Skip to main content
Log in

Human Corneal Keratocyte Response to Micro- and Nano-Gratings on Chitosan and PDMS

  • Published:
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corneal stroma accounts for major refractive power and the transparency of cornea. This transparency is contributed mainly by the highly ordered arrangement of the extracellular matrix (ECM), particularly the collagen fibrils. Shortage and complications of cornea transplantation have remained an issue for decades. Attempts to produce tissue-engineered cornea are met with challenges, one of which is to induce alignment of stromal ECM produced by keratocytes. In this study, human corneal keratocyte response toward substrate topography on two different materials was examined. Primary human keratocytes were cultured on chitosan and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) surface patterned with anisotopic topography of gratings in various widths. Cell response in the form of alignment, elongation and proliferation were analyzed. Collagen I deposition was imaged and the gene expression analysis of keratocytes cultured on PDMS were studied. On both chitosan and PDMS, keratocytes were found to be aligned and elongated in grating direction. Proliferation rate was reduced as grating width decreased. Aldehyde-3-dehydrogenase (ALDH3) expression was increased on nanogratings. Deposited collagen I followed the keratocyte orientation, which was aligned along the direction of gratings. In conclusion, keratocytes responded similarly to topographical cues when presented on materials with different surface chemistry and stiffness and nanogratings were observed to be more efficient in inducing these responses than microgratings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agnihotri, S. A., N. N. Mallikarjuna, and T. M. Aminabhavi. Recent advances on chitosan-based micro- and nanoparticles in drug delivery. J. Control. Release 100(1):5–28, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Armani, D., C. Liu, and N. Aluru. Re-configurable fluid circuits by PDMS elastomer micromachining. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), 1999, pp. 222–227.

  3. Benedek, G. B. Theory of Transparency of the Eye. Appl. Opt. 10(3):459–473, 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Billmeyer, F. W. Textbook of Polymer Science (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Birk, D. E., J. M. Fitch, and T. F. Linsenmayer. Organization of collagen types I and V in the embryonic chicken cornea. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 27(10):1470–1477, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Birk, D. E., et al. Collagen fibrillogenesis in vitro: interaction of types I and V collagen regulates fibril diameter. J. Cell Sci. 95(4):649–657, 1990.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Borene, M. L., V. H. Barocas, and A. Hubel. Mechanical and cellular changes during compaction of a collagen-sponge-based corneal stromal equivalent. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 32(2):274–283, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chung, H. J., and T. G. Park. Surface engineered and drug releasing pre-fabricated scaffolds for tissue engineering. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 59(4–5):249–262, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Clyne, A. M. Thermal processing of tissue engineering scaffolds. J. Heat Transfer 133(3):034001, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. de Britto, D., and O. B. G. de Assis. Synthesis and mechanical properties of quaternary salts of chitosan-based films for food application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 41(2):198–203, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Discher, D. E., P. Janmey, and Y. L. Wang. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310(5751):1139–1143, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Engler, A. J., et al. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126(4):677–689, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fini, M. E. Keratocyte and fibroblast phenotypes in the repairing cornea. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 18(4):529–551, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Foster, C. S., D. T. Azar, and C. H. Dohlman (eds.). Smolin and Thoft’s The Cornea Scientific Foundations and Clinical Practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, p. 1295, 2005.

  15. Fu, J., et al. Mechanical regulation of cell function with geometrically modulated elastomeric substrates. Nat. Methods 7(9):733–736, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fuard, D., et al. Optimization of poly-di-methyl-siloxane (PDMS) substrates for studying cellular adhesion and motility. Microelectron. Eng. 85(5–6):1289–1293, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Guilak, F., et al. Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. Cell Stem Cell 5(1):17–26, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hahnel, C. P. D., et al. The keratocyte network of human cornea: a three-dimensional study using confocal laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. Cornea 19(2):185–193, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hassell, J. R., and D. E. Birk. The molecular basis of corneal transparency. Exp. Eye Res. 91(3):326–335, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hu, W., et al. Effects of nanoimprinted patterns in tissue-culture polystyrene on cell behavior. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B: Microelectron. Nanomet. Struct. 23(6):2984–2989, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jester, J. V., et al. Corneal keratocytes: in situ and in vitro organization of cytoskeletal contractile proteins. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 35(2):730–743, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jester, J., et al. The cellular basis of corneal transparency: evidence for ‘corneal crystallins’. J. Cell Sci. 112(5):613–622, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Khalid, M. N., et al. Water state characterization, swelling behavior, thermal and mechanical properties of chitosan based networks. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 15(5):425–432, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Krachmer, J., M. Mannis, and E. Holland. Cornea Fundamentals, Diagnosis, and Management (2nd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby, pp. 3–26, 2005.

  25. Maurice, D. M. The structure and transparency of the cornea. J. Physiol. 136(2):263–286, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Moller-Pedersen, T. Keratocyte reflectivity and corneal haze. Exp. Eye Res. 78(3):553–560, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Muller, L. J., L. Pels, and G. F. J. M. Vrensen. Novel aspects of the ultrastructural organization of human corneal keratocytes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 36(13):2557–2567, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nishida, T., et al. Interactions of extracellular collagen and corneal fibroblasts: morphologic and biochemical changes of rabbit corneal cells cultured in a collagen matrix. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. 24(10):1009–1014, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pei, Y., R. Y. Reins, and A. M. McDermott. Aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) 3A1 expression by the human keratocyte and its repair phenotypes. Exp. Eye Res. 83(5):1063–1073, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pot, S. A., et al. Nanoscale topography–induced modulation of fundamental cell behaviors of rabbit corneal keratocytes, fibroblasts, and myofibroblasts. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 51(3):1373–1381, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Qazi, Y., et al. Corneal transparency: genesis, maintenance and dysfunction. Brain Res. Bull. 81(2–3):198–210, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rickett, T. A., et al. Rapidly photo-cross-linkable chitosan hydrogel for peripheral neurosurgeries. Biomacromolecules 12(1):57–65, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Saez, A., et al. Rigidity-driven growth and migration of epithelial cells on microstructured anisotropic substrates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104(20):8281–8286, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tatsuno, I., A. Hirai, and Y. Saito. Cell-anchorage, cell cytoskeleton, and Rho-GTPase family in regulation of cell cycle progression. Prog. Cell Cycle Res. 4:19–25, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Toworfe, G. K., et al. Fibronectin adsorption on surface-activated poly(dimethylsiloxane) and its effect on cellular function. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 71(3):449–461, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Trinkaus-Randall, V., and M. A. Nugent. Biological response to a synthetic cornea. J. Control. Release 53(1–3):205–214, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Xia, W., et al. Biological activities of chitosan and chitooligosaccharides. Food Hydrocolloids 25(2):170–179, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yeung, T., et al. Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 60(1):24–34, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yim, E. K. F., S. W. Pang, and K. W. Leong. Synthetic nanostructures inducing differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into neuronal lineage. Exp. Cell Res. 313:1820–1829, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yim, E. K. F., et al. Nanopattern-induced changes in morphology and motility of smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 26(26):5405–5413, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yim, E. K. F., et al. Nanotopography-induced changes in focal adhesions, cytoskeletal organization, and mechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 31:1299–1306, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by National Medical Research Council Singapore NMRC/NIG/0037/2008, and partly supported by the Mechanobiology Institute Singapore for SK. The authors would like to thank E. L. S. Fong for her assistance and helpful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evelyn K. F. Yim.

Additional information

Associate Editors Mian Long & Fan Yuan oversaw the review of this article.

S. Koo and S. J. Ahn contributed equally to the work.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 62 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koo, S., Ahn, S.J., Zhang, H. et al. Human Corneal Keratocyte Response to Micro- and Nano-Gratings on Chitosan and PDMS. Cel. Mol. Bioeng. 4, 399–410 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-011-0186-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-011-0186-7

Keywords

Navigation