Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tumor Cell Mechanosensing During Incorporation into the Brain Microvascular Endothelium

Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering volume 12, pages 455–480 (2019)Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

Tumor metastasis to the brain occurs in approximately 20% of all cancer cases and often occurs due to tumor cells crossing the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The brain microenvironment is comprised of a soft hyaluronic acid (HA)-rich extracellular matrix with an elastic modulus of 0.1–1 kPa, whose crosslinking is often altered in disease states.

Methods

To explore the effects of HA crosslinking on breast tumor cell migration, we developed a biomimetic model of the human brain endothelium, consisting of brain microvascular endothelial cell (HBMEC) monolayers on HA and gelatin (HA/gelatin) films with different degrees of crosslinking, as established by varying the concentration of the crosslinker Extralink.

Results and Discussion

Metastatic breast tumor cell migration speed, diffusion coefficient, spreading area, and aspect ratio increased with decreasing HA crosslinking, a mechanosensing trend that correlated with tumor cell actin organization but not CD44 expression. Meanwhile, breast tumor cell incorporation into endothelial monolayers was independent of HA crosslinking density, suggesting that alterations in HA crosslinking density affect tumor cells only after they exit the vasculature. Tumor cells appeared to exploit both the paracellular and transcellular routes of trans-endothelial migration. Quantitative phenotyping of HBMEC junctions via a novel Python software revealed a VEGF-dependent decrease in punctate VE-cadherin junctions and an increase in continuous and perpendicular junctions when HBMECs were treated with tumor cell-secreted factors.

Conclusions

Overall, our quantitative results suggest that a combination of biochemical and physical factors promote tumor cell migration through the BBB.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Abbreviations

AFM:

Atomic force microscopy

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

AR:

Aspect ratio

BBB:

Blood-brain barrier

BSA:

Bovine serum albumin

DMEM:

Dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium

DMSO:

Dimethyl sulfoxide

ECGS:

Endothelial cell growth supplement

ECM:

Extracellular matrix

FBS:

Fetal bovine serum

GFP:

Green fluorescent protein

HA:

Hyaluronic acid

HBMEC:

Human brain microvascular endothelial cell

JanaP:

Junction Analyzer Program

LOX:

Lysyl oxidase

PBS:

Phosphate buffered saline

RPMI:

Roswell Park Memorial Institute

STR:

Short tandem repeat

TCM:

Tumor conditioned media

TJ:

Tight junctions

VE-cadherin:

Vascular endothelial cadherin

VEGF:

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor

ZO-1:

Zonula occludens-1

References

  1. Abbott, N. J., and A. Friedman. Overview and introduction: the blood-brain barrier in health and disease. Epilepsia 53(Suppl 6):1–6, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Achrol, A. S., R. C. Rennert, C. Anders, R. Soffietti, M. S. Ahluwalia, L. Nayak, S. Peters, N. D. Arvold, G. R. Harsh, P. S. Steeg, and S. D. Chang. Brain metastases. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 5:5, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ajami, N. E., S. Gupta, M. R. Maurya, P. Nguyen, J. Y.-S. Li, J. Y.-J. Shyy, Z. Chen, S. Chien, and S. Subramaniam. Systems biology analysis of longitudinal functional response of endothelial cells to shear stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114:10990–10995, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Akiri, G., E. Sabo, H. Dafni, Z. Vadasz, Y. Kartvelishvily, N. Gan, O. Kessler, T. Cohen, M. Resnick, M. Neeman, and G. Neufeld. Lysyl oxidase-related protein-1 promotes tumor fibrosis and tumor progression in vivo. Cancer Res. 63:1657–1666, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ananthanarayanan, B., Y. Kim, and S. Kumar. Elucidating the mechanobiology of malignant brain tumors using a brain matrix-mimetic hyaluronic acid hydrogel platform. Biomaterials 32:7913–7923, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Arshad, F., L. Wang, C. Sy, S. Avraham, and H. K. Avraham. Blood-brain barrier integrity and breast cancer metastasis to the brain. Patholog. Res. Int. 1–12:2010, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Arvanitis, C., S. Khuon, R. Spann, K. M. Ridge, T.-L. Chew, and L. Kreplak. Structure and biomechanics of the endothelial transcellular circumferential invasion array in tumor invasion. PLoS ONE 9:e89758, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Avraham, H. K., S. Jiang, Y. Fu, H. Nakshatri, H. Ovadia, and S. Avraham. Angiopoietin-2 mediates blood-brain barrier impairment and colonization of triple-negative breast cancer cells in brain. J. Pathol. 232:369–381, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baeyens, N., C. Bandyopadhyay, B. G. Coon, S. Yun, and M. A. Schwartz. Endothelial fluid shear stress sensing in vascular health and disease. J. Clin. Invest. 126:821–828, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barnes, J. M., L. Przybyla, and V. M. Weaver. Tissue mechanics regulate brain development, homeostasis and disease. J. Cell Sci. 130:71–82, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bellail, A. C., S. B. Hunter, D. J. Brat, and E. G. Van Meir. Microregional extracellular matrix heterogeneity in brain modulates glioma cell invasion. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 36:1046–1069, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cai, J., W. G. Jiang, and R. E. Mansel. Phosphorylation and disorganization of vascular-endothelial cadherin in interaction between breast cancer and vascular endothelial cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 4:191–195, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, W., A. D. Hoffmann, H. Liu, and X. Liu. Organotropism: new insights into molecular mechanisms of breast cancer metastasis. Precis. Oncol. 2:4, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cox, T. R., and J. T. Erler. Remodeling and homeostasis of the extracellular matrix: implications for fibrotic diseases and cancer. Dis. Model. Mech. 4:165–178, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Destefano, J. G., J. J. Jamieson, R. M. Linville, and P. C. Searson. Benchmarking in vitro tissue-engineered blood-brain barrier models. Fluids Barriers CNS 15:32, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. DeStefano, J. G., Z. S. Xu, A. J. Williams, N. Yimam, and P. C. Searson. Effect of shear stress on iPSC-derived human brain microvascular endothelial cells (dhBMECs). Fluids Barriers CNS 14:20, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Discher, D. E., P. Janmey, and Y.-L. Wang. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310:1139–1143, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dorland, Y. L., and S. Huveneers. Cell-cell junctional mechanotransduction in endothelial remodeling. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 74:279–292, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dun, M. D., R. J. Chalkley, S. Faulkner, S. Keene, K. A. Avery-Kiejda, R. J. Scott, L. G. Falkenby, M. J. Cairns, M. R. Larsen, R. A. Bradshaw, and H. Hondermarck. Proteotranscriptomic profiling of 231-BR breast cancer cells: identification of potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets for brain metastasis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 14:2316–2330, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Eddy, R. J., M. D. Weidmann, V. P. Sharma, and J. S. Condeelis. Tumor cell invadopodia: invasive protrusions that orchestrate metastasis. Trends Cell Biol. 27:595–607, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Eichler, A. F., E. Chung, D. P. Kodack, J. S. Loeffler, D. Fukumura, and R. K. Jain. The biology of brain metastases-translation to new therapies. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 8:344–356, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fan, J., and B. M. Fu. Quantification of malignant breast cancer cell MDA-MB-231 transmigration across brain and lung microvascular endothelium. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 44:2189–2201, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fazakas, C., I. Wilhelm, P. Nagyoszi, A. E. Farkas, J. Haskó, J. Molnar, H. Bauer, H.-C. Bauer, F. Ayaydin, N. T. K. Dung, L. Siklós, and I. A. Krizbai. Transmigration of melanoma cells through the blood-brain barrier: role of endothelial tight junctions and melanoma-released serine proteases. PLoS ONE 6:e20758, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Grammas, P., J. Martinez, and B. Miller. Cerebral microvascular endothelium and the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases. Expert Rev. Mol. Med. 13:e19, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gray, K. M., D. B. Katz, E. G. Brown, and K. M. Stroka. Quantitative phenotyping of cell-cell junctions to evaluate ZO-1 presentation in brain endothelial cells. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02266-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hagedorn, E. J., J. W. Ziel, M. A. Morrissey, L. M. Linden, Z. Wang, Q. Chi, S. A. Johnson, and D. R. Sherwood. The netrin receptor DCC focuses invadopodia-driven basement membrane transmigration in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 201:903–913, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hamilla, S. M., K. M. Stroka, and H. Aranda-Espinoza. VE-Cadherin-independent cancer cell incorporation into the vascular endothelium precedes transmigration. PLoS ONE 9:e109748, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hielscher, A., K. Ellis, C. Qiu, J. Porterfield, and S. Gerecht. Fibronectin deposition participates in extracellular matrix assembly and vascular morphogenesis. PLoS ONE 11:e0147600, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hoshino, A., et al. Tumour exosome integrins determine organotropic metastasis. Nature 527:329–335, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jamieson, J. J., P. C. Searson, and S. Gerecht. Engineering the human blood-brain barrier in vitro. J. Biol. Eng. 11:37, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kass, L., J. T. Erler, M. Dembo, and V. M. Weaver. Mammary epithelial cell: Influence of extracellular matrix composition and organization during development and tumorigenesis. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 3(39):1987–1994, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Katt, M. E., R. M. Linville, L. N. Mayo, Z. S. Xu, and P. C. Searson. Functional brain-specific microvessels from iPSC-derived human brain microvascular endothelial cells: the role of matrix composition on monolayer formation. Fluids Barriers CNS 15:7, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kienast, Y., L. Von Baumgarten, M. Fuhrmann, W. E. F. Klinkert, R. Goldbrunner, J. Herms, and F. Winkler. Real-time imaging reveals the single steps of brain metastasis formation. Nat. Med. 16:116–122, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim, Y., and S. Kumar. CD44-mediated adhesion to hyaluronic acid contributes to mechanosensing and invasive motility. Mol. Cancer Res. 12:1416–1429, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kohn, J. C. C., D. W. W. Zhou, F. Bordeleau, A. L. L. Zhou, B. N. N. Mason, M. J. J. Mitchell, M. R. R. King, and C. A. A. Reinhart-King. Cooperative effects of matrix stiffness and fluid shear stress on endothelial cell behavior. Biophys. J. 108:471–478, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee, H. J., M. F. Diaz, K. M. Price, J. A. Ozuna, S. Zhang, E. M. Sevick-Muraca, J. P. Hagan, and P. L. Wenzel. Fluid shear stress activates YAP1 to promote cancer cell motility. Nat. Commun. 8:14122, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lee, T.-H., H. Karsenty Avraham, S. Jiang, and S. Avraham. Vascular endothelial growth factor modulates the transendothelial migration of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells through regulation of brain microvascular endothelial cell permeability. J. Biol. Chem. 278:5277–5284, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee, K. Y., Y.-J. Kim, H. Yoo, S. H. Lee, J. B. Park, and H. J. Kim. Human brain endothelial cell-derived COX-2 facilitates extravasation of breast cancer cells across the blood-brain barrier. Anticancer Res. 31:4307–4313, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Leong, H. S., A. E. Robertson, K. Stoletov, S. J. Leith, C. A. Chin, A. E. Chien, M. N. Hague, A. Ablack, K. Carmine-Simmen, V. A. Mcpherson, C. O. Postenka, E. A. Turley, S. A. Courtneidge, A. F. Chambers, and J. D. Lewis. Article invadopodia are required for cancer cell extravasation and are a therapeutic target for metastasis. Cell Rep. 8:1558–1570, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Levental, K. R., H. Yu, L. Kass, J. N. Lakins, M. Egeblad, J. T. Erler, S. F. T. Fong, K. Csiszar, A. Giaccia, W. Weninger, M. Yamauchi, D. L. Gasser, and V. M. Weaver. Matrix crosslinking forces tumor progression by enhancing integrin signaling. Cell 139:891–906, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Li, B., W.-D. Zhao, Z.-M. Tan, W.-G. Fang, L. Zhu, and Y.-H. Chen. Involvement of Rho/ROCK signalling in small cell lung cancer migration through human brain microvascular endothelial cells. FEBS Lett. 580:4252–4260, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mader, C. C., M. Oser, M. A. O. Magalhaes, J. J. Bravo-Cordero, J. Condeelis, A. J. Koleske, and H. Gil-Henn. An EGFR-Src-Arg-cortactin pathway mediates functional maturation of invadopodia and breast cancer cell invasion. J. Cancer Res. 71:OF1–OF12, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Martin, T. A., and W. G. Jiang. Loss of tight junction barrier function and its role in cancer metastasis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1788:872–891, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. McFarlane, S., J. A. Coulter, P. Tibbits, A. O’Grady, C. McFarlane, N. Montgomery, A. Hill, H. O. McCarthy, L. S. Young, E. W. Kay, C. M. Isacke, and D. J. J. Waugh. CD44 increases the efficiency of distant metastasis of breast cancer. Oncotarget 6:11465–11476, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mouw, J. K., G. Ou, and V. M. Weaver. Extracellular matrix assembly: a multiscale deconstruction. Nat. Publ. Gr. 15:771, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Narkhede, A. A., J. H. Crenshaw, R. M. Manning, and S. S. Rao. The influence of matrix stiffness on the behavior of brain metastatic breast cancer cells in a biomimetic hyaluronic acid hydrogel platform. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 106:1832–1841, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Nayak, L., E. Q. Lee, and P. Y. Wen. Epidemiology of brain metastases. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 14:48–54, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Northcott, J. M., I. S. Dean, J. K. Mouw, and V. M. Weaver. Feeling stress: the mechanics of cancer progression and aggression. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 6:17, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Novak, U., and A. H. Kaye. Extracellular matrix and the brain: components and function. J. Clin. Neurosci. 7:280–290, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Onken, M. D., J. Li, and J. A. Cooper. Uveal melanoma cells utilize a novel Route for transendothelial migration. PLoS ONE 9:e115472, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Onken, M. D., O. L. Mooren, S. Mukherjee, S. T. Shahan, J. Li, and J. A. Cooper. Endothelial monolayers and transendothelial migration depend on mechanical properties of the substrate. Cytoskeleton 71:695–706, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Pogoda, K., R. Bucki, F. J. Byfield, K. Cruz, T. Lee, C. Marcinkiewicz, and P. A. Janmey. Soft substrates containing hyaluronan mimic the effects of increased stiffness on morphology, motility, and proliferation of glioma cells. Biomacromolecules 18:3040–3051, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Prestwich, G. D., and C. O. N. Spectus. Evaluating drug efficacy and toxicology in three dimensions: using synthetic extracellular matrices in drug discovery. Acc. Chem. Res. 41:139–148, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Reymond, N., P. Riou, and A. J. Ridley. Rho GTPases and cancer cell transendothelial migration. Methods Mol. Biol. 827:123–142, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Roberts, H. C., T. P. L. Roberts, R. C. Brasch, and W. P. Dillon. Quantitative measurement of microvascular permeability in human brain tumors achieved using dynamic contrast-enhanced mr imaging: correlation with histologic grade. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 21:891–899, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Rodriguez, P. L., S. Jiang, Y. Fu, S. Avraham, and H. K. Avraham. The proinflammatory peptide substance P promotes blood-brain barrier breaching by breast cancer cells through changes in microvascular endothelial cell tight junctions. Int. J. Cancer 134:1034–1044, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Roh-Johnson, M., J. J. Bravo-Cordero, A. Patsialou, V. P. Sharma, P. Guo, H. Liu, L. Hodgson, and J. Condeelis. Macrophage contact induces RhoA GTPase signaling to trigger tumor cell intravasation. Oncogene 33:4203–4212, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Sarrió, D., S. M. Rodriguez-Pinilla, D. Hardisson, A. Cano, G. Moreno-Bueno, and J. Palacios. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer relates to the basal-like phenotype. Cancer Res. 68:989–997, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Shaw, S. K., P. S. Bamba, B. N. Perkins, and F. W. Luscinskas. Real-time imaging of vascular endothelial-cadherin during leukocyte transmigration across endothelium. J. Immunol. 167:2323–2330, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Shumakovich, M. A., C. P. Mencio, J. S. Siglin, R. A. Moriarty, H. M. Geller, and K. M. Stroka. Astrocytes from the brain microenvironment alter migration and morphology of metastatic breast cancer cells. FASEB J. 31:5049–5067, 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Sibony-Benyamini, H., and H. Gil-Henn. Invadopodia: the leading force. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 91:896–901, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Stroka, K. M., and H. Aranda-Espinoza. Neutrophils display biphasic relationship between migration and substrate stiffness. Cell Motil. Cytoskelet. 66:328–341, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Stroka, K. M., H. N. Hayenga, and H. Aranda-Espinoza. Human neutrophil cytoskeletal dynamics and contractility actively contribute to trans-endothelial migration. PLoS ONE 8:61377, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Stroka, K. M., B. Sheng Wong, M. Shriver, J. M. Phillip, D. Wirtz, A. Kontrogianni-Konstantopoulos, and K. Konstantopoulos. Loss of giant obscurins alters breast epithelial cell mechanosensing of matrix stiffness. Oncotarget 5:54004–54020, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Tornavaca, O., M. Chia, N. Dufton, L. O. Almagro, D. E. Conway, A. M. Randi, M. A. Schwartz, K. Matter, and M. S. Balda. ZO-1 controls endothelial adherens junctions, cell-cell tension, angiogenesis, and barrier formation. J. Cell Biol. 208:821–838, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Turitto, V. T. Blood viscosity, mass transport, and thrombogenesis. Prog. Hemost. Thromb. 6:139–177, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Vallenius, T. Actin stress fibre subtypes in mesenchymal-migrating cells. Open Biol. 3:130001, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Vanderhooft, J. L., M. Alcoutlabi, J. J. Magda, and G. D. Prestwich. Rheological properties of cross-linked hyaluronan-gelatin hydrogels for tissue engineering. Macromol. Biosci. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.200800141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Wrobel, J. K., and M. Toborek. Blood–brain barrier remodeling during brain metastasis formation. Mol. Med. 22:32–40, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Yankaskas, C. L., K. N. Thompson, C. D. Paul, M. I. Vitolo, P. Mistriotis, A. Mahendra, V. K. Bajpai, D. J. Shea, K. M. Manto, A. C. Chai, N. Varadarajan, A. Kontrogianni-Konstantopoulos, S. S. Martin, and K. Konstantopoulos. A microfluidic assay for the quantification of the metastatic propensity of breast cancer specimens. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-019-0400-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Ye, M., H. M. Sanchez, M. Hultz, Z. Yang, M. Bogorad, A. D. Wong, and P. C. Searson. Brain microvascular endothelial cells resist elongation due to curvature and shear stress. Sci. Rep. 4:4681, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Yeung, T., P. C. Georges, L. A. Flanagan, B. Marg, M. Ortiz, M. Funaki, N. Zahir, W. Ming, V. Weaver, and P. A. Janmey. Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. Cell Motil. Cytoskelet. 60:24–34, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Yoneda, T., P. J. Williams, T. Hiraga, M. Niewolna, and R. Nishimura. A bone-seeking clone exhibits different biological properties from the MDA-MB-231 parental human breast cancer cells and a brain-seeking clone in vivo and in vitro. J. Bone Miner. Res. 16:1486–1495, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Zhang, P., C. Fu, H. Bai, E. Song, and Y. Song. CD44 variant, but not standard CD44 isoforms, mediate disassembly of endothelial VE-cadherin junction on metastatic melanoma cells. FEBS Lett. 588:4573–4582, 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Zheng Shu, X., Y. Liu, F. S. Palumbo, Y. Luo, and G. D. Prestwich. In situ crosslinkable hyaluronan hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 25:1339–1348, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Toshiyuki Yoneda for generously providing MDA-MB-231-BR cells. The University of Maryland Computer, Mathematical, and Natural Sciences imaging incubator is acknowledged for providing training and equipment for confocal imaging. Kyle Thomas at Yellow Basket, LLC (kyle@yellowbasket.io) is acknowledged for the JAnaP software development support. We also acknowledge Mary Doolin for help with editing custom Matlab code. We thank Dr. William Luscinskas from the Harvard Medical School for generously providing us with the VE-cadherin-GFP adenovirus.

Funding

Funding was provided by Burroughs Wellcome Fund (Career Award at the Scientific Interface). Additional funding was provided by the Ann G. Wylie Dissertation Fellowship from the University of Maryland Graduate School (to MAP), the Fischell Fellowship in Biomedical Engineering (to KMG), the Dr. Mabel S. Spencer Award for Excellence in Graduate Achievement (to KMG), the Clark Doctoral Fellowship (to AJD), the Fischell Department of Bioengineering, and the University of Maryland.

Author Contributions

KMS, MAP, and KMG designed the research. MAP and GMD performed experiments for Fig. 1. GMD analyzed all data for Fig. 1. AJLD performed all experiments and data analysis for Fig. 2, with guidance from MAP. MAP performed confocal microscopy for Fig. 3. KMG performed experiments and analysis for Figs. 4, 5, 6, S2, S3, and S4, with help in analysis from JWJ. KMG prepared Fig. S1. MAP performed experiments and analysis for Figs. 7a–7e. AJLD performed experiments for Figs. 7f–7h, with guidance from MAP, and MAP analyzed data for Figs. 7f–7h. MAP performed confocal microscopy for Fig. 8. MAP and AJLD performed experiments for Fig. 9. MAP performed experiments and all analysis for Fig. 10. MAP performed statistical analysis for Figs. 1, 2, 7, and 10. MAP formatted Figs. 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, and 10. KMG performed statistical analysis and/or formatting for Figs. 4, 5, 6, S2, S3, and S4. MAP, KMG, and KMS wrote the manuscript. All authors edited the manuscript, and all authors reviewed and approved final version of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

MAP, KMG, GMD, AJLD, JWJ, and KMS declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human Studies

No human studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Animal Studies

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Marina A. Pranda and Kelsey M. Gray have contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, 20742, USA

    Marina A. Pranda, Kelsey M. Gray, Ariana Joy L. DeCastro, Jae W. Jung & Kimberly M. Stroka

  2. Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, 20742, USA

    Gregory M. Dawson

  3. Biophysics Program, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, 20742, USA

    Kimberly M. Stroka

  4. Center for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Maryland – Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA

    Kimberly M. Stroka

  5. Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland – Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA

    Kimberly M. Stroka

  6. Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, 3110 A. James Clark Hall, 8278 Paint Branch Drive, College Park, MD, 20742, USA

    Kimberly M. Stroka

Authors
  1. Marina A. Pranda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kelsey M. Gray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ariana Joy L. DeCastro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gregory M. Dawson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jae W. Jung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kimberly M. Stroka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimberly M. Stroka.

Additional information

Associate Editor Michael King oversaw the review of this article.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Kimberly Stroka, in January 2015, joined the Fischell Department of Bioengineering as an Assistant Professor at the University of Maryland, College Park. She received her B.S. in Physics in 2006 from Denison University and her PhD in Bioengineering from the University of Maryland, College Park. She completed her postdoctoral training at Johns Hopkins University in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering and Institute for NanoBioTechnology. Dr. Stroka has received the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship, NIH NRSA F31 predoctoral fellowship, NIH T32 and F32 postdoctoral fellowships, and Burroughs Wellcome Career Award at the Scientific Interface. She also received the Rita Schaffer Young Investigator Award from the Biomedical Engineering Society (2014), Research and Scholarship Award from the UMD Graduate School (2017), “Outstanding Young Scientist Award” from the Maryland Academy of Sciences (2017), and Fischell Department of Bioengineering Faculty Teaching Award (2018). Dr. Stroka’s lab engineers cells and their microenvironment in order to create model systems that allow them to systematically understand fundamental aspects of cellular and tissue mechanobiology, with applications in vascular biomechanics, tumor cell metastasis, and stem cell engineering.

figure a

This article is part of the CMBE 2019 Young Innovators special issue.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 336 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pranda, M.A., Gray, K.M., DeCastro, A.J.L. et al. Tumor Cell Mechanosensing During Incorporation into the Brain Microvascular Endothelium. Cel. Mol. Bioeng. 12, 455–480 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-019-00591-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-019-00591-2

Keywords

search

Navigation