Abstract
Three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF MRA) has been widely used in clinics. TOF MRA can cause dephasing artifacts, which lead to an intraluminal signal decrease. Silent MRA is a novel imaging technique that uses arterial spin labeling to achieve an ultrashort echo time (uTE), which is expected to decrease these effects and allow for accurate assessment of the flow in blood vessels. This study quantified the accuracy of Silent MRA images for visualizing the turbulent flow in flow-phantom and in vivo studies. The vessel contrast and coefficients of variation (CVs) for Silent MRA and TOF MRA were compared using normal and stenosis phantoms. Then, we performed both types of MRA on seven healthy volunteers. In the phantom study, although the contrast in the TOF MRA images was low distal to the stenosis region and at a high flow velocity, the contrast in the Silent MRA images did not change under these conditions. Furthermore, the mean CV for Silent MRA was smaller than that for TOF MRA under stenosis conditions. In the in vivo study, the mean contrast and vessel uniformity were significantly higher for Silent MRA than for TOF MRA. Although Silent MRA has limited spatial resolution and requires additional imaging time, this method may have the potential to improve the image quality of the carotid artery.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Heiserman JE, Drayer BP, Keller PJ, Fram EK. Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: evaluation with three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology. 1992;185(3):667–73.
Korogi Y, Takahashi M, Nakagawa T, Mabuchi N, Watabe T, Shiokawa Y, et al. Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: MR angiographic findings. Am J Neuroradiol. 1997;18(1):135–43.
Sadikin C, Teng M, Chen TY, Luo CB. The current role of 1.5 T non-contrast 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography to detect intracranial steno-occlusive disease. J Formos Med Assoc. 2007;106(9):691–9.
Hirai T, Korogi Y, Ono K, Nagano M, Maruoka K, Uemura S, et al. Prospective evaluation of suspected stenoocclusive disease of the intracranial artery: combined MR angiography and CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography. Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23(1):93–101.
Evans AJ, Richardson DB, Tien R, MacFall JR, Hedlund LW, Heinz ER, et al. Poststenotic signal loss in MR angiography: effects of echo time, flow compensation, and fractional echo. Am J Neuroradiol. 1993;14(3):721–9.
Anderson CM, Saloner D, Tsuruda JS, Shapeero LG, Lee RE. Artifacts in maximum-intensity-projection display of MR angiograms. Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154(3):623–9.
Oshinski JN, Ku DN, Pettigrew RI. Turbulent fluctuation velocity: the most significant determinant of signal loss in stenotic vessels. Magn Reson Med. 1995;33(2):193–9.
Schmalbrock P, Yuan C, Chakeres DW, Kohli J, Pelc NJ. Volume MR angiography: methods to achieve very short echo times. Radiology. 1990;175(3):861–5.
Dixon WT, Du LN, Faul DD, Gado M, Rossnick S. Projection angiograms of blood labeled by adiabatic fast passage. Magn Reson Med. 1986;3(3):454–62.
Nishimura DG, Macovski A, Pauly JM, Conolly SM. MR angiography by selective inversion recovery. Magn Reson Med. 1987;4(2):193–202.
Alibek S, Vogel M, Sun W, Winkler D, Baker CA, Burke M, et al. Acoustic noise reduction in MRI using Silent Scan: an initial experience. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2014;20(4):360–3.
Barger AV, Block WF, Toropov Y, Grist TM, Mistretta CA. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced imaging with isotropic resolution and broad coverage using an undersampled 3D projection trajectory. Magn Reson Med. 2002;48(2):297–305.
Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou XJ. Handbook of MRI pulse sequence. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic; 2004. p. 919.
Madio DP, Lowe IJ. Ultra-fast imaging using low flip angles and FIDs. Magn Reson Med. 1995;34(4):525–9.
Wu H, Wu H, Block WF, Block WF, Turski PA, Turski PA, et al. Noncontrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) intracranial MR angiography using pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling and accelerated 3D radial acquisition. Magn Reson Med. 2013;69:708–15.
Nielsen HT, Gold GE, Olcott EW, Pauly JM, Nishimura DG. Ultra-short echo-time 2D time-of-flight MR angiography using a half-pulse excitation. Magn Reson Med. 1999;41(3):591–9.
Irie R, Suzuki M, Yamamoto M, Takano N, Suga Y, Hori M, et al. Assessing blood flow in an intracranial stent: a feasibility study of MR angiography using a silent scan after stent-assisted coil embolization for anterior circulation aneurysms. Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(5):967–70.
Ota H, Takase K, Rikimaru H, Tsuboi M, Yamada T, Sato A, et al. Quantitative vascular measurements in arterial occlusive disease. Radiographics. 2005;25(5):1141–58.
Nederkoorn PJ, van der Graaf Y, Eikelboom BC, van der Lugt A, Bartels LW, Mali WPTM. Time-of-flight MR angiography of carotid artery stenosis: does a flow void represent severe stenosis? Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23(10):1779–84.
Koktzoglou I, Giri S, Piccini D, Grodzki DM, Flanagan O, Murphy IG, et al. Arterial spin labeled carotid MR angiography: a phantom study examining the impact of technical and hemodynamic factors. Magn Reson Med. 2016;75(1):295–301.
Lu H, Clingman C, Golay X, van Zijl PCM. Determining the longitudinal relaxation time (T1) of blood at 3.0 Tesla. Magn Reson Med. 2004;52(3):679–82.
Godzki DM, Jakob PM, Heismann B. Ultrashort echo time imaging using pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA). Magn Reson Med. 2012;67(2):510–8.
Prince MR. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology. 1994;191(1):155–64.
Jäger HR, Ellamushi H, Moore EA, Grieve JP, Kitchen ND, Taylor WJ. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of intracranial giant aneurysms. Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21(10):1900–7.
Nael K, Villablanca JP, Saleh R, Pope W, Nael A, Laub G, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3T in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: a comparison with time-of-flight MR angiography. Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27(10):2118–21.
Nederkoorn PJ, Elgersma OEH, van der Graaf Y, Eikelboom BC, Kappelle LJ, Mali WPTM. Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2003;228(3):677–82.
Gatenby JC, McCauley TR, Gore JC. Mechanisms of signal loss in magnetic resonance imaging of stenoses. Med Phys. 1993;20(4):1049–57.
Ståhlberg F, Ericsson A, Nordell B, Thomsen C, Henriksen O, Persson BR. MR imaging, flow and motion. Acta Radiol. 1992;33(3):179–200.
Hahn EL. Detection of sea-water motion by nuclear precession. J Geophys Res. 1960;65(2):776–7.
Drangova M, Pelc NJ. Artifacts and signal loss due to flow in the presence of B0 inhomogeneity. Magn Reson Med. 1996;35(1):126–30.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Yoshiyuki Ishimori, PhD for his useful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
About this article
Cite this article
Fujiwara, Y., Muranaka, Y. Improvement in visualization of carotid artery uniformity using silent magnetic resonance angiography. Radiol Phys Technol 10, 113–120 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-016-0375-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-016-0375-0