Journal of Economics and Finance

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 327–346 | Cite as

The differing efficiency experiences of banks leading up to the global financial crisis: A comparative empirical analysis from Australia, Canada and the UK

  • Dong Xiang
  • Abul Shamsuddin
  • Andrew C. Worthington


This paper employs a mixed two-stage approach to estimate and explain differences in the cross-country efficiency of ten Australian, five UK and eight Canadian banks over the period 1988 to 2008 using stochastic distance, cost and profit frontiers. The first stage estimates efficiency scores for banks using a common frontier including uncontrollable environmental factors such as per capita national income, bank concentration, capital adequacy, deposit density and the average profit margin. The second stage investigates how controllable firm-specific factors help explain the differences in efficiency. In line with the experience of the banking sector during the recent global financial crisis, the evidence indicates that Australian banks exhibited superior efficiency. Key factors found to positively affect efficiency include intangible assets and the loans-to-deposits and loans-to-assets ratios. Key factors found to negatively affect efficiency include bank size, loan loss provisions, and financial leverage.


Stochastic frontier analysis Technical, cost and profit efficiency Banks 

JEL classification

C23 D24 G21 


  1. Aigner D, Lovell CAK, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production models. J Econ 6:21–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asmild M, Paradi JC, Aggarwall V, Schaffnit C (2004) Combining DEA window analysis with the Malmquist Index approach in a study of the Canadian banking industry. J Product Anal 21:67–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barclay MJ, Smith CW (2001) The capital structure puzzle: another look at the evidence. In: Chew DH (ed) The new corporate finance: where theory meets practice. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Barros CP, Ferreira C, Williams J (2007) Analyzing the determinants of performance of best and worst European banks: a mixed logit approach. J Bank Finance 31:2189–2203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Battese GE, Coelli TJ (1995) A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empir Econ 20:325–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berger AN (2007) International comparisons of banking efficiency. Financ Mark Inst Instrum 16:119–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berger AN, DeYoung R (1997) Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercial banks. J Bank Finance 21:261–300Google Scholar
  8. Berger AN, Mester L (1997) Inside the black box: what explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions? J Bank Finance 21:895–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berger AN, Mester L (2003) Explaining the dramatic changes in performance of US banks: technological change, deregulation, and dynamic changes in competition. J Fin Int 12:57–95Google Scholar
  10. Berger AA, Patti EBD (2006) Capital structure and firm performance: a new approach to testing agency theory and an application to the banking industry. J Bank Finance 30:1065–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carvallo O, Kasman A (2005) Cost efficiency in the Latin American and Caribbean banking systems. J Int Finance Mark Inst Money 15:55–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Casu B, Girardone C (2006) Bank competition, concentration and efficiency in the single European market. Manch Sch 74:441–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Casu B, Molyneux P (2003) A comparative study of efficiency in European banking. App Econ 35:1865–1876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dahmash F, Durand R, Watson J (2009) The value relevance of reliability of reported goodwill and identifiable intangible assets. Br Acc Rev 41:120–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Nicolo G, Bartholomew P, Zaman J, Zephirin M (2004) Bank consolidation, conglomeration and internationalization: trends and implications for financial risk. Finance Mark Inst Inst 13:173–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Demirguc-Kunt A, Detragiache E, Cupta P (2006) Inside the crisis: an empirical analysis of banking systems in distress. J Int Money Finance 25:702–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Demsetz H (1973) Industry structure, market rivalry, and public policy. J Law Econ 16:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dietsch M, Lozano-Vivas A (2000) How the environment determines banking efficiency: a comparison between French and Spanish industries. J Bank Finance 24:985–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grigorian DA, Manole V (2006) Determinants of commercial bank performance in transition: an application of data envelopment analysis. Comp Econ Stud 48:497–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jonghe OD, Vennet RV (2008) Competition versus efficiency: what drives franchise values in European banking? J Bank Finance 32:1820–1835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kasman A, Yildirim C (2006) Cost and profit efficiencies in transition banking: the case of new EU members. App Econ 38:1079–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Koutsomanoli-Filippaki A, Mamatzakis E, Staikouras C (2009a) Profit efficiency under a directional technology distance function approach. Manag Finance 35:276–296Google Scholar
  24. Koutsomanoli-Filippaki A, Mamatzakis E, Staikouras C (2009b) Structural reforms and banking efficiency in the new EU states. J Pol Mod 31:17–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kumbhakar SC, Lovell CAK (2003) Stochastic frontier analysis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Lozano-Vivas A, Pastor JT, Pastor JM (2002) An efficiency comparison of European banking systems operating under different environmental conditions. J Product Anal 18:59–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Margaritis D, Psillaki M (2007) Capital structure and firm efficiency. J Bus Finance Account 34:1447–1469Google Scholar
  28. Maudos J, Guevara JFDM (2007) The cost of market power in banking: social welfare loss vs. cost inefficiency. J Bank Finance 31:2103–2125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oliveira L, Rodrigues LL, Craig R (2010) Intangible assets and value relevance: evidence from the Portuguese stock exchange. Br Account Rev 42:241–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ozkan A (2001) Determinants of capital structure and adjustment to long run target: evidence from UK company panel data. J Bus Finance Account 28:175–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pasiouras F, Tanna S, Zopounidis C (2009) The impact of banking regulations on banks cost and profit efficiency: cross-country evidence. Int Rev Finance Anal 18:294–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Perera S, Skully M, Wickramanayake J (2007) Cost efficiency in South Asian banking: the impact of bank size, state ownership and stock exchange listings. Int Rev Finance 7:35–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reserve Bank of Australia (2009) Financial Stability Review, MarchGoogle Scholar
  34. Schaeck K, Martin C, Simon W (2009) Are competitive banking systems more stable? J Money, Credit, Bank 41:711–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Van den End JW, Tabbae M (2012) When liquidity risk becomes a systemic issue: empirical evidence of bank behavior. J Finance Stab 8:107–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wheelock DC, Wilson PW (2000) Why do banks disappear? The determinants of US bank failures and acquisitions. Rev Econ Stat 82:127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Williams J, Nguyen N (2005) Financial liberalization, crisis, and restructuring: a comparative study of bank performance and bank governance in South East Asia. J Bank Finance 29:2119–2154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yildirim HS, Philippatos GC (2007) Efficiency of banks: recent evidence from the transition economies of Europe, 1993–2000. Eur J Finance 13:123–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zoller W (2000) Researching US regulation of the banking industry through official publications. J Gov Inf 27:559–579Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dong Xiang
    • 1
  • Abul Shamsuddin
    • 2
  • Andrew C. Worthington
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Accounting, Finance and EconomicsGriffith UniversityNathanAustralia
  2. 2.Newcastle Business SchoolUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Accounting, Finance and EconomicsGriffith UniversityNathanAustralia

Personalised recommendations