Skip to main content
Log in

An examination of the REIT return–implied volatility relation: a frequency domain approach

  • Published:
Journal of Economics and Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between implied volatility (the VIX) and REIT returns using frequency domain approach which allows shocks to vary across frequency bands. The distinguishing feature of the frequency domain method is that it enables the investigator assess quantitatively the impact of independent variables on the dependent variable at different frequencies across the spectra. The estimates of the parameter of interest from the frequency domain analysis may reveal rich policy implications. Specifically, at issue is whether implied volatility can be used to predict movements in REIT returns at different frequencies in the United States. The results from the frequency domain regression show that implied volatility and REIT returns have significantly negative effect on each other at the low-, medium- and long-term frequencies. Furthermore, the empirical findings from the frequency domain causality tests indicate that causality runs from implied volatility to all and equity REIT returns in the short- and medium-term frequencies but not vice versa. However, it is interesting to note that the results show causality running from mortgage REIT returns to implied volatility in the medium term. Taken together, the results from this study suggest that knowledge of implied volatility can help the investors to predict movements in the capital market and hence, to some extent, they can protect their portfolios against uncertainties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashley R, Verbrugge R (2009) Frequency dependence in regression model coefficients: an alternative approach for modeling nonlinear dynamic relationships in time series. Econ Rev 28(1–3):4–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Avramov D, Chordia T, Goyal A (2006) The impact of trades on daily volatility. Rev Financ Stud 19(4):1241–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badshah IU (2013) Quantile regression analysis of the asymmetric return-volatility relation. J Futur Mark 33(3):235–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekaert G, Wu G (2000) Asymmetric volatility and risk in equity markets. Rev Financ Stud 13(1):1–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentes SR, Vaz S (2013) Relationship between implied volatility and the underlying in major international stock markets. International Journal of Academic Research 5(6):239–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, F. (1976) Studies of stock price volatility changes, Proceedings of the 1976 Meetings of the Business and Economics Statistics Section. 177–81

  • Breitung J, Candelon B (2006) Testing for short- and long-run causality: a frequency- domain approach. J Econ 132(2):363–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns J, Ho C, McCauley RN (2007) Exchange rates and global volatility: implications for Asia-Pacific currencies. BIS Quarterly Review:41–42

  • Campbell JY, Hentschel L (1992) No news is good news: an asymmetric model of changing volatility in stock returns. J Financ Econ 31:281–318

  • Chiang S (2012) The relationships between implied volatility indexes and spot indexes. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 57:231–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie AA (1982) The stochastic behavior of common stock variances: value, leverage and interest rate effects. J Financ Econ 10:407–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciner C (2011) Commodity prices and inflation: testing in the frequency domain. Res Int Bus Financ 25(3):229–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daigler R, Hibbert AM, Pavlova I (2014) Examining the return–volatility relation for foreign exchange: evidence from the euro VIX. J Futur Mark 34(1):74–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Long BJ, Shleifer A, Summers LH, Waldmann RJ (1990) Noise trader risk in financial markets. J Polit Econ 98(4):703–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis P, Mayhew S, Stivers C (2006) Stock returns, implied volatility innovations and the asymmetric volatility phenomenon. J Financ Quant Anal 41(2):381–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott G, Rothenberg T, Stock J (1996) Efficient test for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64:813–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle R (1974) Band spectrum regression. Int Econ Rev 15(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle R (1978) Testing price equations for stability across spectral frequency bands. Econometrica 46(4):869–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming J, Ostdiek B, Whaley RE (1995) Predicting stock market volatility: a new measure. J Futur Mark 15(3):265–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French KR, Schwert GW, Stambaugh R (1987) Expected stock returns and volatility. J Financ Econ 19:3–29

  • Gang J, Li X (2014) Risk perception and equity returns: evidence from the SPX and VIX. Bull Econ Res 66:20–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geweke J (1982) Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series. J Am Stat Assoc 77(378):304–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giot P (2005) Relationships between implied volatility indices and stock index returns. J Portf Manag 31:92–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger CWJ, Lin JL (1995) Causality in the long run. Econometric Theory 11(3):530–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han Q, Guo B, Ryu D, Webb, RI (2012) Asymmetric and negative return volatility relationship: the case of the VKOSPI. Invest Anal J 76:69–78.

  • Hannan E (1963) Regression for time series, in: Ed. M. Rosenblatt, Proceedings of the Symposium on Time Series Analysis. New York. John Wiley and Sons Inc pp 14-37

  • Harvey AC (1978) Linear regression in the frequency domain. Int Econ Rev 19(2):507–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbert AM, Daigler RT, Dupoyet B (2008) Behavioral explanation for the negative asymmetric return–volatility relation. Journal of Banking and Finance 32:2254–2266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosoya Y (1991) The decomposition and measurement of the interdependency between second-order stationary processes. Probab Theory Relat Fields 88(4):429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaniel R, Saar G, Titman S (2008) Individual investor trading and stock returns. J Financ 63:273–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee BS, Ryu D (2013) Stock returns and implied volatility: a new VAR approach. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 7:2013–2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Low C (2004) The fear and exuberance from implied volatility of S&P 100 index options. J Bus 77:527–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padungsaksawasdi C, Daigler R (2014) The return-implied volatility relation for commodity ETFs. J Futur Mark 34(3):261–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips P, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika Trust 75:335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poon SH, Granger CWJ (2003) Forecasting volatility in financial markets: a review. J Econ Lit 41:478–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubbaniy G, Asmeron R, Rizvi S, Naqvi B (2014) Do fear indices help predict stock returns? Quantitative Finance 14(5):831–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan H-B, Ashley R (1999) Detection and modeling of regression parameter variation across frequencies with an application to testing the permanent income hypothesis. Macroecon Dyn 3(1):69–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whaley R (2000) The investor fear gauge. J Portf Manag 26:12–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu G (2001) The determinants of asymmetric volatility. Rev Financ Stud 14(3):837–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang JY, Heo J, Yeo I-S, Lee S-H (2014) Does the implied volatility index have signaling power? Evidence from Mexico, Modern Economy 5:869–877

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuel Anoruo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anoruo, E., Murthy, V.N.R. An examination of the REIT return–implied volatility relation: a frequency domain approach. J Econ Finan 41, 581–594 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-016-9378-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-016-9378-2

Keywords

Navigation