Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A practical method to simulate realistic reduced-exposure CT images by the addition of computationally generated noise

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Radiological Physics and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) scanning protocols should be optimized to minimize the radiation dose necessary for imaging. The addition of computationally generated noise to the CT images facilitates dose reduction. The objective of this study was to develop a noise addition method that reproduces the complexity of the noise texture present in clinical images with directionality that varies over images according to the underlying anatomy, requiring only Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) images as input data and commonly available phantoms for calibration. The developed method is based on the estimation of projection data by forward projection from images, the addition of Poisson noise, and the reconstruction of new images. The method was validated by applying it to images acquired from cylindrical and thoracic phantoms using source images with exposures up to 49 mAs and target images between 39 and 5 mAs. 2D noise spectra were derived for regions of interest in the generated low-dose images and compared with those from the scanner-acquired low-dose images. The root mean square difference between the standard deviations of noise was 4%, except for very low exposures in peripheral regions of the cylindrical phantom. The noise spectra from the corresponding regions of interest exhibited remarkable agreement, indicating that the complex nature of the noise was reproduced. A practical method for adding noise to CT images was presented, and the magnitudes of noise and spectral content were validated. This method may be used to optimize CT imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography- An increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Elhamiasl M, Nuyts J. Low-dose x-ray CT simulation from an available higher-dose scan. Phys Med Biol. 2020;65: 135010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim CW, Kim JH. Realistic simulation of reduced-dose CT with noise modelling and sonogram synthesis using DICOM CT images. Med Phys. 2014;41:011901–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kalendar WA, Wolf H, Suess C, et al. Dose reduction in CT by on-line tube current control: principles and validation on phantoms and cadavers. Eur Radiol. 1999;9:323–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Singh S, Kalra MK, Moore MA, et al. Dose reduction and compliance with pediatric CT protocols adapted to patient size, clinical indication and number of prior studies. Radiology. 2009;252:200–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Karmazyn B, Frush DP, Applegate KE, et al. CT with a computer-simulated dose reduction technique for detection of pediatric nephroureterolithiasis: comparison of standard and reduced radiation doses. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:143–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guimaraes LS, Fletcher JG, Harmsen WS, et al. Appropriate patient selection at abdominal dual-energy CT using 80 kV: relationship between patient size, image noise and image quality. Radiology. 2010;257:732–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Riederer SJ, Pelc NJ, Chesler DA. The noise power spectrum in computed X-ray tomography. Phys Med Biol. 1978;23:446–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hanson KM. Detectability in computed tomographic images. Med Phys. 1979;6:441–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kijewski MF, Judy PF. The noise power spectrum of CT images. Phys Med Biol. 1987;32:565–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hsieh J. Nonstationary noise characteristics of the helical scan and its impact on image quality and artifacts. Med Phys. 1997;24:1375–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wunderlich A, Noo F. Image covariance and lesion detectability in direct fan-beam X-ray computed tomography. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53:2471–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Baek J, Pelc NJ. The noise power spectrum in CT with direct fan beam reconstruction. Med Phys. 2010;37:2074–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Frush DP, Slack CC, Hollingsworth CL, et al. Computer-simulated radiation dose reduction for abdominal multidetector CT of pediatric patients. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:1107–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kalendar WA, Buchenau S, Deak P, et al. Technical approaches to the optimisation of CT. Physica Med. 2008;24:71–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hanson KM. Spectral analysis of non-stationary CT noise, International Symposium and Course on Computed Tomography, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Las Vagas, [Los Alamos National Laboratory Web Site]. April 9, 1980. Available at https://kmh-lanl.hansonhub.com/talks/ct80.abs.html. Accessed August 31, 2021.17.

  17. Britten AJ, Crotty M, Kiremidjian A, et al. The addition of computer simulated noise to investigate radiation dose and image quality in images with spatial correlation of statistical noise: an example application to X-ray CT of the brain. Br J Radiol. 2004;77:323–238.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Massoumzadeh P, Don S, Hildebolt CF, et al. Validation of CT dose-reduction simulation. Med Phys. 2009;36:174–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Joemai RM, Geleijns J, Veldkamp WJ. Development and validation of a low dose simulator for computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:958–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yu L, Shiung M, Jondal D, et al. Development and validation of a practical lower-dose-simulation tool for optimizing computed tomography scan protocols. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012;36:477–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zabic S, Wang Q, Morton T, et al. A low-dose simulation tool for CT systems with energy integrating detectors. Med Phys. 2013;40: 031102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zeng D, Huang J, Bian Z, et al. A simple low-dose x-ray CT simulation from high-dose scan. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2015;65:2226–33.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Takenaga T, Katsuragawa S, Goto M, et al. A computer simulation method for low-dose CT images by use of real high-dose images: a phantom study. Radiol Phys Technol. 2016;9:44–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Naziroglu RE, van Ravesteijn VF, van Vliet LJ, et al. Simulation of scanner-and patient-specific low-dose CT imaging from existing CT images. Phys Medica. 2017;36:12–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hsieh J. Computed tomography principles, design, artefacts and recent advances. Bellingham, Washington, USA: SPIE Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bracewell RN, Imaging T-D. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice Hall; 1995. p. 505–37.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lim JS, Signal T-D, Processing I. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice Hall; 1990. p. 42–5.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Boone JM, Brink JA, et al. Radiation dose and image-quality assessment in computed tomography, journ. ICRU. 2012;12:121–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lathi BP. Modern Digital and Analog Communication Systems. New York: Holt Saunders; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Platten D, Understanding Imaging Performance (3); Artefacts, ImPACT course, [ImPACT CT scanner evaluation group Web Site]. Oct 2005. Available at http://www.impactscan.org/slides/impactcourse/artefacts/index.html. Accessed August 31, 2021.

  31. Yang W, Zhang JY, Wu J, et al. Improving low-dose CT image using residual convolutional network. IEEE Spec Sect Adv Sign Process Methods Med Imag. 2017;5:24698–705.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Han Y, Framing YJC. U-Net via deep convolutional framelets: Application to sparse-view CT. IEEE Trans Med Imag. 2018;37:1418–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu B, Liu J. Overview of Image Denoising Based on Deep Learning. J Phys Conf Ser. 2019;1176:22010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully thank Andy Rogers for assistance with scanning and the CT department at Nottingham City Hospital for access to their CT scanners.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK

    Nicholas Mark Gibson

  2. Physics and Mathematics, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Lane, Clifton, Nottingham, NG11 8NS, UK

    Amy Lee & Martin Bencsik

Authors
  1. Nicholas Mark Gibson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amy Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martin Bencsik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Mark Gibson.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors did not receive support or funding from any organization for the submitted work.

The authors have no relevant financial, non-financial or competing interests to disclose.

Ethics approval

This study did not involve any human participants, therefore, no ethical approval was required.

Informed consent

This study did not involve any human participants therefore no informed consent was required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 54 KB)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gibson, N.M., Lee, A. & Bencsik, M. A practical method to simulate realistic reduced-exposure CT images by the addition of computationally generated noise. Radiol Phys Technol 17, 112–123 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-023-00755-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-023-00755-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation