Journal of Economics and Finance

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 123–135 | Cite as

Sportsbook pricing and the behavioral biases of bettors in the NHL

Article

Abstract

The betting market for the NHL is investigated using actual betting percentages on favorites and underdogs from real sportsbooks. Sportsbooks do not appear to attempt to price to balance the book as betting percentages are not proportional to set odds. As in the NFL and NBA, bettors are shown to have a strong preference for favorites and road favorites in particular. Simple strategies of betting against significant imbalances toward the favorite are shown to generate positive returns. Although not pricing to balance the book, sportsbooks do not appear to price to exploit known bettor biases in all cases. Clear bettor behavioral biases for road favorites are not priced into the odds as the prices set in these cases appear to be a forecast of game outcomes. Pricing as a forecast may ensure long-run viability for the sportsbook as it discourages entry into this market by informed traders and still allows the sportsbook to capture its commission on losing bets over time.

Keywords

Efficient Markets Sports Betting Sports Gambling Behavioral Finance Behavioral Bias Hockey 

JEL Classification

G1 

References

  1. Gandar J, Zuber R, Johnson RS, Dare W (2002) Re-examining the betting market on major league baseball games: is there a reverse favorite-longshot bias? Appl Econ 34:1309–1317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gandar J, Zuber R, Stafford Johnson R (2004) A Reexamination of the efficiency of the betting market on national hockey league games. J Sports Econ 5(2):152–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Levitt S (2004) Why are gambling markets organized so differently from financial markets? Econ J 114:223–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Pankoff L (1968) Market efficiency and football betting. J Bus 41:203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Paul R, Weinbach A (2007) Does Sportsbook.com set pointspreads to maximize profits? Tests of the Levitt model of sportsbook behavior. Journal of Prediction Markets 1(3):209–218Google Scholar
  6. Paul R, Weinbach A (2008) Price setting in the NBA gambling market: tests of the Levitt model of sportsbook behavior. International Journal of Sports Finance 3(3):2–18Google Scholar
  7. Sauer R, Brajer V, Ferris S, Marr M (1988) Hold your bets: Another look at the efficiency of the gambling market for National Football League games. J Polit Econ 96:206–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Woodland LM, Woodland BM (1994) Market efficiency and the favorite-longshot bias: the baseball betting market. J Financ 49(1):269–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Woodland LM, Woodland BM (2001) Market efficiency and profitable wagering in the national hockey league: can bettors score on longshots? Southern Econ J 67(4):983–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Zuber R, Gandar J, Bowers B (1985) Beating the spread: testing the efficiency of the gambling market for National Football League games. J Polit Econ 93:800–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St. Bonaventure UniversityAlleganyUSA
  2. 2.Coastal Carolina UniversityConwayUSA

Personalised recommendations