Child Indicators Research

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 479–499 | Cite as

A Qualitative Longitudinal Study on the Well-Being of Children and Adolescents

  • Mònica González-CarrascoEmail author
  • Cristina Vaqué
  • Sara Malo
  • Gemma Crous
  • Ferran Casas
  • Cristina Figuer


The aim of this article is to identify factors influencing well-being (whether positively or negatively) reported by children and adolescents from their own perspective, in the context of focus groups and individual interviews, and variations in their answers at two different points in time (one year apart), according to: 1) their previous scores (higher or lower) measured using psychometric scales of subjective well-being (SWB) and related constructs (temperamental traits, specifically via variables related to perceptual and pleasure sensitivity and life optimism), and 2) their age (measured through school year and classified into five cohorts). Important commonalites were observed in the answers reported by participants regardless of their prior levels of SWB and related constructs, the cohort they belonged to, the two separate data collections and the data collection technique used. This finding is interpreted as being due to the existence of a shared and fairly stable bottom-up effect in children and adolescents’ well-being. However, interesting discrepances are also observed between the groups of participants, which contributes to converging theoretical explanations arising out of two different traditions in the study of well-being (the hedonic and the eudaimonic), while also furthering scientific knowledge on how to better research children and adolescents’ well-being from a qualitative point of view.


Focus groups Individual interviews Subjective well-being Psychological well-being Qualitative analysis Children and adolescents 



This project was funded by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) as part of the National Research Project Programme, within the 6th National Plan for Scientific Research, Development and Technological Innovation 2008–2011, with reference PSI2010-19404. Thanks are due to Barney Griffins for editing of the English text.


  1. Antaramian, S. P., Huebner, E. S., & Valois, R. F. (2008). Adolescent life satisfaction. Applied Psychology. An International Review, 57, 112–126. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baltatescu, S. (2006). Comparative results and psychometric properties of the personal well-being index- Romania (old and new versions) with an adolescent sample- a preliminary analysis. Retrieved from website.
  3. Bardin, L. (2002). Análisis de contenido. Madrid: Ediciones Akal.Google Scholar
  4. Blasco, T., & Otero, L. (2008). Técnicas conversacionales para la recogida de datos en investigación cualitativa: La entrevista (II). Nure Investigación, 34, may-june.Google Scholar
  5. Camfield, L., Crivello, G., & Woodhead, M. (2009). Wellbeing research in developing countries: Reviewing the role of qualitative methods. Social Indicators Research, 90(1), 5–31. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Casas, F. (1996). Bienestar social. Una introducción psicosocial. [Social well-being. A psychosocial introduction]. Barcelona: PPU.Google Scholar
  7. Casas, F., Sarriera, J. C., Abs, D., Coenders, G., Alfaro, J., Saforcada, E., & Tonon, G. (2012). Subjective indicators of personal well-being among adolescents. Performance and results for different scales in Latin- language speaking countries: A contribution to the international debate. Child Indicators Research, 5(1), 1–28. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coombes, L., Appleton, J., Allen, D., & Yerrell, P. (2013). Emotional health and well-being in schools: Involving young people. Children & Society, 27, 220–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coyl-Shepherd, D. D., & Newland, L. A. (2013). Mothers’ and fathers’ couple and family contextual influences, parent involvement, and school-age child attachment. Early Child Development and Care, 183(3–4), 553–569. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., van Pallant, J., Vugt, J., & Misajon, R. (2003). Developing a national index of subjective well-being: The Australian unity well-being index. Social Indicators Research, 64, 159–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Currie, C., Zanotti, C., Morgan, A., Currie, D., de Looze, M., Roberts, C., & Rasmussen, V. B. (2012). Social determinants of health and well-being among young people. Health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) study: International report from the 2009/2010 survey. In W. R. O. F. Europe (Ed.), Health policy for children and adolescents (Vol. 6). Copenhagen: Who Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
  12. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology, 49, 14–23. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diener, E. (1994). El bienestar subjetivo. [Subjective well-being]. Intervención Psicosocial, 3(8), 67–113.Google Scholar
  14. Diener, E., Scollon, K. N., Oishi, S., Dzokoto, V., & Suh, E. M. (2000). Positivity and the construction of life satisfaction judgements: Global happiness is not the sum of its parts. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ellis, L. K., & Rothbart, M. K. (2001). Revision of the early adolescent temperament questionnaire. Poster presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in child development. MN: Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  16. Escobar, J., & Bonilla-Jimenez, F. (2009). Grupos Focales: una guía conceptual metodológica. Cuadernos Hispanoamericanos de Psicología, 9(1), 51–67.Google Scholar
  17. Evans, D., & Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Developing a model for adult temperament. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 868–888.
  18. Fattore, T., Mason, J., & Watson, E. (2007). Children’s conceptualisation(s) of their well-being. Social Indicators Research, 80, 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilman, R., & Huebner, E. S. (2006). Characteristics of adolescents who report very high life satisfaction. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(3), 311–319. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goldbeck, L., Schmitz, T. G., Nesier, T., Herschbach, P., & Henrich, G. (2007). Life satisfaction decreases during adolescence. Quality of Life Research, 16, 969–979. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. González-Carrasco, M., Casas, F., Malo, S., Viñas, F., & Dinisman, T. (2017). Changes with age in subjective well-being through the adolescent years: Differences by gender. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18, 63–88. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goswami, H. (2014). Children’s subjective well-being: Socio-demographic characteristics and personality. Child Indicators Research, 7, 119–140. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hallam, W. T., Olsson, C. A., O’Connor, M., J Happiness Stud, et al. (2014). Association between adolescent Eudaimonic Behaviours and emotional competence in young adulthood. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(5), 1165–1117. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huebner, E. S., Seligson, J. L., Valois, R. F., & Suldo, S. M. (2006). A review of the brief multidimensional students’ life satisfaction scale. Social Indicators Research, 79, 477–484. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaplowitz, M. D., & Hoehn, J. P. (2001). Do focus groups and individual interviews reveal the same information for nature resource validation? Ecological Economics, 36, 237–247.Google Scholar
  26. Leung, C. Y., McBride-Chang, C., & Lai, B. P. (2004). Relations among maternal parenting style, academic competence, and life satisfaction in Chinese early adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 24, 113–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu, W., Mei, J., Tian, L. & Huebner, E. S. (2015). Age and gender differences in the relation between school-related social support and subjective well-being in school among students. Social Indicators Research.
  28. Malo, S., Navarro, D., & Casas, F. (2012). El uso de los medios audiovisuales en la adolescencia y su relación con el bienestar subjetivo: análisis cualitativo desde la perspectiva intergeneracional y de género. Athenea Digital, 12(3), 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Navarro, D. (2011). La participació social dels adolescents en el context escolar: Estudi psicosocial d’una experiència participativa. Doctoral thesis: University of Girona, Girona.Google Scholar
  30. Navarro, D., Montserrat, C., Malo, S., González, M., Casas, F., & Crous, G. (2017). Subjective well-being: What do adolescents say? Child & Family Social Work, 22(1), 175–184. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Neuendorf, K. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Newman, D. B., Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2014). Leisure and subjective well-being: A model of psychological mechanisms as mediating factors. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(3), 555–578. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nic Gabhainn, S., & Sixsmith, J. (2006). Children photographing well-being: Facilitating participation in research. Children & Society, 20(4), 249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oberle, E., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Zumbo, B. D. (2011). Life satisfaction in early adolescence: Personal, neighborhood, school, family, and peer influences. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 889–901. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rodríguez, I. (2006). Redefiniendo el trabajo metodológico cualitativo con niños: el uso de la entrevista de grupo aplicada al estudio de la tecnología. Empiria. Revista de Metodología en Ciencias Sociales, (12), 65–88.Google Scholar
  36. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A re-evaluation of the life orientation test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. September, R., & Savahl, S. (2009). Children’s perspectives of child well-being. The Social Work Practitioner-Researcher, 21(1), 23–40.Google Scholar
  39. Singh, K., Ruch, W., & Junnarkar, M. (2015). Effect of the demographic variables and psychometric properties of the personal well-being index for school children in India. Child Indicators Research, 8, 571–585. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Suldo, S. M., & Huebner, E. S. (2006). Is extremely high life satisfaction during adolescence advantageous? Social Indicators Research, 78, 179–203. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tomyn, A. J., & Cummins, R. A. (2011). The subjective wellbeing of Australian high-school students: Validating the personal well-being index-school children. Social Indicators Research, 101(3), 405–418. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Viñas, F., González, M., Malo, S., García, Y., & Casas, F. (2014). Temperament and personal wellbeing in a sample of 12 to 16 year-old adolescents. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 9(2), 355–366. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mònica González-Carrasco
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cristina Vaqué
    • 2
  • Sara Malo
    • 1
  • Gemma Crous
    • 1
  • Ferran Casas
    • 1
  • Cristina Figuer
    • 1
  1. 1.Quality of Life Research Institute, Faculty of Education and PsychologyUniversity of GironaGironaSpain
  2. 2.University of Vic-Central of CataloniaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations