Skip to main content
Log in

A revision of proton machine quality assurance for wobbled-proton-beam therapy

  • Published:
Radiological Physics and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Periodic checks for proton machine quality assurance (QA) are significant for machine users safely and accurately to provide proton-beam treatment for cancer. Our aim in this study was to describe a revision to proton machine QA procedures for wobbled-proton-beam therapy at the Shizuoka Cancer Center (SCC) in Japan. The previous daily, monthly, and annual QA procedures were determined by reference to our past operational experience and to QA papers for medical accelerators. The revised QA procedures were initiated in May 2011 after preliminary measurements to decide baselines for the QA procedures. This paper presents the proton machine QA procedures and the results of representative QA measurements. Three action levels were decided on by reference to the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 142 report. Tolerances of inspection action were decided on based on the provisional operational results and actual fluctuations of the QA measurement for a year, and those of scheduled action and stop-treatment action were determined by reference to the machine QA papers and those of the inspection action. No deviation from the tolerance of the scheduled action has been observed so far. Although a few QA procedures exceeded the tolerance of the inspection action, these excesses were resolved by inspection and improvement of the respective measuring procedure within the designated QA time. Hereafter, the proton machine QA procedures proposed in this study will be performed continuously at the SCC to assure patient safety and accurate operation of proton therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilson RR. Radiological use of fast protons. Radiology. 1946;47:487–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. ICRU. Prescribing, recording, and reporting proton-beam therapy. ICRU Report 78, Oxford University Press; 2007.

  3. Arjomandy B, Sahoo N, Zhu XR, Zullo JR, Wu RY, Zhu M, Ding X, Martin C, Ciangaru G, Gillin MT. An overview of the comprehensive proton therapy machine quality assurance procedures implemented at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Proton Therapy Center-Houston. Med Phys. 2009;36:2269–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Klein EE, Hanley J, Bayouth J, Yin F, Simon W, Dresser S, Serago C, Aguirre F, Ma L, Arjomandy B, Liu C, Sandin C, Holmes T. Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators. Med Phys. 2009;36:4197–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kanai T, et al. Guidelines of physical and technological quality assurance for particle beam therapy. Japanese Society of Medical Physics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences; 2005.

  6. Murayama S, Fuji H, Yamashita H, Futami Y, Numano M, Harada H, Kamata M, Nishimura T. Initial clinical experience of proton therapy at Shizuoka Cancer Center. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 2005;65:424–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Akagi T, Higashi A, Tsugami H, Sakamoto H, Masuda Y, Hishikawa Y. Ridge filter design for proton therapy at Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center. Phys Med Biol. 2003;48:N301–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kanematsu N, Akagi T, Futami Y, Higashi A, Kanai T, Matsufuji N, Tomura H, Yamashita H. A proton dose calculation code for treatment planning based on the pencil beam algorithm. Jpn J Med Phys. 1998;18:88–103.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Russell KR, Isacsson U, Saxner M, Ahnesjoe A, Montelius A, Grusell E, Dahlgren C-V, Lorin S, Glimelius B. Implementation of pencil kernel and depth penetration algorithms for treatment planning of proton beams. Phys Med Biol. 2000;45:9–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kanematsu N, Matsufuji N, Kohno R, Minohara S, Kanai T. A CT calibration method based on the polybinary tissue model for radiotherapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol. 2003;48:1053–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Minohara S, Kanai T, Endo M, Noda K, Kanazawa M. Respiratory gated irradiation system for heavy-ion radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000;47:1097–103.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kutcher GJ, Coia L, Gillin M, Hanson WF, Leibel S, Morton RJ, Palta JR, Purdy JA, Reinstein LE, Svensson GK, Weller M, Wingfield L. Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40. Med Phys. 1994;21:581–618.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. IAEA. Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: an international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water. International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Report Series No. 398, Vienna; 2000.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Drs. Shuichi Ozawa and Chie Toramatsu are gratefully acknowledged for fruitful discussions about machine QA procedures. This work was partially supported by the Association for Nuclear Technology in Medicine. We thank all members of the Proton Therapy Division at the Shizuoka Cancer Center and on-site staff members of the Mitsubishi Electric Corporation for their skillful support.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuki Kase.

About this article

Cite this article

Kase, Y., Yamashita, H., Numano, M. et al. A revision of proton machine quality assurance for wobbled-proton-beam therapy. Radiol Phys Technol 6, 444–452 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-013-0217-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-013-0217-2

Keywords

Navigation