Abstract
This paper investigates the relation between volatility of CDS and stock prices using a sample of 109 European investment-grade companies, during the period of January 2012 to January 2016. To analyse the volatility relation between CDS and stock prices and its time persistence, we use the Dynamic Conditional Correlation (DCC) model. We also test the volatility spillover hypothesis and investigate the direction of the spillover effect using the BEKK-GARCH model. We find strong evidence in support of the hypothesis that the volatility of CDS and stock prices across European investment-grade companies can be modelled under the dynamic conditional correlation assumption. When we split the volatility into two components, namely, ARCH-effect (that is, short-run persistence of shocks) and GARCH-effect (that is, long-run persistence), we find that, in general, the persistence of correlation is statistically significant, while the impact of innovations (shocks) on correlation is not. Our tests of the volatility spillover hypothesis provide new evidence that the volatility spillover is bi-directional, with the predominant leadership of the European CDS market over the stock market.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Yet, other studies (see e.g., Tang and Yan 2007) find that liquidity effect on CDS spreads is significant with an estimated liquidity premium similar to those of Treasury bonds and corporate bonds.
Price discovery as defined by Figuerola-Ferretti and Paraskevopoulos (2010) is the process of uncovering the asset’s full information or permanent value. The unobservable permanent price reflects the fundamental value of the underlying asset.
Figuerola-Ferretti and Paraskevopoulos (2010) argue that if the VIX index and iTraxx CDS are cointegrated, price discovery may be considered as a dynamic process in search of an equilibrium state. This requires a sudden adjustment of both indexes to new equilibrium for a given arrival of new information. If both markets do not react to new information in the same manner, one may lead the other. When such a lead-lag relationship appears, the leading market is said to provide price discovery.
Schreiber et al. (2012) investigate conditional variances at aggregate index level, instead of an individual company’s level.
In order to estimate the DCC-GARCH and BEKK-GARCH models, we used the R libraries “rmgarch” (for DCC-GARCH) and “mgarch” (for BEKK-GARCH). To estimate BEKK-GARCH model, we may also use another library available - “MTS” but we decided to use “mgarch” since in the empirical literature there are many examples of using “mgarch” (see e,g., Chevallier 2012).
See Katzke (2017), Financial Econometrics Practical, Practical 7: Multi-variate Volatility Modelling, available at http://curiousquant.com/ClassNotes/FinMetrics/Practicals/Practical_7/Practical_7.pdf
iTraxx indexes are standardized contracts with a reference to a fixed number of obligors with shared characteristics. Investors can be long or short of the index, which is equivalent to being protection sellers or buyers. For more information, refer to Markit iTraxx Europe series 24, available at: https://www.markit.com/NewsInformation/NewsAnnouncementsFile?CMSID=6eeeb28203e94f3f83c83d2a58609ab3.
Our preliminary tests show that the models are not well specified. For this reason, we split the whole data set (January 2008 – January 2016) into two sub samples (periods); our tests show that the second period (January 01, 2012 - January 29, 2016) provides much more reliable results. The first period results are available upon request.
We allow for some of the ARCH/GARCH effects not to be statistically significant in the DCC-GARCH(1,1) model in a way that mostly ARCH effects are not significant but not both ARCH and GARCH effects.
The results reported in Appendix B are available upon request.
In this case we analyse the statistical significance of non-diagonal elements of the GARCH-matrix only at the usual levels of significance of 5% and 10%, that is, we estimate the statistical significance of those coefficients that represent the cross-volatility spillover.
References
Baba Y, Engle R F, Kraft D, Kroner K (1990) Multivariate Simultaneous Generalized ARCH. UCSD Department of Economics, unpublished manuscript
Belke A, Gokus C (2014) Volatility patterns of CDS, bond and stock markets before and during the financial crisis: evidence from major financial institutions. Int J Econ Financ 6(7):53–70
Blanco R, Brennan S, Marsh, I (2004) An empirical analysis of the dynamic relationship between investment-grade bonds and credit default swaps. Banco de España Working Papers, No 401
Bollerslev T (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional Heteroskedasticity. J Econ 31(February):307–327
Bollerslev T (1990) Modeling the coherence in short-run nominal exchange rates: a multivariate generalized ARCH model. Rev Econ Stat 72:498–505
Bollerslev T, Engle R, Wooldridge JM (1988) A capital asset pricing model with time varying Covariances. J Polit Econ 96(1):116–131
Chevallier J (2012) Econometric analysis of carbon markets. Springer Science+Business Media B.V
Coudert V, Gex M (2010) Contagion inside the credit default swap market: the case of the GM and ford crisis in 2005. J Int Financ Mark Inst Money 20(2):109–134
Engle R (1982) Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of UK inflation. Econometrica 50(4):987–1008
Engle R (2002) Dynamic conditional correlation: a simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional Heteroskedasticity models. J Bus Econ Stat 20(3):339–350
Engle R, Sheppard K (2001) Theoretical and Empirical Properties of Dynamic Conditional Correlation Multivariate GARCH, NBER Working Paper, No 8554
Fabozzi F, Cheng X, Chen R (2007) Exploring the components of credit risk in credit default swaps. Financ Res Lett 4(March):10–18
Figuerola-Ferretti I, Paraskevopoulos I (2010) Pairing market risk and credit risk. Working paper. Carlos III University, Madrid
ISDA (2008) ISDA Publishes Year-End 2008 Market Survey Results, available at http://www.isda.org/statistics/recent.html, accessed August 17, 2016
ISDA (2009) ISDA Publishes Year-End 2009 Market Survey Results, available at http://www.isda.org/statistics/recent.html, accessed August 17, 2016
Katzke N F (2017). Financial Econometrics Practical, Practical 7: Multi-variate Volatility Modelling available at http://curiousquant.com/ClassNotes/FinMetrics/Practicals/Practical_7/Practical_7.pdf, accessed Sept 08, 2017
Li H, Majerowska E (2006) Stock Market Integration: A Multivariate GARCH Analysis on Poland and Hungary. Kingston upon Thames, Economics Discussion Paper, Kingston University, available at http://eprints.kingston.ac.uk/1628/1/Li-H-1628.pdf, accessed Sept 15, 2017
Longstaff F, Mithal S, Neis E (2005) Corporate yield spreads: default risk or liquidity? New evidence from the credit-default swap market. J Financ 60(5):2213–2253
Mateev M, Marinova E (2018) Relation between credit default swap spreads and stock prices: a non-linear perspective. J Econ Financ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-017-9423-9
Meng L, ap Gwilym O, Varas J (2009) Volatility transmission among the CDS, equity, and bond markets. J Fixed Income 18(3):33–46
Minović J (2010) Empirical Analysis of Volatility and Co-movements in Serbian Frontier Financial Market: MGARCH Approach. South East European Journal of Economics and Business 5(1): 39–55, available at https://www.degruyter.com/downl oadpdf/j/jeb.2010.5.issue-1/v10033-010-0004-5/v10033-010-0004-5.pdf, accessed Sept 16, 2017
Ötker-Robe İ, Podpiera J (2010). The Fundamental Determinants of Credit Default Risk for European Large Complex Financial Institutions. IMF Working Paper, WP/10/153
Scheicher M (2008) How Has CDO Market Pricing Changed During the Turmoil? Evidence from CDS Index Tranches. European Central Bank Working Paper Series, No 910, available at https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp910.pdf?90f5b2182c3959b672dfe94b1ecf6f79, accessed Sept 17, 2017
Schreiber I, Müller G, Klüppelberg C, Wagner N (2012) Equities, credits and volatilities: a multivariate analysis of the European market during the sub-prime crisis. Int Rev Financ Anal 24 (C): 57–65, available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2012.07.006
Tang D, Yan H (2007) Liquidity and Credit Default Swap Spreads. Working Paper, Kennesaw State University and University of South Carolina, 1–41
Toparli E A, Balcilar M (2016) On the Risk Spillover Across the Oil Market, Stock Market, and the Oil Related CDS Sectors: A Volatility Impulse Response Approach. Proceedings of the Middle East Economic Association, Issue 1, 15th International Conference, available at https://www.dohainstitute.edu.qa/MEEA2016/Downloads/Elif%20Akay%20Toparli_Final.pdf, accessed Oct 09, 2017
Tsay R (2014) Multivariate time series analysis with R and financial applications, First edn. Wiley, Hoboken
Ural M, Demireli E (2015) Volatility transmission of credit default swap (CDS) risk premiums. Dumlupinar University Journal of Social Sciences 45(July) available at http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/56094, accessed Oct 09, 2017
Wang P, Moore T (2012) The integration of the credit default swap markets during the US subprime crisis: dynamic correlation analysis. J Int Financ Mark Inst Money 22(1):1–15
Wang, M., Yao Q. (2005) Modelling multivariate volatilities: an ad-hoc method, working paper, London School of Economics and Political Science and Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, available at: http://stats.lse.ac.uk/q.yao/qyao.links/paper/wy04.pdf, accessed Dec 13, 2017
Zhu H (2004) An empirical comparison of credit spreads between the bond market and the credit default swap market. BIS Working Paper, No. 160
Acknowledgements
In the memory of my colleague Dr. Elena Marinova, who was a grood friend and excellent researcher.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mateev, M. Volatility relation between credit default swap and stock market: new empirical tests. J Econ Finan 43, 681–712 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-018-9467-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-018-9467-5