Journal of Economics and Finance

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 582–593 | Cite as

Cigarette smuggling: using the shadow economy or creating its own?

  • Rajeev K. Goel
  • James W. SaunorisEmail author


Cigarette smuggling undermines policymakers’ efforts to curb smoking while also leading to tax revenue leakages. Policymakers around the world are trying to obtain a better understanding of how to combat cigarette smuggling. This paper adds to the literature on cigarette demand and related smuggling by considering the cross-border influences of both the price differentials and the shadow economy. While price/tax differentials induce both casual and organized smuggling, the presence of the shadow economy facilitates smuggling and opens up possibilities for arbitrage in smuggled goods. Using data across U.S. states for the years 1997–2008, results show that border price effects are positive and statistically significant, and the average shadow economy in bordering states facilitates smuggling, with own shadow economy sometimes showing signs of facilitating intra- and cross-border smuggling. The other findings regarding the negative own-price elasticities and habit persistence for smoking are in line with the larger literature.


Cigarettes Smoking Demand Smuggling Elasticity Shadow economy United States 

JEL Classification

D12 H71 K42 L66 


  1. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR) (1985) Cigarette tax evasion: a second look. U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Apergis N, Goel RK, Payne JE (2014) Dynamics of U.S. state cigarette consumption: evidence from panel error correction modeling. Atl Econ J 42(1):3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58(2):277–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baltagi BH, Levin D (1992) Cigarette taxation: raising revenues and reducing consumption. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 3(2):321–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baltagi BH, Levin D (1986) Estimating dynamic demand for cigarettes using panel data: the effects of bootlegging, taxation and advertising reconsidered. Rev Econ Stat 68(1):148–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bishop JM (2018) Does cigarette smuggling prop up smoking rates? Am J Health Econ 4(1):80–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buehn A, Schneider F (2012) Corruption and the shadow economy: like oil and vinegar, like water and fire? Int Tax Public Financ 19(1):172–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calderoni F (2014) A new method for estimating the illicit cigarette market at the subnational level and its application to Italy. Global Crime 15(1–2):51–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cebula RJ, Foley M, Houmes R (2014) Empirical analysis of the impact of cigarette excise taxes on cigarette consumption: estimates from recent state-level data. J Econ Financ 38(1):164–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaloupka FJ, Warner KE (2000) The economics of smoking. In: Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP (eds) Handbook of health economics, vol 1. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 1539–1627Google Scholar
  11. Czart C, Pacula RL, Chaloupka FJ, Wechsler H (2001) The impact of prices and control policies on cigarette smoking among college students. Contemp Econ Policy 19(2):135–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gallet CA, List JA (2003) Cigarette demand: a meta-analysis of elasticities. Health Econ 12:821–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goel RK (2004a) New developments in tobacco research: an introduction. J Econ Financ 28(3):379–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goel RK (2004b) Cigarette demand in Canada and U.S.-Canadian cigarette smuggling. Appl Econ Lett 11(9):537–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goel RK (2008) Cigarette smuggling: price versus non-price incentives. Appl Econ Lett 15(8):587–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goel RK (2012) Effects of generic cigarettes on U.S. cigarette demand and smuggling. Econ Lett 115(1):114–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goel RK, Nelson MA (2007) The Master Settlement Agreement and cigarette tax policy. J Policy Model 29(3):431-438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goel RK, Nelson MA (2008) Global efforts to combat smoking. Ashgate Publishing, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  19. Goel RK, Saunoris JW (2016) Casting a long shadow? Cross-border spillovers of shadow economy across American states. Public Finance Rev 44(5):610–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goel RK, Zhang X (2013) Gender dynamics and smoking prevalence in Japan. J Econ Financ 37(4):622-636Google Scholar
  21. Joossens L, Merriman D, Ross H, Raw M (2010) The impact of eliminating the global illicit cigarette trade on health and revenue. Addiction 105(9):1640–1649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Joossens L, Raw M (1995) Smuggling and cross border shopping of tobacco in Europe. Br Med J 310:1393–1397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Joossens L, Raw M (2012) From cigarette smuggling to illicit tobacco trade. Tob Control 21(2):230–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Orzechowski, Walker (2014) The tax burden on tobacco, historical compilation, vol 49. Arlington, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  25. Prieger JE, Kulick J (2014) Unintended consequences of enforcement in illicit markets. Econ Lett 125(2):295–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Saffer H, Dench D, Dave D, Grossman M (2018) E-cigarettes and adult smoking. NBER working paper no. 24212Google Scholar
  27. Schneider F, Enste DH (2000) Shadow economies: size, causes, and consequences. J Econ Lit 38(1):77–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schneider F, Enste DH (2013) The shadow economy: an international survey. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sung H-Y, Hu T-W, Keeler TE (1994) Cigarette taxation and demand: an empirical model. Contemp Econ Policy 12(3):91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thursby JG, Thursby MC (2000) Interstate cigarette bootlegging: extent, revenue losses, and effects of federal intervention. Natl Tax J 53(1):59–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. U.S. Bureau of Census (various years) Statistical Abstract of the United States, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  32. Wiseman T (2013) US shadow economies: a state-level study. Constit Polit Econ 24(4):310–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yürekli A, Sayginsoy Ö (2010) Worldwide organized cigarette smuggling: an empirical analysis. Appl Econ 42(5):545–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsIllinois State UniversityNormalUSA
  2. 2.Kiel Institute for the World EconomyKielGermany
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsEastern Michigan UniversityYpsilantiUSA

Personalised recommendations