Skip to main content
Log in

Designing for flexibility in aviation security systems

  • Published:
Journal of Transportation Security Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The events of September 11th, 2001 launched the world into a new era of aviation security policy, operations, and procedures. The very nature of aviation security makes such operations ill-equipped to rapidly respond to highly agile groups of people intent on inflicting harm to the air transportation system. This article provides an overview of aviation security issues, with a particular focus on what can be done to address the uncertainty inherent within such systems, and where flexibility in security operations and procedures can be used to mitigate such risks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Barnett A (2001) The worst day ever. OR/MS Today 28:28–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett A (2004) CAPPS II: The foundation of aviation security? Risk Anal 24(4):909–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler V, Poole RW Jr., (2002) Rethinking checked-baggage screening. Reason Public Policy Institute, Policy Study No. 297, Los Angeles, CA

  • Chakrabarti S, Strauss A (2002) Carnival booth: an algorithm for defeating the computer-aided passenger screening system. First Monday, 7 (available at www.firstmonday.org)

  • Federal Aviation Administration (2006) FAA Aerospace Forecasts: Fiscal Years 2006–2017, Office of Policy and Plans, Federal Aviation Administration, United States Department of Transportation, Washington, DC

  • Hall M, DeLollis B (2004) Plan to collect flier data canceled. USA Today, 1 (7/14/2004 issue)

  • Hawley K (2008) Testimony, July 24, 2008, before the United States House of Representatives Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee on Aviation, (available at www.tsa.gov/press/speeches/072408_hawley_aviation_security.shtm)

  • Jacoby J (2006) What Israeli security could teach us. The Boston Globe, Globe Newspaper, Company, Boston, MA (available at http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe)

  • Malotky LO (1994) Introduction to the sixth international civil aviation security conference. Journal of Testing and Evaluation 22:235–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martonosi S, Barnett A (2006) How effective is security screening of airline passengers? Interfaces 36(6):545–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead KM (2002) Challenges facing the TSA in implementing the aviation and transportation security act, Report Number CC-2002–088, Office of Inspector General. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead KM (2003) Aviation security costs, transportation security administration, Office of the Inspector General, Report Number CC-2003–066. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1996) Airline passenger security screening. National Academy Press Publication NMAB-482–1, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • R.W. Poole Jr., G. Passantino (2003) A risk-based airport security policy. Reason Public Policy Institute Policy Study No 308, Los Angeles, CA

  • Singer R (2004) Life after death for CAPPS II? Wired News, (available at www.wired.com)

  • Transportation Security Administration (2006) Registered Traveler Program: Business Model, Version 2.1, November 28, 2006. Department of Homeland Security, Arlington, VA

  • U.S. Government Accountability Office (2003) Aviation security: Progress since September 11th, 2001 and the challenges ahead. GAO-03-1150T, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Government Accountability Office (2004) Aviation security: Challenges exist in stabilizing and enhancing passenger and baggage screening operations. GAO-04-440T, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Arnold Barnett (MIT) for his thoughtful comments and feedback on an earlier version of this manuscript. The first author’s research on aviation security has been supported in part by the National Science Foundation (DMI-0114499) and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-07-1-0232). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Government, the National Science Foundation, or the Air Force Office of Scientific Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sheldon H. Jacobson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacobson, S.H., Lee, A.J. & Nikolaev, A.G. Designing for flexibility in aviation security systems. J Transp Secur 2, 1–8 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-009-0022-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-009-0022-7

Keywords

Navigation