Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The intra-industry effects of proxy contests

  • Published:
Journal of Economics and Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we examine the intra-industry effect of proxy contests. Proxy contests convey the information of common industrial risks or expected competitive relationship change. We find significant negative abnormal returns in the group of competitors of target firms with negative abnormal returns, and such negative abnormal returns become larger for similar-size competitors. In contrast, there are no significant abnormal returns for competitors of target firms with positive abnormal returns. These findings are consistent with the information-based theory but not the competitive theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Consistent with Mulherin and Poulsen (1998), we use the equally-weighted CRSP market index. However, we get qualitatively similar results using the value-weighted CRSP market index for value-weighted firm portfolio. These results are available upon request.

References

  • Aharony J, Swary I (1996) Additional evidence on the information-based contagion effects of bank failures. J Bank Financ 20(1):57–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin DV (1965) Proxy contests and corporate reform (No. 47). Bureau of Business Research, University of Michigan

  • Borstadt LF, Zwirlein TJ (1992) The efficient monitoring role of proxy contests: an empirical analysis of post-contest control changes and firm performance. Financial Management 21(3):22–34

  • Brown S, Warner J (1985) Using daily stock returns: the case of event studies. J Financ Econ 14:3–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn JB, Gillan SL, Hartzell JC (2016) On enhancing shareholder control: a (Dodd) Frank assessment of proxy access. J Financ 71(4):1623–1668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins DW, Kothari SP, Rayburn JD (1987) Firm size and the information content of prices with respect to earnings. J Account Econ 9:111–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelo H, DeAngelo L (1989) Proxy contests and the governance of publicly held corporations. J Financ Econ 23:29–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodd P, Warner J (1983) On corporate governance: a study of proxy contests. J Financ Econ 11:401–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faleye O (2004) Cash and corporate control. J Financ 59(5):2041–2060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fos V (2016) The disciplinary effects of proxy contests. Manag Sci 63(3):655–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason CA, Jenkins NT, Johnson WB (2008) The contagion effects of accounting restatements. The Accounting Review 83(1):83–110

  • Gonen I (2003) Intra-industry effects of corrective disclosures: Is mistrust contagious? Working Paper, New York University

  • Harris M, Raviv A (1991) The theory of capital structure. J Financ 46(1):297–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry D, Lakonishok J (1993) Corporate governance through the proxy contest: evidence and implications. J Bus 66(3):405–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Impson M (2005) Contagion effects of dividend reduction or omission announcements in the electric utility industry. Financ Rev 35(1):121–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorion P, Zhang G (2007) Good and bad credit contagion: evidence from credit default swaps. J Financ Econ 84:860–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorion P, Zhang G (2010) Information transfer effects of bond rating downgrades. Financ Rev 45(3):683–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang LHP, Stulz RM (1992) Contagion and competitive intra-industry effects of bankruptcy announcements. J Financ Econ 32:45–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laudano E (2004) One man’s junk mail is another man’s treasure: proxy contests and corporate governance. Connecticut Public Interest Law Journal 3(2):430–455

  • Mukherjee TK, Varela O (1992) Corporate behaviour after the proxy contest for control: the short, intermediate and long term. Manag Financ 18(7/8):77–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee TK, Varela O (1993) Corporate operating performance around the proxy contest. J Bus Financ Acc 20(3):417–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulherin HJ, Poulson AB (1998) Proxy contests and corporate change: implications for shareholder wealth. J Financ Econ 47(3):279–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otchere I, Ross M (2002) Do share buy back announcements convey firm-specific or industry-wide information? A test of the undervaluation hypothesis. Int Rev Financ Anal 11:511–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sridharan UV, Reinganum MR (1995) Determinants of the choice of the hostile takeover mechanism: an empirical analysis of tender offers and proxy contests. Financ Manag 24(1):57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tawatnuntachai O, D’Mello R (2002) Intra-industry reactions to stock split announcement. J Financ Res 25(1):39–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fang Chen.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 8 Variables Used in the Regression

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, F., Huang, J. & Yu, H. The intra-industry effects of proxy contests. J Econ Finan 44, 321–347 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-019-09492-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-019-09492-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation