Medical effects of internal contamination with actinides: further controversy on depleted uranium and radioactive warfare
- 311 Downloads
The Nuclear Age began in 1945 with testing in New Mexico, USA, and the subsequent bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Regardless of attempts to limit the development of nuclear weapons, the current world arsenal has reached the staggering dimensions and presents a significant concern for the biosphere and mankind. In an explosion of a nuclear weapon, over 400 radioactive isotopes are released into the biosphere, 40 of which pose potential dangers including iodine, cesium, alkaline earths, and actinides. The immediate health effects of nuclear explosions include thermal, mechanical, and acute radiation syndrome. Long-term effects include radioactive fallout, internal contamination, and long-term genotoxicity. The current controversial concern over depleted uranium’s somatic and genetic toxicity is still a subject of worldwide sustained research. The host of data generated in the past decades has demonstrated conflicting findings, with the most recent evidence showing that its genotoxicity is greater than previously considered. Of particular concern are the osteotropic properties of uranium isotopes due to their final retention in the crystals of exchangeable and nonexchangeable bone as well as their proximity to pluripotent stem cells. Depleted uranium remains an unresolved issue in both warfare and the search for alternative energy sources.
KeywordsRadioactive warfare Depleted uranium Organotropic radioisotopes Nuclear proliferation Internal contamination with radionuclides
The author declares that there are no financial or any other conflicts of interest.
- 1.Walker G. The first atomic test. Trinity Atomic Web Site. 2005. http://www.abomb1.org/trinity/trinity1.html. Accessed 21 Mar 2015.
- 2.Malam J. The bombing of Hiroshima: August 6, 1945. Minnesota: Smart Apple Media; 2003.Google Scholar
- 3.McNamara R, Blight J. Wilson’s ghost: reducing the risk of conflict, killing and catastrophe in the 21st century. NY: PublicAffairs; 2003.Google Scholar
- 4.Kimball D, Davenport K. Nuclear weapons: who has what at a glance: Arms Control Association, Federation of American Scientists, International Panel on Fissile Materials, U.S. Department of Defense, and U.S. Department of State. Updated 2015. http://www.armscontrol.org. Accessed 15 Mar 2015.
- 5.Durakovic A. Internal contamination with medically significant radionuclides. In: Conklin J, Walker R, editors. Military radiobiology. Orlando: Academic Press, Inc; 1987.Google Scholar
- 6.Vaughan J, Bleaney B, Taylor DM. Distribution, excretion, and effects of plutonium as a bone seeker. In: Hodge HC, Stannard JN, Hursh JB, editors. Handbook of experimental pharmacology—uranium, plutonium, transplutonic elements. Berlin and NY: Springer-Verlag; 1973.Google Scholar
- 7.EPA. Radiation protection. Plutonium. Updated 14 Dec 2014. http://www.epa.gov/radiation/radionuclides/plutonium.html#affecthealth. Accessed 13 Mar 2015.
- 10.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Emergency preparedness and response: acute radiation syndrome. http://emergency.cdc.gov/radiation/ars.asp. Accessed 23 Mar 2015.
- 12.Bowers G. The combined injury syndrome. In: Conklin, J, Walker R, editors. Military radiobiology. Orlando: Academic Press, Inc; 1987.Google Scholar
- 17.Radiation Emergency Medical management. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Updated 21 Nov 2014. http://www.remm.nlm.gov/rdd.htm. Accessed 2 Mar 2015.
- 19.Winter M. Uranium: isotope data. WebElements Ltd, UK. Published 1993. Updated 2015. http://www.webelements.com/uranium/isotopes.html. Accessed 13 Mar 2015.
- 20.Morgan Minutes. Published by Busby C on Nov 2014. https://www.scribd.com/doc/245265707/Minutes-of-Meeting-Held-at-AERE-Harwell-9th-July-1953. Accessed 20 Mar 2015.
- 21.Guirguis L, Faraq N, Salim A. Accurate fast method with high chemical yield for determination of uranium isotopes (234U, 235U, 238U) in granitic samples using alpha spectroscopy. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A. 2014;777(21):211–7.Google Scholar
- 23.Zimmerman P. A primer in the art of deception. The cult of the nuclearists, uranium weapons and fraudulent science. New York: Zimmerman; 2009.Google Scholar
- 25.Sarap NB, Jankovic MM, Todorovic DJ, Nikolic JD, Kovacevic MS. Environmental radioactivity in southern Serbia at locations where depleted uranium was used. Arch Ind Hyg Toxicol. 2014;65(2):189.Google Scholar
- 26.Busby C. The health effects of exposure to uranium and uranium weapons fallout. Documents of the ECRR 2010, No 2. http://earthlife.org.za/www/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/ECRR-Uranium-and-Health-2010.pdf. Accessed 18 Mar 2016.
- 39.Al-Hashimi MM, Wang X. Comparing the cancer in Ninawa during three periods (1980–1990, 1991–2000. 2001–2010) using Poisson regression. J Res Med Sci. 2013;18(12):1026–39.Google Scholar
- 41.Shelleh HH. Depleted uranium. Is it potentially involved in the recent upsurge of malignancies in populations exposed to war dust? Saudi Med. 2012;33(5):483–8.Google Scholar
- 54.Monleau M, Bussy C, Lestaevel P, Houpert P, Paquet F, Chazel V. Bioaccumulation and behavioral effects of depleted uranium in rates exposed to repeated inhalations. Neurosci Lett. 2005;390(1):31–6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Bioaccumulation+and+behavioral+effects+of+depleted+uranium+in+rates+exposed+to+repeated. Accessed 17 Mar 2016.
- 58.Al-Hadithi T, Al-Diwan JK, Saleh AM, Shabiba NP. Birth defects in Iraq and the plausibility of environmental exposure: a review. Confl Health. 2012;6. doi: 10.1186/1752-1505-6-3.
- 63.Schopenhauer A. Aphorismen. Booklassic. 2015:59 (As translated by author).Google Scholar