Advertisement

Journal of Transportation Security

, Volume 10, Issue 1–2, pp 31–43 | Cite as

The “car-bomb” as a terrorist tool at metro stations, railway terminals and airports

  • Alex Shvetsov
  • Svetlana Shvetsova
  • Valentin Aleksandrovich Kozyrev
  • Victor Aleksandrovich Spharov
  • Nikolay Mikhaylovich Sheremet
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this research is the protection of transport facilities, such as metro stations, railway terminals and airports, against terrorist acts. The research includes statistics on terror acts committed in the metros of the world. The author has formulated a definition of transport security. Statistic analysis revealed a major potential terrorist threat for transport facilities. The author has also classified and ranked possible methods of delivering explosive devices to transport facilities according to the threat level. The author has ascertained the method of delivering explosive devices of the highest threat level and has studied deterrents deployed for the protection of transport facilities against “car-bomb” terrorist acts. Comparative analysis and natural experiment showed that deployed fenders do not completely secure against all types of motor vehicles. The author has developed a new protection facility capable of 100% counter-terrorist protection of transport facilities against “car-bomb” terror attacks.

Keywords

Transport security Explosive device “car-bomb” Terrorist attack 

References

  1. DePalma RG, Burris D, Champion HR, Hodgson M (2005) Blast injuries. N Engl J Med 352:335–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dikanova ТА (2010) K voprosu o preduprezhdenii terrorizma na transporte [to the issue of preventing terrorism on transport]. BULLETIN of the Academy of the RF Prosecutor General’s Office 3(17):49–56Google Scholar
  3. Global Terrorism Database (2016) National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism. Retrieved from: http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd
  4. Golub PV (2007) Ispanii osuzhdeny terroristy, povinnye v gibeli 192 chelovek [In Spain terrorists accused of killing 192 people are found guilty and sentenced] [“Rossiiskaya Gazeta” web-site]. Retrieved from https://rg.ru/2007/10/31/ispania-anons.html
  5. Istoriya terrora na kolesah [History of terror on wheels] Internet source С-Kholod&Kholod. Retrieved from http://www.s-kholod.ru/ip_invention_001/incidents_of_ram_attack.html
  6. Jenkins B (2001) Protecting public surface transportation against t…m and serious crime: an executive overview. Mineta Transportation Institute, San JoseGoogle Scholar
  7. Jenkins B (2004) Terrorism and the security of public surface transportation. RAND Corporation, Santa MonicaGoogle Scholar
  8. Krupnye terroristicheskie akty v mire v 2000-2003 gg (2013) [Major terrorist acts in the world in 2000–2013] [RIA “Novosti” web-site]. Retrieved from https://ria.ru/spravka/20110819/420149164.html
  9. Larcher M, Forsberg R, Björnstig U, Holgersson A, Solomos G (2015) Effectiveness of finite-element modelling of damage and injuries for explosions inside trains. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security 8(1):83–100Google Scholar
  10. Loukaitou-Sideris A, Taylor BD, Fink CNY (2006) Rail transit security in an international context: lessons from four cities. Urban Aff Rev 41(6):727–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Muratov VP (2015) Novyy uroven bezopasnosti sozdadut v moskovskom metro k 2020 g. [New security level will be formed in the Moscow subway by 2020]. Regional news agency of the Moscow region. Retrieved from http://riamo.ru/government_interview/20150211/608705532.html
  12. O’Neill C, Robinson A, Ingleton S (2012) Mitigating the effects of fireb..Bs and blast attacks on metro systems. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 48:3518–3517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shvetsov AV (2015a) Transportnaya bezopasnost’ metropolitena [underground railway transport safety]. Izvestiya PGUPS (Emperor Alexander I St Petersburg State Transport University) 45(4):72–77Google Scholar
  14. Shvetsov AV (2015b) Aspekty transportnoi bezopasnosti na Moskovskom metropolitene [aspects of transport security of the Moscow metro]. Transport business in Russia 119(9):147–149Google Scholar
  15. Shvetsov AV (2015c) Tehnologicheskie resheniya obespecheniya transportnoi bezopasnosti Moskovskogo metropolitena [technological solutions transport security of the Moscow metro]. Transport business in Russia 120(5):174–176Google Scholar
  16. Shvetsov AV (2015d) Problemy i resheniya v obespechenii transportnoi bezopasnosti na metropolitene [problems and decisions in ensuring transport safety on the subway]. Transport business in Russia 121(6):258–260Google Scholar
  17. Shvetsov AV (2016a) Metod zashchity metropolitena ot aktov nezakonnogo vmeshatel’stva s ispol’zovatiem transportnyh sredstv [method of protection of the subway against acts of illegal intervention with use of vehicles]. Transport business in Russia 122(1):136–139Google Scholar
  18. Shvetsov AV (2016b) Protivotarannoe zagraditel’noe ustroistvo [Anti-collision protecting device]. Transport of the Russian Federation (Emperor Alexander I St Petersburg State Transport University) 63-64(2–3):58–60Google Scholar
  19. Shvetsov AV (2016c) Aspekyu transportnoi bezopasnosti metropolitena [Subway transport safety aspects]. Transport of the Urals (Ural State University of Railway Transport (USURT)) 49(2):124–128Google Scholar
  20. Shvetsov AV (2016d) Aspekty obespecheniya transportnoi bezopasnosti metropolitena [aspects of ensuring transport safety of the subway]. World of transport (Emperor Nicholas II Moscow State University of Railway Engineering (MIIT)) 2:174–176Google Scholar
  21. ShvetsovAV (2016e) Problemy i resheniya v obespechenii zashchity stantsiy metropolitena ot terroristicheskih aktov [Problems and decisions in ensuring protection of stations of the subway against acts of terrorism]. In Proceedings of the International scientific and practical conference: Technical science - from the theory to practice 51(3), pp 110–122, Novosibirsk. RussiaGoogle Scholar
  22. Shvetsov AV (2016f) Antiterroristicheskaya zashchita metropolitena [Anti-terrorist protection of the subway]. In Proceedings of the International scientific and practical conference: Transport-2016 51(3), pp. 110–122, Rostov-on-Don. RussiaGoogle Scholar
  23. Shvetsov AV (2016g) Protivotarannoe zagraditel’noe ustroistvo [Anti-ram protective device]. Patent № RU 162412. Официальный сайт Федерального агентства по интеллектуальной собственности Российской Федерации. Retrieved from http://www1.fips.ru/fips_servl/fips_servlet
  24. Standberg V (2013) Rail bound traffic - a prime target for contemporary terrorist attacks. J Transp Secur 6(3):271–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Weimann G (2004) www.terror.net: How modern t…m uses the Internet. (Special Report 116). United States Institute of Peace. Retrieved from http://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/sr116.pdf
  26. Wilson J, Jackson B, Eisman M, Steinberg P, Riley J (2007) Securing America’s passenger-rail systems. RAND Corporation, Santa MonicaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Far East State Transport UniversityKhabarovskRussian Federation
  2. 2.Moscow State University of Railway EngineeringMoscowRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations