Skip to main content
Log in

Accuracy validation of incident photon fluence on DQE for various measurement conditions and X-ray units

  • Published:
Radiological Physics and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Detective quantum efficiency (DQE) is widely used as a comprehensive metric for X-ray image evaluation in digital X-ray units. The incident photon fluence per air kerma (\( {\text{SNR}}_{\text{in}}^{2} \)) is necessary for calculating the DQE. The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) reports the \( {\text{SNR}}_{\text{in}}^{2} \) under conditions of standard radiation quality, but this \( {\text{SNR}}_{\text{in}}^{2} \) might not be accurate as calculated from the X-ray spectra emitted by an actual X-ray tube. In this study, we evaluated the error range of the \( {\text{SNR}}_{\text{in}}^{2} \) presented by the IEC62220-1 report. We measured the X-ray spectra emitted by an X-ray tube under conditions of standard radiation quality of RQA5. The spectral photon fluence at each energy bin was multiplied by the photon energy and the mass energy absorption coefficient of air; then the air kerma spectrum was derived. The air kerma spectrum was integrated over the whole photon energy range to yield the total air kerma. The total photon number was then divided by the total air kerma. This value is the \( {\text{SNR}}_{\text{in}}^{2} \). These calculations were performed for various measurement parameters and X-ray units. The percent difference between the calculated value and the standard value of RQA5 was up to 2.9 %. The error range was not negligibly small. Therefore, it is better to use the new \( {\text{SNR}}_{\text{in}}^{2} \) of 30694 (1/(mm2 μGy)) than the current \( {\text{SNR}}_{\text{in}}^{2} \) of 30174 (1/(mm2 μGy)).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dainty JC, Shaw R. Image Science. London: Academic Press; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  2. IEC 62220-1 Medical electrical equipment—Characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices. 2008.

  3. H. Kramer. SPEVAL software package version; Jan 1995.

  4. Di Castro E, Pellegrini R, Bacci C. The use of cadmium telluride detectors for the qualitative analysis of diagnostic X-ray spectra. Phys Med Biol. 1984;29:1117–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Matsumoto C, Takahashi T, Takizawa K, Ohno R, Ozaki T, Mori K. Performance of a new schottky CdTe detector for hard X-ray spectroscopy. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1998;45:428–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Takahashi T, Mitani T, Kobayashi Y, Kouda M, Sato G, Watanabe S, Nakazawa K, Okada Y, Funaki M, Ohno R, Mori K. High-resolution schottky CdTe diode detector. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2002;49:1297–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Miyajima S. Thin CdTe detector in diagnostic x-ray spectroscopy. Med Phys. 2003;30:771–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. J. H. Hubbell, S. M. Seltzer. Tables of X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients and Mass Energy-Absorption Coefficients from 1 keV to 20 MeV for Elements Z = 1 to 92 and 48 Additional Substances of Dosimetric Interest. Physical Reference Data (NISTIR 5632). NIST: USA; 1996.

  9. Tucker Douglas M. Semiempirical model for generating tungsten target x-ray spectra. Med Phys. 1991;18:211–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. IEC 61267 Medical diagnostic X-ray equipment—Radiation conditions for use in the determination of characteristics. 2005.

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomonobu Haba.

About this article

Cite this article

Haba, T., Kondo, S., Hayashi, D. et al. Accuracy validation of incident photon fluence on DQE for various measurement conditions and X-ray units. Radiol Phys Technol 6, 423–430 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-013-0215-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-013-0215-4

Keywords

Navigation