Advertisement

Journal of Transportation Security

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 271–286 | Cite as

Rail bound traffic—a prime target for contemporary terrorist attacks?

Article

Abstract

The threat of terrorism is a worldwide concern, often discussed in the context of our constantly changing world with new complex threats, risks and crises. This article focuses on terrorist attacks targeting rail bound traffic because of its extreme vulnerability for terrorist attacks. The article provides an empirical overview of the frequency and characteristics of attacks on rail bound traffic. At least in recent years, attacks have been a growing phenomenon. The results are interpreted through the lens of a contemporary terrorism paradigm which revolves around in which way which terrorist organizations organize their activity and if there is an increased religiously motivated terrorism and a presumed shift towards more indiscriminate killing through the use of new tactics and weapons. This article identifies the 20 biggest large-scale attacks on rail bound traffic, and they do resemble contemporary terrorism.

Keywords

Rail bound traffic Terrorism Mass-casualty attacks Security 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Financial support for this work was received from the Section of Disaster Medicine, The National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm and the Department of Political Science, Umeå University, Umeå.

References

  1. Banks W (2009) Smart counterterrorism. Criminol Pub Pol 8(3):593–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ceballos JPG et al (2005) Casualties treated at the closest hospital in the Madrid, March 11, terrorist bombings. Crit Care Med 33(1):107–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chalk P (2005) Trends in terrorism—threats to the united states and the future of the terrorism risk insurance Act. RAND Cooperation, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  4. Crenshaw M (1987) Theories of terrorism: Instrumental and organizational approaches. J Strateg Stud 10(4):13–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cronin AK (2002/2003) Behind the curve globalization and international terrorism. Int Secur 27(3):30–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Duyvesteyn I (2004) How new is the New terrorism. Stud Confl Terror 27(5):439–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Enders W, Sandler T (2000) Is transnational terrorism becoming more threatening? A time-series investigation. J Confl Resolut 44(3):307–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Enders W, Sandler T (2002) Patterns of transnational terrorism, 1970–1999: Alternative time-series estimates. Int Stud Q 46(2):145–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Enders W, Sandler T (2005) After 9/11: Is it all different now? J Confl Resolut 49(2):259–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frykberg E (2002) Medical management of disasters and mass casualties from terrorist bombings: How can we cope? J Traum 53(2):201–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoffman B, McCormick G (2004) Terrorism, signaling, and suicide attack. Stud Confl Terror 27(4):243–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoffman B (2006) Inside terrorism. St. Andrew’s University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. International Union of Railways (2011), UIC world rail statistics Press Release No 18/2011.Google Scholar
  14. Jenkins BM (1977) The potential for nuclear terrorism. RAND Cooperation, St MonicaGoogle Scholar
  15. Jenkins BM (2001) Protecting public surface transportation against terrorism and serious crime: An executive overview. the Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose, MTI Report 01–14Google Scholar
  16. Koblentz G (2011) Predicting peril or the peril of prediction? Assessing the risk of CBRN terrorism. Terror Pol Viol 23(4):501–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kurtulus E (2011) The new terrorism and its critics. Stud Conf Terror 34(6):476–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. LaFree G, Dugan L (2007) Introducing the global terrorism database. Terror Pol Viol 19(2):181–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. LaFree G et al. (2010) Trends in global terrorism. In: Wilkenfeld, Huth, Hewitt (eds) Peace and Conflict Report 2010, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  20. Laqueur W (2003) No end to war—terrorism in twenty—first century. Continuum, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Lockey DJ et al (2005) London bombings July 2005: The immediate pre—hospital medical response. Resuscitation 66(2):ix–xiiCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. National Counterterrorism Center (2010) 2009 Report on terrorism. Office of the Director of National Intelligence, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  23. Okumura T (1998) The Tokyo subway Sarin attack disaster: management, Part 1: Community emergency response. Acad Emerg Med 5(6):613–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pape R (2003) The strategic logic of suicide terrorism. Amer Pol Sci Rev 97(3):343–361Google Scholar
  25. Plant J (2004) Terrorism and the railroads: Redefining security in the wake of 9/11. Rev Pol Res 21(3):293–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rapoport D (2004) The four waves of modern terrorism. In: Cronin &Ludes (eds) Attacking Terrorism—Elements of a Grand Strategy, Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Spencer A (2006) Questioning the concept of new terrorism, peace conflict & development, Issue 8Google Scholar
  28. START Background Report: 9/11, Ten Years Later (2011), National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism.Google Scholar
  29. Taleb NN (2007) The black swan. The impact of the highly improbable. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Tucker D (2001) What’s new about the new terrorism and how dangerous is it. Terror Pol Viol 13:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Weiman G (2004) How modern terrorism uses the internet. Spec Rep Unit Stat Inst Peace 31(116):1–12Google Scholar
  32. Wilson J (2007) Securing america’s passenger-rail systems. RAND Cooperation, PittsburghGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science and Centre for Research and Development in Disaster Medicine, Department of SurgeryUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations