The determinants of business start-ups in tertiary education: evidence for Greece through a panel data approach

Abstract

Up to now there is no consensus in the relevant literature on the exact factors that lead a student to entrepreneurship. In addition, evidence on differences in the entrepreneurial activity among regions and, even more, in the entrepreneurial education provided by individual universities, within the same region, call for context-specific longitudinal studies. The primary objective of this paper is to provide evidence on the determinants that influence the propensity of young students of a Greek University to establish a new business venture. The methodological approach employed is based on a questionnaire survey collecting data from 1,500 students, spanning the period 2005–2010. Data has been processed through the use of a panel cointegration and panel causality methodology. The empirical findings entail useful insights on students’ attitudes and perceptions of entrepreneurship.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    The original questionnaire was created for the purposes of the “International Innovative Foundations and Entrepreneurship of Students”—GEST– study and it was comprised of 25 questions, which explored 31 hypotheses and 153 variables (for further information, see, for e.g., Ruda et al. 2008).

References

  1. Ajzen I, Madden TJ (1986) Prediction of goal-directed behaviour: attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioural control. J Exp Soc Psychol 22:453–474. doi:10.1177/0013916595275004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Autio E, Keeley KR, Klofsten M, Parker GC, Hay M (2001) Entrepreneurial intent among students in Scandinavia and in the USA. Enterprise Innovat Manag Stud 2:145–160. doi:10.1080/14632440110094632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. AUTM -Association of University Technology Managers (2009). U.S. licensing activity survey: FY 2008

  4. Baron R (2009) Opportunity recognition: evolving theoretical perspectives. In: Lundstrom H, Lohrke F (eds) Historical foundations of research. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baumol WJ (1983) Towards operational models of entrepreneurship. In: Ronen J (ed) Entrepreneurship. Lexington Books, Lexington

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bonnett C, Furnham A (1991) Who wants to be an entrepreneur? A study of adolescents interested in a young enterprise scheme’. J Econ Psychol 12:465–478. doi:10.1016/0167-4870(91)90027-Q

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bosma N, Acs ZJ, Autio E, Coduras A, Levie J (2009). Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2008 executive report. Wellesley, London, Santiago de Chile: Babson College, London Business School, Universidad del Desarrollo. Global Entrepreneurship Research Association (GERA)

  8. Brooksbank D, Jones-Evans D (2005). Graduate entrepreneurship in the UK 2004: a preliminary policy paper based on GEM 2004 data. National Council for Graduate Entrepreneurship

  9. Carland JW, Hoy F, Boulton WR, Carland JC (1984) Differentiating entrepreneurs from small business owners: a conceptualization. Acad Manag Rev 9(3):354–359

    Google Scholar 

  10. Delmar F, Davidsson P (2000) Where do they come from? Prevalence and characteristics of nascent entrepreneurs. Entrepren Reg Dev 12:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Euromonitor International (2010) Regional focus: higher education graduates in Western Europe face poor job prospects http://blog.euromonitor.com/2010/04/regional-focus-higher-education-graduates-in-western-europe-face-poor-job-prospects.html. Accessed 10 December 2010

  12. European Commission (2008a) Survey of entrepreneurship education in higher education in Europe. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/files/support_measures/training_education/highedsurvey_en.pdf. Accessed 6 June 2010

  13. European Commission (2008b) Entrepreneurship in higher education, especially within non-business studies. Final report of the expert group http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/entrepreneurship/support_measures/index.htm. Accessed 12 December 2010

  14. Eurostat (2009) Unemployment by education level http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Unemployment_statistics. Accessed 8 March 2010

  15. Fafaliou I (2010) Entrepreneurial intents among university students: evidence from Greece. Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece, 16–17 September 2010. Academic Conferences International, Academic Publishing Ltd, Reading, pp 190–201

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fayolle A (2005) Evaluation of entrepreneurship education: behaviour performing or intention increasing. Int J Entrepren Small Bus 2(1):89–98. doi:10.1504/IJESB.2011.038562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fielden SL, Davidson MJ, Makin PJ (2000) Barriers encountered during micro and small business start-up in North-West England. J Small Bus Enterprise Dev 7(4):295–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Flash Eurobarometer (2007). Entrepreneurship, Flash EB No 192

  19. GEM-Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (2009). Executive report. http://gemconsortium.org. Accessed 20 January 2010

  20. Hall SG, Milne A (1994) The relevance of P-star analysis to UK monetary policy. Econ J 104(424):597–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Henderson R, Robertson M (2000) Who wants to be an entrepreneur? Young adult attitudes to entrepreneurship as a career. Career Dev Int J 5:279–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hisrich RD, Peters MP (1995) Entrepreneurship: starting, developing, and managing a new enterprise. Irwin, Homewood

    Google Scholar 

  23. Järlström M (2002) Organizational employment versus entrepreneurship: the personality. J Bus Entrepren 14(1) ABI/INFORM Global

  24. Johnson BR (1990) Towards a multidimensional model of entrepreneurship: the case of achievement motivation and the entrepreneur. Entrepren Theor Pract 14(3):39–54. doi:10.1177/0266242606059779

    Google Scholar 

  25. Krueger NF (1993) The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability. Entrepren Theor Pract 18(1):5–21. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00410.x

    Google Scholar 

  26. Krueger NF, Reilly MD, Carsrude A (2000) Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. J Bus Ventur 15(5–6):411–432. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00033-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Llisterri JJ, Kantis H, Angelelli P, Tejerina L (2006) Is youth entrepreneurship a necessity or an opportunity? A first exploitation of household and new enterprise surveys in Latin America. Sustainable Development Department http://www.idisc.net/en/Arcticle.38433.html. Accessed 8 November 2008

  28. Martinez D, Mora JG, Vila LE (2007) Entrepreneurs, the self- employment and employees amongst young European higher education graduates. Eur J Educ 42(1):99–117. doi:10.1111/j.1465-3435.2007.00285.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McClelland D (1961) The achieving society. Van Nostrand, New York

    Google Scholar 

  30. Naffziger DW, Hornsby JS, Kuratko DF (1994) A proposed research model of entrepreneurial motivation. Entrepren Theor Pract 18(3):29–42

    Google Scholar 

  31. NCGE-National Council for Graduate Entrepreneurship (2010) Enterprise and entrepreneurship in higher education: a report of the 2010 study by NCGE and ISBE. November 2010. http://www.ncge.org.uk/publication/enterprise_and_entrepreneurship_in_higher_education_full.pdf Accessed 6 December 2010

  32. Newey WK, West KD (1987) A simple positive semi-definite heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55:703–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. OECD (2009) Evaluation of programmes concerning education for entrepreneurship. Report by the OECD Working Party on SMEs and Entrepreneurship, OECD

  34. Papayannakis L, Kastelli I, Damigos D, Mavrotas G (2008) Fostering entrepreneurship education in engineering curricula in Greece: experience and challenges for a Technical University. Eur J Eng Educ 33(2):199–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pedroni P (1999) Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis, new results. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61:653–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Roberts E, Eesley C (2009) Executive summary—entrepreneurial impact: the role of MIT. Kauffman, the foundation of entrepreneurship, Kansas City http://www.kauffman.org/uploadedFiles/MIT_impact_brief_021709.pdf. Accessed 5 December 2009

  37. Robertson M, Amanda C, Medeira N, Slater J (2003) Barriers to start-up and their effect on aspirant entrepreneurs. Educ Train 45(6):308–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ruda W, Martin Th A, Ascua R, Danko B (2008) Foundation propensity and entrepreneurship characteristics of students in Germany, paper read at ICSB (ed.), Advancing small business and entrepreneurship: from research to results, 2008 International Council for Small Business World Conference Proceedings, Xalifax, Canada, 2008

  39. Shaver KG, Scott LR (1991) Person, process, choice: the psychology of new venture creation. Entrepren Theor Pract 16(2):23–45

    Google Scholar 

  40. Storey DJ, Greene FJ (2010) Small business and entrepreneurship. Pearson Education Limited, London

    Google Scholar 

  41. Toda HY, Phillips CB (1993) Vector autoregression and causality. Econometrica 61:1367–1393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. TVXS (2010) Projections for launch in unemployment in 2010 http://www.tvxs.gr/news. Accessed 2 February 2010

  43. Volkmann C, Wilson KE, Mariotti S, Rabuzzi D, Vyakarnam S, Sepulveda A (2009) Educating the next wave of entrepreneurs—unlocking entrepreneurial capabilities to meet the global challenges of the 21st Century: a report of the global education initiative. World Economic Forum Switzerland, April 2009

  44. Wilson K (2008) Entrepreneurship education in Europe. In OECD entrepreneurship and higher education (Ch 5). OECD iLibrary. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/entrepreneurship-and-higher-education_9789264044104-en. Accessed 17 June 2010

Download references

Acknowledgement

A earlier version of this paper presented at the Academy of Economics and Finance meetings in Jacksonville, February 2011. The authors wish to thank the participants in the session ‘The Business of Education’ for their constructive comments and suggestions. They also thank the Editor as well as a referee from this journal. Their comments really uplifted the quality of the paper. Needless to say, the usual disclaimer applies.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Apergis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Apergis, N., Fafaliou, I. The determinants of business start-ups in tertiary education: evidence for Greece through a panel data approach. J Econ Finan 38, 287–301 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-011-9216-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Would-be Entrepreneurs
  • Students
  • Entrepreneurial Education
  • Panel Data
  • Greece

JEL Classification

  • C33
  • L26
  • A2