Abstract
This article identifies some key issues for new research in transportation security from a political science perspective: network-centric security thinking; infrastructure vulnerability; the dilemma of public/private operation of security screening; policy coordination and market failure; and intermodal security. We argue of the importance of the ‘homeland security dilemma’: the more governments and corporations spend on security, the greater the perception of failure in the event of a low-probability disaster event, hence the greater the risk of investment; consequently actors have an incentive to move transportation security off the public agenda and avoid spending on security.
References
Amoore L (2006) Biometric borders: governing mobilities in the war on terror. Polit Geogr 25(3):336–351
Andreas P (2003) Redrawing the line: borders and security in the twenty-first century. Int Secur 28:278–111
Bazerman M, Watkins M (2005) Airline security, the failure of 9/11, and predictable surprises. Int Public Manag J 8(3):365–377
Bennett CJ (2008) Comparative politics of no-fly lists in the United States and Canada. In: Salter MB (eds) Politics at the airport. University of Minneapolis Press, Minneapolis, 88–122
Bigo D (2002) Security and immigration: toward a critique of the governmentality of unease. Alternatives 27(16):3–92
Birkland TA (1997) After disaster: agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC
Birkland TA (2004) Learning and policy improvement after disaster. Am Behav Sci 48(3):341–364
Clarke SE, Chenoweth E (2006) The politics of vulnerability: constructing local performance regimes for homeland security. Rev Policy Research 23(1):95–114
Cox R (1981) Social forces, states and world orders: beyond international relations theory. Millennium 10(2):126–155
Dempsey PS (2003) Aviation security: the role of law in the war on terror. Columbia J Transnatl Law 41(3):649–733
Easton D (1953) The political system. Alfred Knopf, New York
Elhefnawy N (2004) Societal complexity and diminishing returns in security. Int Secur 29(1):152–174
Erickson CW, Barratt BA (2004) Prudence or panic? Preparedness exercises, counterterror mobilization, and media coverage—dark winter, TOPOFF 1 and 2J. Homeland Security Emerg Manag 1(4):1–21
Flynn SE (2000) Beyond border control. Foreign Aff 79(6):57–68
Flynn SE (2002) America: the vulnerable. Foreign Aff 81(1):60–74
Flynn SE (2004) The neglected home front. Foreign Aff 83(5)
Frederickson GH, LaporteTR (2002) Airport security, high reliability, and the problem of rationality. Public Admin Rev 62(Special issue):33–43
Hainmüller J, LemnitzerJM (2003) Why do Europeans fly safer? The politics of airport security in Europe and the US. Terrorism Polit Violence 15(4):1–36
Hart–Rudman Commission (2001) U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century co-chaired by Gary Hart and Warren Rudman, Road Map for National Security: Imperative for Change: The Phase III Report of the U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century, February 15, 2001
Jervis R (1978) Cooperation under the security dilemma. World Polit 30(2):167–214
Kettl D (2003) Contingent coordination: practical and theoretical puzzles for homeland security. Am Rev Public Adm 33(3):253–277
Lam C (2006) TOPOFF 3 report finds government unable to coordinate response to terrorist attacks. Biosecurity Bioterror 4(2):99–100
Lasswell D (1958) Politics: who gets what, when, how. Meridian, Cleveland, OH
Lippert R, O’Connor D (2003) Security assemblages: airport security, flexible work, and liberal governance. Alternatives 28(1):331–358
Lyon D (2003) Airports as data filters: converging surveillance systems after September 11. Inf Commun Ethics Society 1(1):13–20
Muller B (2004) (Dis)qualified bodies: securitization, citizenship and ‘identity management’. Citizsh Stud 8(3):279–294
Salter MB (2007a) Governmentalities of an Airport. Int Polit Sociol. 1(1):49–66
Salter MB (2007b) SeMS and sensibility: security management systems and the management of risk in the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority. J Air Transp Manag 13(6):389–398
Salter MB (ed) (2008) Politics at the airport. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Seidenstat P (2002) Terrorism, airport security, and the private sector. Public Admin Rev 21(1):275–291
Stasiulis D, Ross D (2006) Security, flexible sovereignty, and the perils of multiple citizenship. Citizsh Stud 10(3):329–348
Johnston V, Seidenstat P, Johnston EW (2006) Transportation security policyPlant. J Handbook of transportation policy and administration. Taylor and Francis, New York 525–536
Walters W (2002) Deportation, expulsion, and the international police of aliens. Citizsh Stud. 6(3):265–292
Webber J (2005) Network-centric security for Canada–US supply chains. Fraser Institute and Washington: Centre for Strategic and International StudiesVancouver, BC
Zacher M, Sutton B (1996) Governing global networks: international regimes for transportation and communications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Salter, M.B. Political science perspectives on transportation security. J Transp Secur 1, 29–35 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-007-0003-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-007-0003-7