Skip to main content
Log in

Development of voxel-based optimization diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and comparison with conventional DKI

  • Published:
Radiological Physics and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aims of this study were to implement voxel-based optimization diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and evaluate the accuracy of the method for the analysis of diffusion imaging data in comparison with conventional DKI. Conventional DKI and voxel-based optimization DKI were tested on a phantom and a human in a 1.5 T whole-body scanner. The differences in the diffusion coefficient (D) and diffusion kurtosis (K) values were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test, and the Holm correction was applied to the statistical analyses. In the phantom study, the D value resulting from voxel-based optimization DKI was significantly lower than those from conventional DKI in water and agarose solutions at concentrations of 50 and 100 g/L (all p < 0.01). Moreover, the K value was significantly lower in the water and agarose solutions at concentrations of 50, 100, and 200 g/L (all p < 0.01). In the human study, the D value resulting from voxel-based optimization DKI was significantly lower than that of conventional DKI in both white matter (WM), and gray matter (GM) (all p < 0.01). Moreover, the K value was significantly lower in cerebrospinal fluid, WM, and GM (all p < 0.01). To correctly measure the DKI, the optimized b values for each voxel must be used. Voxel-based optimization DKI is a method that optimizes the b values for each voxel. It appears that voxel-based optimization DKI improves the accuracy of the K value for biological tissues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Castillo M, Smith JK, Kwock L, Wilber K. Apparent diffusion coefficients in the evaluation of high-grade cerebral gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22(1):60–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kono K, Inoue Y, Nakayama K, Shakudo M, Morino M, Ohata K, Wakasa K, Yamada R. The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with brain tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22(6):1081–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Charles-Edwards EM, deSouza NM. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and its application to cancer. Cancer Imaging. 2006;6:135–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Attariwala R, Picker W. Whole body MRI: improved lesion detection and characterization with diffusion weighted techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;38(2):253–68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Mulkern RV, Zengingonul HP, Robertson RL, Bogner P, Zou KH, Gudbjartsson H, Guttmann CR, Holtzman D, Kyriakos W, Jolesz FA, Maier SE. Multi-component apparent diffusion coefficients in human brain: relationship to spin-lattice relaxation. Magn Reson Med. 2000;44(2):292–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jensen JH, Helpern JA, Ramani A, Lu H, Kaczynski K. Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2005;53(6):1432–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jensen JH, Helpern JA. MRI quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by kurtosis analysis. NMR Biomed. 2010;23:698–710.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Fukunaga I, Hori M, Masutani Y, Hamasaki N, Sato S, Suzuki Y, Kumagai F, Kosuge M, Hoshito H, Kamagata K, Shimoji K, Nakanishi A, Aoki S, Senoo A. Effects of diffusional kurtosis imaging parameters on diffusion quantification. Radiol Phys Technol. 2013;6(2):343–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang C, Ren D, Guo Y, Xu Y, Feng Y, Zhang X, Mei Y, Chen M, Xiao X. Distribution of intravoxel incoherent motion MRI-related parameters in the brain: evidence of interhemispheric asymmetry. Clin Radiol. 2017;72(1):94.e1–.e6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lu H, Jensen JH, Ramani A, Helpern JA. Three-dimensional characterization of non-gaussian water diffusion in humans using diffusion kurtosis imaging. NMR Biomed. 2006;19(2):236–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ogura A, Koyama D, Hayashi N, Hatano I, Osakabe K, Yamaguchi N. Optimal b values for generation of computed high-b-value DW images. AJR. 2016;206:713–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ogura A, Hatano I, Osakabe K, Yamaguchi N, Koyama D, Watanabe H. Importance of fractional b value for calculating apparent diffusion coefficient in DWI. AJR. 2016;207(6):1239–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang AW, Jensen JH, Hu CC, Tabesh A, Falangola MF, Helpern JA. Effect of cerebral spinal fluid suppression for diffusional kurtosis imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;37(2):365–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology. 1988;168(2):497–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Takeshi Nitanai and Tetsuya Matsumoto for their help in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masanori Maehara.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Statement of human and animal rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review board and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies performed with animals.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maehara, M. Development of voxel-based optimization diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and comparison with conventional DKI. Radiol Phys Technol 12, 290–298 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-019-00523-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-019-00523-9

Keywords

Navigation