. In: Static/dynamic survey of medical institutions and hospital report. Tokyo, Japan: Health, labour and welfare statistics association, 1984–2014.

  34. 34.

    Tsumura N, Tsumura N, Sagawa T. The significance of induced labor in our department. [Touka niokeru bunben-yuhatsu no igi ni tsuite.]. Chitose City Hosp J. 2009;5(1):1–3 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Shimizu Y. The frequency of use of labor-inducing drugs and the duration of labor by fiscal year. [Nendobetsu jintsu-sokushin-zai shiyou-hindo to bunben-shoyou-jikan.]. Adv Obstet Gynecol. 1999;51:239–41 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kiuchi A, Tetsuka S, Matsumoto I, et al. A survey on the safety of medical care in regard to deliveries at clinics with hospital beds (second report): are childbirths managed through artificial manipulation in Japan? [Yushou-shinryosho niokeru bunben no iryou-anzen nikansuru chousa (Dai 2 hou). Nihon no osan ha jiniteki na sousa niyotte kanri sareteirunoka?]. Tochigi Matern Health. 2010;36:11–2 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Watanabe H, Shimada M. A study on the ideal method of carrying out deliveries from the perspective of users. In: [Riyousha no tachiba kara mite nozomashii shussan no arikata ni kansuru kenkyu.] Health Science Research (Child and Family Research Project) Report FY 1999 2000; 3/6: pp. 357–411 (in Japanese).

  38. 38.

    Kano N, Shimada C, Komatsu M, et al. Experiencing Childbirth in Ibaraki prefecture: conditions and Women’s satisfaction. ASVPI. 2004;9:1–10 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Ohama E. The rate of induction of labor among the pregnant women, Yokohama. Yokohama Med Bull. 1997;48:259–65 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Saitama Medical University, 38 Morohongo Moroyama-machi, Iruma-gun, Saitama, 350-0495, Japan

    Mihoko Takahashi

Authors
  1. Mihoko Takahashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mihoko Takahashi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest in association with the present study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takahashi, M. The distinctive characteristics of the hourly distribution of live births on specific days in Japan. Environ Health Prev Med 21, 501–522 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12199-016-0560-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Hourly live births
  • Obstetric intervention
  • Birth certificate
  • Excess birth numbers
  • Descriptive epidemiology