Skip to main content
Log in

Noise power spectrum in compressed sensing magnetic resonance imaging

  • Published:
Radiological Physics and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Compressed sensing magnetic resonance imaging (CS-MRI) uses random undersampling and nonlinear iterative reconstruction. This study was conducted to clarify the noise power spectrum (NPS) characteristics of CS-MRI. We measured two-dimensional (2D) NPS of CS-MRI with various acceleration factors (AF) and denoising factors (DF) and compared their appearance to those of conventional parallel MR images. Results showed that the 2D NPS of CS-MRI exhibited the following characteristics: (1) local decrease in the low-frequency region, (2) gradual decrease in the high-frequency region, and (3) a stripe pattern aligned at unequal intervals in the phase-encoding direction. Specifically, the 2D NPS of CS-MRI reflects the random undersampling pattern of k-space data. Additionally, 2D NPS allowed visualization of AF-dependent noise characteristics of CS-MRI. Furthermore, 1D NPS graph shapes clarified the CS-MRI noise characteristic dependence on AF and DF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McVeigh ER, Henkelman RM, Bronskill MJ. Noise and filtration in magnetic resonance imaging. Med Phys. 1985;12:586–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Murphy BW, Carson PL, Ellis JH, Zhang YT, Hyde RJ, Chenevert TL. Signal-to-noise measures for magnetic resonance imagers. Magn Reson Imaging. 1993;11:425–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Association NEM. NEMA Standards Publication MS 1–2008 (R2014): determination of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging. Rosslyn: National Electrical Manufacturers Association; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Price RR, Axel L, Morgen T, Newman R, Perman W, Schneiders N, Selikson M, Wood M, Thomas SR. Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance imaging: report of AAPM Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Task Group No. 1. Med Phys. 1990;17:287–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ichinoseki Y, Nagasaka T, Miyamoto K, Tamura H, Mori I, Machida Y. Noise power spectrum in PROPELLER MR Imaging. Magn Reson in Med Sci. 2015;14:235–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1999;42:952–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, Nittka M, Jellus V, Wang J, Kiefer B, Haase A. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med. 2002;47:1202–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhagat YA, Emery DJ, Naik S, Yeo T, Beaulieu C. Comparison of generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions and modified sensitivity encoding for diffusion tensor imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:293–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu K, Dougherty RF, Wu H, Middione MJ, Takahashi AM, Zhang T, Pauly JM, Kerr AB. Hybrid-space SENSE reconstruction for simultaneous multi-slice MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016;35:1824–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Talagala SL, Sarlls JE, Liu S, Inati SJ. Improvement of temporal signal-to-noise ratio of GRAPPA accelerated EPI using a FLASH based calibration scan. Magn Reson Med. 2016;75(6):2362–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Imai H, Miyati T, Ogura A, Doi T, Tsuchihashi T, Machida Y, Kobayashi M, Shimizu K, Kitou Y. Signal-to-noise ratio measurement in parallel MRI with subtraction mapping and consecutive methods. Nihon Houshasen Gijutsugai Zasshi. 2008;64(8):930–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goernera FL, Clarke GD. Measuring signal-to-noise ratio in partially parallel imaging MRI. Med Phys. 2011;38:5049–5057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Donoho DL. Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans Inform Theory. 2006;52(4):1289–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM. Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2007;58:1182–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang Y, Liu F, Xu W, Crozier S. Compressed sensing MRI via two-stage reconstruction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015;62:110–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kojima S, Shinohara H, Hashimoto T, Suzuki S. Undersampling patterns in k-space for compressed sensing MRI using two-dimensional Cartesian sampling. Radiol Phys Technol. 2018;11:303–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ichinoseki Y, Machida Y. Relation between one- and two-dimensional noise power spectra of magnetic resonance images. Radiol Phys Technol. 2017;10:161–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ms. Nodoka Ichikawa for her assistance with this study. This work was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant 15K08688 and 18K07703).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junji Takahashi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takahashi, J., Machida, Y., Aoba, M. et al. Noise power spectrum in compressed sensing magnetic resonance imaging. Radiol Phys Technol 14, 93–99 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-021-00608-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-021-00608-4

Keywords

Navigation