Skip to main content
Log in

Wide slab is useful for routine quality control of MRI slice thickness

  • Published:
Radiological Physics and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although slice thickness accuracy is important for the performance of magnetic resonance imaging systems, long scan times are required to perform reliable measurements. Inclined slabs and wedges are conventionally used as test devices to obtain slice profiles. In this study, a novel dedicated device with a widened slab was created, and its efficacy was compared with that of a conventional wedge. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the profile and the coefficient of variation (CV) of the measured slice thickness were measured. Wide slab usage showed sufficient SNR by averaging multiple profile lines, even with single acquisition. Therefore, it is possible to substantially shorten the measurement time. When ≥ 20 lines were averaged, CV was < 1%. Furthermore, a 200-mm slab width enabled evaluation of the positional dependence of slice thickness in a single imaging. Thus, quality control of MRI slice thickness can be easily implemented with this device.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peltonen JI, Mäkelä T, Sofiev A, Salli E. An automatic image processing workflow for daily magnetic resonance imaging quality assurance. J Digit Imaging. 2017;30(2):163–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Firbank MJ, Harrison RM, Williams ED, Coulthard A. Quality assurance for MRI: practical experience. Br J Radiol. 2000;73(868):376–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Committee on Quality Assurance in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2015 Magnetic resonance imaging quality control manual. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  4. International Standard 62464-1. Magnetic resonance equipment for medical imaging—part 1: determination of essential image quality parameters. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  5. National Electrical Manufacturers Association. NEMA standards publication MS 5-2010, determination of slice thickness in diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging. Washington, DC: National Electrical Manufacturers Association; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Price RR, Axel L, Morgan T, Newman R, Perman W, Schneiders N, Selikson M, Wood M, Thomas SR. Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance imaging: report of AAPM nuclear magnetic resonance task group no. 1. Med Phys. 1990;17(2):287–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lerski RA, de Certaines JD. Performance assessment and quality control in MRI by Eurospin test objects and protocols. Magn Reson Imaging. 1993;11(6):817–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoshida R, Machida Y, Ogura T, Tamura H, Hikichi T, Mori I. Slice profile measurement using a crossed thin-ramps method in three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2012;68(11):1456–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kanazawa T, Ohkubo M, Kondo T, Miyazawa T, Inagawa S. Improved wedge method for the measurement of sub-millimeter slice thicknesses in magnetic resonance imaging. Radiol Phys Technol. 2017;10(4):446–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakano T. Measurement of slice thickness using a resolution phantom in magnetic resonance imaging. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 1993;49(1):8–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Higashida M, Yamazaki M, Ogura A, Inoue H, Hongou T. Measurement of slice thickness using partial volume effect in MR imaging. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 1998;54(8):947–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamaguchi I, Ishimori Y, Fujiwara Y, Yachida T, Yoshioka C. Measurement of slice thickness in magnetic resonance image by the impulse response. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2012;68(10):1295–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ihalainen TM, Lönnroth NT, Peltonen JI, Uusi-Simola JK, Timonen MH, Kuusela LJ, Savolainen SE, Sipilä OE. MRI quality assurance using the ACR phantom in a multi-unit imaging center. Acta Oncol. 2011;50(6):966–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen CC, Wan YL, Wai YY, Liu HL. Quality assurance of clinical MRI scanners using ACR MRI phantom: preliminary results. J Digit Imaging. 2004;17(4):279–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Torfeh T, Hammoud R, Perkins G, McGarry M, Aouadi S, Celik A, Hwang KP, Stancanello J, Petric P, Al-Hammadi N. Characterization of 3D geometric distortion of magnetic resonance imaging scanners commissioned for radiation therapy planning. Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;34(5):645–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Torfeh T, Hammoud R, McGarry M, Al-Hammadi N, Perkins G. Development and validation of a novel large field of view phantom and a software module for the quality assurance of geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;33(7):939–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang D, Doddrell DM, Cowin G. A novel phantom and method for comprehensive 3-dimensional measurement and correction of geometric distortion in magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;22(4):529–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshiyuki Ishimori.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any human or animal study.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ishimori, Y., Monma, M. & Kawamura, H. Wide slab is useful for routine quality control of MRI slice thickness. Radiol Phys Technol 11, 345–352 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-018-0467-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-018-0467-0

Keywords

Navigation