Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Novel method for calculating the effective dose using size-specific dose estimates conversion factors in abdomen–pelvis computed tomography

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Radiological Physics and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a novel method for calculating the effective dose that closely reflects the individual attenuation, utilizing two conversion coefficients. A total of 180 adult patients who underwent abdomen–pelvis computed tomography were categorized into six groups based on sex and body type. The effective dose was calculated by multiplying the dose-length product with the effective dose conversion coefficient and the size-specific dose estimate conversion factor. The effective dose calculated using a simulation-based dose calculator (WAZA-ARI) was employed as the reference value. The following values, obtained through both methods, were compared within each category: distribution of the effective dose, median effective dose, and relative difference in median effective dose across additional body mass index (BMI) categories. For male patients, no significant disparity was observed in the median effective doses calculated using the two methods. The relative differences in median effective doses across additional BMI categories ranged from – 5 to 6%. Conversely, among female patients, the median effective dose calculated using our method slightly undercut that calculated using WAZA-ARI, with relative differences ranging from – 16 to – 9%. Additionally, relative differences in median effective dose across additional BMI categories ranged from – 18 to – 7%. The median effective dose differed slightly depending on the calculation method because of the different reference phantoms applied in dose calculations. Our proposed method is sensitive to individual size and helps compute a size-specific effective dose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Atomic Energy Agency. Status of computed tomography dosimetry for wide cone beam scanners. IAEA Human Health Reports No.5, 2011.

  2. Kalender WA. Dose in x-ray computed tomography. Phys Med Biol. 2011;59:129–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;176:289–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bauhs JA, Vrieze TJ, Primak AN, Bruesewitz MR, Mccollough CH. CT dosimetry: comparison of measurement techniques and devices. Radiographics. 2008;28:245–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. ICRP. Recommendations of the ICRP. Publication 26. Ann. ICRP 1, 1977.

  6. Mccollough CH, Schueler BA. Calculation of effective dose. Med Phys. 2000;27:828–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Huda W, Vance A. Patient radiation doses from adult and pediatric CT. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:540–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. ICRP. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann. ICRP 21, 1991.

  9. ICRP. Use of dose quantities in radiological protection. ICRP Publication 147. Ann. ICRP 50, 2021.

  10. Ban N, Takahashi F, Sato K, Endo A, Ono K, Hasegawa T, Yoshitake T, Katsunuma Y, Kai M. Development of a web-based CT dose calculator: WAZA-ARI. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2011;147:333–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. ImPACT. Available on http://www.impactscan.org/ctdosimetry.htm. Accessed 20 Apr 2023.

  12. Segars WP, Sturgeon G, Mendonca S, Grimes J, Tsui BM. 4D XCAT phantom for multimodality imaging research. Med Phys. 2010;37:4902–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. ICRP. Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). ICRP Publication 102. Ann. ICRP 37, 2007.

  14. Cros M, Joemai RM, Geleijns J, Molina D, Salvadó M. SimDoseCT: dose reporting software based on Monte Carlo simulation for a 320 detector-row cone-beam CT scanner and ICRP computational adult phantoms. Phys Med Biol. 2017;62:6304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ban N, Takahashi F, Ono K, Hasegawa T, Yoshitake T, Katsunuma Y, Sato K, Endo A, Kai M. WAZA-ARI: computational dosimetry system for X-ray CT examinations II: development of web-based system. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2011;146:244–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bongartz GGSJ, Golding SJ, Jurik AG, Leonardi M, Van Persijn Van Meerten E, Rodríguez R, Panzer W. European guidelines for multi slice computed tomography. European Commission 2004.

  17. Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M. National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol. 2006;79:968–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shrimpton PC, Jansen JT, Harrison JD. Updated estimates of typical effective doses for common CT examinations in the UK following the 2011 national review. Br J Radiol. 2016;89:20150346.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. The Measurement, Reporting, and Management of Radiation Dose in CT. AAPM Report No.96, 2008.

  20. Shrimpton PC, Wall BF, Yoshizumi TT, Hurwitz LM, Goodman PC. Effective dose and dose-length product in CT. Radiology. 2009;250:604–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. ICRP. Adult reference computational phantoms. ICRP Publication 110. Ann. ICRP 39, 2009.

  22. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Use of water equivalent diameter for calculating patient size and size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in CT. AAPM Report No.220, 2014.

  23. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in Pediatric and Adult Body CT Examinations. AAPM Report No.204, 2011.

  24. Samei E, Zhang Y, Christianson O. Comment on “Comparison of patient specific dose metrics between chest radiography, tomosynthesis, and CT for adult patients of wide ranging body habitus” [Med. Phys. 41 (2), 023901 (12pp.) (2014)]. Med Phys. 2015;42:2094.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Khatonabadi M, Kim HJ, Lu P, McMillan KL, Cagnon CH, DeMarco JJ, McNitt-Gray MF. The feasibility of a regional CTDIvol to estimate organ dose from tube current modulated CT exams. Med Phys. 2013;40: 051903.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Khatonabadi M, Zhang D, Cagnon CH, DeMarco JJ, McNitt-Gray MF. Water equivalent diameter (Dw) as a patient size metric for estimating organ dose to patients undergoing CT exams. In: Oral Presentation, 98th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of the Radio logical Society of North America (RSNA) 2012.

  27. Supanich M, Peck D. Size-specific dose estimate as an indicator of absorbed organ dose in CT abdomen and pelvis studies. In: Radiological Society of North American Scientific Assembly (RSNA) and Annual Meeting Program 2012.

  28. Bria M, Samuel L, Amy E, Robert A. Size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) provides a simple method to calculate organ dose for pediatric CT examinations. Med Phys. 2014;41: 071917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. WAZA-ARI. Available on https://waza-ari.nirs.qst.go.jp/. Accessed 20 Apr 2023.

  30. Sato K, Takahashi F. The contemporary JAEA Japanese voxel phantoms. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2012;149:43–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. ICRP. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP 37, 2007.

  32. Christiane S, Timothy P. Evaluation of AAPM Reports 204 and 220: estimation of effective diameter, water-equivalent diameter, and ellipticity ratios for chest, abdomen, pelvis, and head CT scans. Med Phys. 2018;19:228–38.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yawi 3D. Available on http://yawi3d.sourceforge.net/index.php. Accessed 20 Apr 2023.

  34. Zhang Y, Li X, Segars WP, Samei E. Organ doses, effective doses, and risk indices in adult CT: comparison of four types of reference phantoms across different examination protocols. Med Phys. 2012;39:3404–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Leng S, Shiung M, Duan X, Yu L, Zhang Y, Mccollough CH. Size-specific dose estimates for chest, abdominal, and pelvic CT: effect of intrapatient variability in water-equivalent diameter. Radiology. 2015;276:184–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rothman KJ. BMI-related errors in the measurement of obesity. Int J Obes. 2008;32:56–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Available on https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/XrayMassCoef/tab4.html. Accessed 20 Apr 2023.

  38. McKetty MH. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. X-ray attenuation RadioGraphics. 1998;18:151–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fukunaga M, Matsubara K, Yamaguchi Y. Organ and effective dose using automatic organ dose estimation software for lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography. Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2022;78:1176–86 (in Japanese).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Japanese Red Cross Sendai Hospital, 2-43-3, Yagiyamahoncho, Taihaku-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 982-8501, Japan

    Kentaro Funashima & Shigeru Abiko

  2. Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-Machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8575, Japan

    Kazuhiro Sato

Authors
  1. Kentaro Funashima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shigeru Abiko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kazuhiro Sato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kentaro Funashima.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical approval

This research study was conducted retrospectively from data obtained for clinical purposes. The methodology for this study was approved by the Ethics committee of the Sendai Red Cross Hospital (Ethics approval number: 165).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Funashima, K., Abiko, S. & Sato, K. Novel method for calculating the effective dose using size-specific dose estimates conversion factors in abdomen–pelvis computed tomography. Radiol Phys Technol 16, 506–515 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-023-00738-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-023-00738-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation