Advertisement

A Capability Approach to Child Growth

  • Sepideh Yousefzadeh
  • Mario Biggeri
  • Caterina Arciprete
  • Hinke Haisma
Article
  • 126 Downloads

Abstract

For decades, child growth monitoring has been performed by measuring anthropometric indicators and comparing them against universal standards. Since the 1970s various efforts have been made to expand the focus from anthropometric indicators and include broader contextual and structural factors that influence children’s growth. However, those efforts have so far not led to changes in the dimensions that are taken into account in child growth monitoring. In this paper we introduce the Capability Approach asan evaluative framework for growth monitoring of children under five years old. Applying the CA helps focusing on what children are able to achieve by analyzing their available resources (endowments), as well as the mechanisms that could enhance or restrict their access to those resources (conversion factors). In addition, children’s growth could be assessed alongside the caregivers’ capabilities that children rely on to achieve their full growth potential. We present a child growth evaluation framework as well as a matrix, which has different categories of dimensions that interact with each other and ultimately shape children’s growth. The framework is a flexible tool, and is thus broad enough to accommodate contextual differences.

Keywords

Child growth Growth monitoring charts Capability approach Multidimensional measurement 

Notes

Funding

This work is financed by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) in relation to the research programme “Normative indicators of child growth and nutrition – once size fits all”, the grant (NWO/WOTRO W01.70.300.002) was awarded to Hinke Haisma in 2012.

References

  1. Aarnoudse-Moens, C. S., Weisglas-Kuperus, N., van Goudoever, J. B., & Oosterlaan, J. (2009). Meta-analysis of neurobehavioral outcomes in very preterm and/or very low birth weight children. Pediatrics, 124(2), 717–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Addabbo, T., & Di Tommaso, M. L. (2009). Children's capabilities and family characteristics in Italy. IARIW Conference in Slovenia.Google Scholar
  3. Anand, P., & Roope, L. (2013). Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  4. Andresen, S., & Fegter, S. (2011). Children growing up in poverty and their ideas on what constitutes a good life: Childhood studies in Germany. Child Indicators Research, 4(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anghelescu, C., Boca, C., Herseni, I., Popescu, C., Stativa, E., Ulrich, C., & Novak, C. (2010). Early childhood and development standards: For children from birth to seven years old. UNICEF. Available here: http://unicef.ro/wp-content/uploads/Studiu_ELDS.pdf.
  6. Armstrong, R., Doyle, J., Lamb, C., & Waters, E. (2006). Multi-sectoral health promotion and public health: The role of evidence. Journal of Public Health (Oxford, England), 28(2), 168–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ashworth, A., Shrimpton, R., & Jamil, K. (2008). Growth monitoring and promotion: Review of evidence of impact. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 4(s1), 86–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ballet, J., Biggeri, M., & Comim, F. (2011). Children’s agency and the capability approach: A conceptual framework. In Children and the capability approach (pp. 22–45). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barcelos, C. A., & Gubrium, A. C. (2014). Reproducing stories: strategic narratives of teen pregnancy and motherhood. Social Problems, 61(3), 466–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barnett, W. S. (1995). Long-term effects of early childhood programs on cognitive and school outcomes. The Future of Children, 25–50.Google Scholar
  11. Basu, K., & Foster, J. E. (1998). On measuring literacy. The Economic Journal, 108(451), 1733–1749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bell, R., Donkin, A., & Marmot, M. (2013). Tackling structural and social issues to reduce inequalities in children's outcomes in low to middle-income countries.Google Scholar
  13. Bellanca, N., Biggeri, M., & Marchetta, F. (2011). An extension of the capability approach: Towards a theory of dis-capability. ALTER-European Journal of Disability Research/Revue Européenne De Recherche Sur Le Handicap, 5(3), 158–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ben-Joseph, E. P., Dowshen, S. A., & Izenberg, N. (2009). Do parents understand growth charts? A national, internet-based survey. Pediatrics, 124(4), 1100–1109.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-0797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Biggeri, M., & Anich, R. (2009). The deprivation of street children in Kampala: Can the capability approach and participatory methods unlock a new perspective in research and decision making? Mondes En Développement, 146(2), 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Biggeri, M., & Karkara, R. (2014). Transforming Children's rights into real freedom: A dialogue between Children’s rights and the capability approach from a life cycle perspective. In D. Stoecklin & J.-M. Bonvin (Eds.), Children’s Rights and the Capability Approach: Challenges and Prospects. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Biggeri, M., & Santi, M. (2012). The missing dimensions of children's well-being and well-becoming in education systems: Capabilities and philosophy for children. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 13(3), 373–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Biggeri, M., Libanora, R., Mariani, S., & Menchini, L. (2006). Children conceptualizing their capabilities: Results of a survey conducted during the first Children’s world congress on child labour’. Journal of Human Development, 7(1), 59–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Biggeri, M., Ballet, J., & Comim, F. (Eds.). (2011). Children and the Capability Approach. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Black, R. E., Victora, C. G., Walker, S. P., Bhutta, Z. A., Christian, P., De Onis, M., et al. (2013). Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet, 382(9890), 427–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychological Review, 101(4), 568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 993–1028). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
  23. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A (2007). The bioecological model of human development. Handbook of child psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0114.
  24. Campbell, F. A., & Ramey, C. T. (1994). Effects of early intervention on intellectual and academic achievement: A follow-up study of children from low-income families. Child Development, 65(2), 684–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Casanovas, M. C., Lutter, C. K., Mangasaryan, N., Mwadime, R., Hajeebhoy, N., Aguilar, A. M., & Andia, D. (2013). Multi-sectoral interventions for healthy growth. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 9(S2), 46–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chiappero-Martinetti, E., & Venkatapuram, S. (2014). The capability approach: a framework for population studies. Etude de la Population Africaine, 28(2), 708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Clark, Z., & Eisenhuth, F. (2010). The capability approach and research on children. Children and the Good Life: New Challenges for the Research on Children, 69–73.Google Scholar
  28. Clery, E., Tsang, T., & Vizard, P. (2014). The children’s measurement framework: A new indicator-based tool for monitoring children’s equality and human rights. Child Indicators Research, 7(2), 321–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Currie, C., Molcho, M., Boyce, W., Holstein, B., Torsheim, T., & Richter, M. (2008). Researching health inequalities in adolescents: The development of the health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) family affluence scale. Social Science & Medicine, 66(6), 1429–1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. de Onis, M., & Blössner, M. (2003). The world health organization global database on child growth and malnutrition: Methodology and application. International Journal of Epidemiology, 32(4), 518–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. de Onis, M., Garza, C., Victora, C. G., Onyango, A. W., Frongillo, E. A., & Martines, J. (2004). The WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study: planning, study design, and methodology. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 25(1_suppl1), S15–S26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. de Onis, M., W Onyango, A., Borghi, E., Garza, C., & Yang, H. (2006). Comparison of the world health organization (WHO) child groth statistics/WHO international growth reference: Implications for child health programmes. Public Health Nutrition, 9(7), 942.Google Scholar
  33. de Onis, M., Garza, C., Onyango, A. W., & Borghi, E. (2007). Comparison of the WHO child growth standards and the CDC 2000 growth charts. The Journal of Nutrition, 137(1), 144–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Di Tommaso, M. L. (2006). Measuring the well being of children using a capability approach - an application to indian data. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  35. Di Tommaso, M. L. (2007). Children capabilities: A structural equation model for India. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(3), 436–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Dixon, R., & Nussbaum, M. (2012). Children's rights and a capability approach: The question of special priority. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  37. Domínguez-Serrano, M., & del Moral Espín, L. (2018). From relevant capabilities to relevant indicators: defining an indicator system for children’s well-being in Spain. Child Indicators Research, 11(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Dubois, L., & Girard, M. (2006). Early determinants of overweight at 4.5 years in a population-based longitudinal study. International Journal of Obesity, 30(4), 610–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Engle, P. L., Black, M. M., Behrman, J. R., De Mello, M. C., Gertler, P. J., Kapiriri, L., & International Child Development Steering Group. (2007). Strategies to avoid the loss of developmental potential in more than 200 million children in the developing world. The Lancet, 369(9557), 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fegter, S., & Richter, M. (2014). Capability approach as a framework for research on children’s well-being. In B. Arieh, F. Casas, I. Frønes, & J. Korbin (Eds.), Handbook of child well-being (pp. 739–758). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fox, N. A., & Calkins, S. D. (2003). The development of self-control of emotion: Intrinsic and extrinsic influences. Motivation and Emotion, 27(1), 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Foster, J., & Handy, C. (2008). External capabilities(No. ophiwp008). Queen Elizabeth House: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  43. Gerein, N. M., & Ross, D. A. (1991). Is growth monitoring worthwhile? An evaluation of its use in three child health programs in Zaire. Social Science & Medicine, 32(6), 667–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Geronimus, A. T. (1996). Black/white differences in the relationship of maternal age to birthweight: a population-based test of the weathering hypothesis. Social Science and Medicine, 42(4), 589–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Haisma, H., Yousefzadeh, S., & Boele Van Hensbroek, P. (2017). Towards a capability approach to child growth: a theoretical framework. Maternal & Child Nutrition.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12534.
  46. Helleiner, G. K., Cornia, G. A., & Jolly, R. (1991). IMF adjustment policies and approaches and the needs of children. World Development, 19(12), 1823–1834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hoff, E. (2003). The specificity of environmental influence: Socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech. Child Development, 74(5), 1368–1378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Irwin, L. G., Siddiqi, A., & Hertzman, C. (2007). Early child development: A powerful equalizer. Jolly, R. (1991). Adjustment with a human face: A UNICEF record and perspective on the 1980s. World Development, 19(12), 1807–1821.Google Scholar
  49. Jonsson, U. (2003). Human rights approach to development programming United Nations Publications.Google Scholar
  50. Loeb, S., Bridges, M., Bassok, D., Fuller, B., & Rumberger, R. W. (2007). How much is too much? The influence of preschool centers on children's social and cognitive development. Economics of Education Review, 26(1), 52–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mangasaryan, N., Arabi, M., & Schultink, W. (2011). Revisiting the concept of growth monitoring and its possible role in community-based nutrition programs. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 32(1), 42–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Marmot, M., Friel, S., Bell, R., Houweling, T. A., Taylor, S., & Commission on Social Determinants of Health. (2008). Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. The Lancet, 372(9650), 1661–1669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Martorell, R. (1999). The nature of child malnutrition and its long-term implications. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 20(3), 288–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Martorell, R., & Zongrone, A. (2012). Intergenerational influences on child growth and undernutrition. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 26(s1), 302–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McDermott, E., & Graham, H. (2005). Resilient young mothering: social inequalities, late modernity and the 'problem' of 'teenage' motherhood. Journal of Youth Studies, 8(1), 59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McDonald, C. M., Manji, K. P., Kupka, R., Bellinger, D. C., Spiegelman, D., Kisenge, R., … Duggan, C. P. (2013). Stunting and wasting are associated with poorer psychomotor and mental development in HIV-exposed Tanzanian infants. The Journal of Nutrition, 143(2), 204–214.  https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.112.168682.
  57. Nussbaum, M. (2006). Education and democratic citizenship: Capabilities and quality education. Journal of Human Development, 7(3), 385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Olson, R. K. (2002). Dyslexia: Nature and nurture. Dyslexia, 8(3), 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pan, B. A., Rowe, M. L., Singer, J. D., & Snow, C. E. (2005). Maternal correlates of growth in toddler vocabulary production in low-income families. Child Development, 76(4), 763–782.Google Scholar
  60. Peisner-Feinberg, E. S., Burchinal, M. R., Clifford, R. M., Culkin, M. L., Howes, C., Kagan, S. L., & Yazejian, N. (2001). The relation of preschool child-care quality to children's cognitive and social developmental trajectories through second grade. Child Development, 72(5), 1534–1553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Phillips, D. A., & Shonkoff, J. P. (Eds.). (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  62. Phillips, A. (2004). Defending equality of outcome. Journal of Political Philosophy, 12(1), 1–19 ISSN 1467-9760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Piwoz, E., Sundberg, S., & Rooke, J. (2012). Promoting healthy growth: What are the priorities for research and action? Advances in Nutrition: An International Review Journal, 3(2), 234–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ramchandani, P., Stein, A., Evans, J., O'Connor, T. G., & Study Team, A. L. S. P. A. C. (2005). Paternal depression in the postnatal period and child development: A prospective population study. The Lancet, 365(9478), 2201–2205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Roberfroid, D., Pelto, G. H., & Kolsteren, P. (2007). Plot and see! Maternal comprehension of growth charts worldwide. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 12(9), 1074–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Robeyns, I. (2003). Sen’s capability approach and gender inequality: selecting relevant capabilities. Feminist Economics, 9(2-3), 61–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Robeyns, I. (2006). The capability approach in practice. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(3), 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Robeyns, I. (2007). Will a basic income do justice to women? In R. FÜCKS (Ed.), Die zukunft sozialer sicherheit [The future of social security] (Heinrich Böll Foundation Trans.). (pp. 102).Google Scholar
  69. Robeyns, I. (2011). Sen's capability approach and gender inequality: Selecting relevant capabilities. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), 61–92.Google Scholar
  70. Roelen, K., Gassmann, F., & De Neubourg, C. (2009). The importance of choice and definition for the measurement of child poverty—The case of Vietnam. Child Indicators Research, 2(3), 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ruel, M. T., Levin, C. E., Armar-Klemesu, M., Maxwell, D., & Morris, S. S. (1999). Good care practices can mitigate the negative effects of poverty and low maternal schooling on children’s nutritional status: Evidence from accra. World Development, 27(11), 1993–2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Saigal, S., Hoult, L. A., Streiner, D. L., Stoskopf, B. L., & Rosenbaum, P. L. (2000). School difficulties at adolescence in a regional cohort of children who were extremely low birth weight. Pediatrics, 105(2), 325–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Saigal, S., Stoskopf, B., Streiner, D., Boyle, M., Pinelli, J., Paneth, N., & Goddeeris, J. (2006). Transition of extremely low-birth-weight infants from adolescence to young adulthood: Comparison with normal birth-weight controls. JAMA, 295(6), 667–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sassi, M. (2013, June). Child nutritional status in the Malawian District of Salima: a capability approach. In 2013 Second Congress, June 6–7, 2013, Parma, Italy (No. 149892). Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).Google Scholar
  75. Sen, A. (1992a). Inequaliy re-examined’, Harvard University press Sen, A. (2007). Children and human rights. Indian Journal of Human Development, 1(2).Google Scholar
  76. Sen, A. (1992b). Inequaliy re-examined. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Sen, A. (2003). Development as capability expansion. In S. Fukuda-Parr et al (Eds.), Readings in Human Development. New Delhi and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Sen, A. (2006). Identity and violence: The illusion of destiny. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  79. Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Sen, A. K. (2005). Human Rights and Capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6(2), 151–166.Google Scholar
  81. Shonkoff, J. P., & Phillips, D. A. (2000). Rethinking nature and nurture.Google Scholar
  82. Smith, C. L., & Haddad, L. (1999). Explaining child malnutrition in developing countries: A cross-country analysis. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  83. Smith, C. L., Ramakrishnan, U., Ndiaye, A., Haddad, L., & Martorell, R. (2003). The importance of women's status for child nutrition in developing countries. Washington: International Food Policy Research Institute - Department of International Health, Emory University.Google Scholar
  84. Stewart, F. (1991). The many faces of adjustment. World Development, 19(12), 1847–1864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Stewart, C. P., Iannotti, L., Dewey, K. G., Michaelsen, K. F., & Onyango, A. W. (2013). Contextualizing complementary feeding in a broader framework for stunting prevention. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 9(S2), 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Swaminathan, M. (1990). The first three years: A sourcebook on early childhood care and education. (No. ED-90/WC-28). Paris: UNESCO-UNICEF.Google Scholar
  87. Terzi, L. (2005). Beyond the Dilemma of Difference: The Capability Approach to Disability and Special Educational Needs. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39(3), 443–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Trani, J., Bakhshi, P., Bellanca, N., Biggeri, M., & Marchetta, F. (2011). Disabilities through the capability approach lens: Implications for public policies. ALTER-European Journal of Disability Research/Revue Européenne De Recherche Sur Le Handicap, 5(3), 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. UNESCO. (2014). Holistic early childhood development index (HECDI) framework - A technical guide. Available here: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002291/229188e.pdf.
  90. UNICEF. (1990). Strategy for improved nutrition of children and women in developing countries. New York: UNICEF.Google Scholar
  91. UNICEF. (2008). Early childhood development - the key to a full and productive life. New York: UNICEF.Google Scholar
  92. UNICEF. (2013). Early childhood development in emergencies. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.org/earlychildhood/index_40745.html.
  93. Venkatapuram, S. (2010). Global justice and the social determinants of health. Ethics & international affairs, 24(2), 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Victora, C. G., Adair, L., Fall, C., Hallal, P. C., Martorell, R., Richter, L., et al. (2008). Maternal and child undernutrition: Consequences for adult health and human capital. The Lancet, 371(9609), 340–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Victora, C. G., Aquino, E. M., do Carmo Leal, M., Monteiro, C. A., Barros, F. C., & Szwarcwald, C. L. (2011). Maternal and child health in Brazil: Progress and challenges. The Lancet, 377(9780), 1863–1876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. WHO. (2007). WHO child growth standards head circumference-for-age, arm circumference-for-age, triceps skinfold-for-age and subscapular skinfold-for-age methods and development. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
  97. WHO. (2008). Integrated health services - what and why? Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  98. Young, M. E. (1995). Investing in young children. World Bank Discussion Papers No. 275. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  99. Young, M. E. (Ed.). (2002). From early child development to human development: Investing in our children's future. Proceedings of a World Bank Conference on Investing in Our Children’s Future Washington, D.C., April 10–11, 2000, Washington, World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
  100. Yousefzadeh, S., & Gassmann, F. (2016). Local needs and global indicators: A contextual approach to multidimensional child poverty - case study: Iran 1984-2009. Ethical Perspective (Special Issue Justice and Disadvantages during Childhood), 23(1), 165–182.Google Scholar
  101. Zorlu, G. (2011). New WHO child growth standards catch on. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 89, 250–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Population Research CentreUniversity of GroningenGroningenthe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Economics and ManagementUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  3. 3.ARCO - Action Research for Co-DevelopmentUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations