Skip to main content
Log in

Physical image properties of a complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor imager for mammography systems

  • Published:
Radiological Physics and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We acquired a direct-type flat panel detector (FPD) developed for mammography systems and investigated its physical image properties, as its characteristics may affect future mammography in the clinic. The pixel size of the detector is 50 µm, the smallest size used in clinical mammography. Amorphous selenium (a-Se) film is used in direct-type FPDs. Due to its inferior temperature properties, the temperature of the imaging room should be set to approximately 25 °C. A novel a-Se film with superior heat resistance has been developed by the HAMAMATSU photonics KK Electron Tube Division that is suitable for high electric field driving. However, the associated trade-offs in image properties are unknown. The purposes of the current study were to investigate whether the detector maintains a high image quality in the presence of a high electric field, and to evaluate the image properties. The signal readout mechanism incorporates a complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor with superior noise properties. We measured the input–output characteristics, resolution, noise properties, and detection quantum efficiency, and investigated the effects of the exposure of the a-Se film to different applied voltages under standard mammography conditions prescribed by the International Electrotechnical Commission. The resolution and noise properties associated with the direct-type FPD were not affected by differences in applied voltage. The CMOS imager had a higher resolution than conventional systems with an equivalent pixel size. It also had a high detective quantum efficiency value. Thus, this detector may be useful in mammography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hori M, Matsuda T, Shibata A, Katanoda K, Sobue T, Nishimoto H, et al. Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 2009: a study of 32 population-based cancer registries for the Monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan (MCIJ) project. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2015;45(9):884–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Japan Radiological Society (JRS) and Japanese Society of Radiological Technology (JSRT). Mammography guidelines, 3rd edn, expanded version. 2014. p. 32.

  3. Ogusu K, Nakane O, Igasaki Y, Okamura Y, Yamada S, Hirai T. Advanced a-Se film with high sensitivity and heat resistance for X-ray detectors. Proc SPIE Med Imaging. 2009;9033.

  4. Hamamatsu Photonics KK. Hamamatsu photonics develops heat-resistant amorphous selenium film with high sensitivity for X-ray mammography; 2009. https://www.hamamatsu.com/resources/pdf/news/2009_02_05.pdf.

  5. Hamamatsu Photonics KK. Electron tube division documents OPTO-SEMICONDUCTOR HANDBOOK Chap. 09 X-ray detectors. https://www.hamamatsu.com/resources/pdf/ssd/e09_handbook_xray_detectors.pdf.

  6. Japan patent. JP 5185003 B2 2013.4.17 “Radiation detector”.

  7. Ohkawa Y, Miyakawa K, Matsubara T, Kikuchi K, Suzuki S, Kubota M, et al. Ultrahigh sensitivity 15-µm-thick HARP photoconductive film. J Inst Image Inf Television Eng. 2008;62(10):1641–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Oda Y, Ito T, Sato K, Morita J. Development of digital mammography system “AMULET Innovality” for examining breast cancer. Fujifilm Res Dev. 2014;59:7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nagaya S, Kuroda K. 3 Latest trend of breast cancer imaging diagnostic technology 1.Latest trend of digital mammography 3) Photon counting technology. Innervision. 2015;30(8):41–3.

    Google Scholar 

  10. IEC 62220-1-2. Medical electrical equipment—Characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices—Part 1–2: Determination of the detective quantum efficiency—Detectors used in mammography. International Electrotechnical Commission, 2007.

  11. Ichikawa K, Ishida T. Image quality measurement of digital radiography. Ohmsha: Japanese Society of Radiological Technology; 2013. Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rivetti S, Lanconelli N, Bertolini M, Borasi G, Golinelli P, Acchiappati D, Gallo E. Physical and psychophysical characterization of a novel clinical system for digital mammography. Med Phys. 2009;36:5139–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Monnin P, Gutierrez D, Bulling S, Guntern D, Verdun FR. A comparison of the performance of digital mammography systems. Med Phys. 2007;34:906 – 14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mr. Nakada and Mr. Suzuki of HAMAMATSU PHOTONICS KK, Electron Tube Division for their advice and guidance regarding the use of the CMOS detector. We would also like to thank the radiological technologists of Nagoya University Hospital for their cooperation. We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the Kodera Laboratory, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, for their cooperation. We would also like to thank the Imaging Group of the Japanese Society of Radiological Technology for providing the analysis format for the MTF and NPS values.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chizuru Okamoto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The CMOS digital X-ray imager used in this study was provided by HAMAMATSU PHOTONICS KK, Electron Tube Division. This article does not contain any studies that included human participants. No funding was received to support this study.

Research involving human participants and animals

This article does not contain any studies that included human participants or animals.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not needed in the study.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okamoto, C., Kodera, Y. Physical image properties of a complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor imager for mammography systems. Radiol Phys Technol 11, 284–293 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-018-0465-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-018-0465-2

Keywords

Navigation