How Do Children Contextualize Their Well-Being? Methodological Insights from a Neighborhood Based Qualitative Study in Istanbul

  • Başak Akkan
  • Serra Müderrisoglu
  • Pınar Uyan-Semerci
  • Emre Erdogan
Article
  • 54 Downloads

Abstract

Built on a neighborhood-based qualitative study that was carried out in Istanbul, this article explores the use of complementary research methods that explore how children contextualize their well-being within the spatial boundaries of a particular social location. Therefore, spatiality is used as a methodological tool to understand children’s subjective construction of well-being embedded in a web of relations. Using the framework of the social studies of childhood that constructs child as an agent, the research study puts emphasis in involving children in the research process as active participants and encouraging them to build their own narratives that manifest authentic childhood experiences. A variety of methods that are developed according to the age of the child are used in this study like in-depth interviews based on spatial experiences, in-depth interviews with a projection method, thematic focus groups and photography study. They are designed to facilitate a participatory research process that encourages the child to think through the spaces (school, home, neighborhood, etc.) along with a web of relations that his/her well-being is embedded in. The spatial understanding of child well-being in relation to subjective and objective conditions is the focus of the analysis of the qualitative research.

Keywords

Child well-being Spatiality Qualitative study Agency Participatory research Neighbourhood 

References

  1. Axford, N. (2008). Exploring concepts of child well-being: Implication for children’s services. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barker, J., & Weller, S. (2003). Never work with children? The geography of methodological issues in research with children. Qualitative Research, 3(2), 207–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ben-Arieh, A. (2008). The child indicators movement: Past, present, and future. Child Indicators Research, 1(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ben-Arieh, A. (2009). Social indicators of children’s well-being past present and future. In A. Ben-Arieh & I. Frønes (Eds.), Indicators of children’s well-being: Theory and practices in multi-cultural perspective (pp. 1–15). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ben-Arieh, A. (2010a). Developing indicators for child well-being in a changing context. In C. McAuley & W. Rose (Eds.), Child well-being: Understanding children’s lives (pp. 129–142). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Ben-Arieh, A. (2010b). From child welfare to children well-being: The child indicator perspective. In A. Ben-Arieh, S. Phipps, & S. B. Kamerman (Eds.), From child welfare to child well-being: An international perspective on knowledge in the service of policy making (pp. 9–24). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ben-Arieh, A. & Frønes, I. (Eds.). (2009). Indicators of children's well-being: Theory and practice in a multicultural perspective (Vol. 36). Verlag: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Ben-Arieh, A., Kaufman, H. N., Andrews, B. A., George, R., Lee, B. J., & Aber, J. L. (2001). Measuring and monitoring children's well-being. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradshaw, J., Hoelscher, P., & Richardson, D. (2006). An index of child well-being in the European Union. In A. Ben-Arieh & I. Frønes (Eds.), Indicators of children’s well-being: Theory and practice in a multi-cultural perspective (pp. 325–371). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Christensen, P., James, A., & Jenks, C. (2000). Home and movement: Children constructing “family time”. In S. Holloway & G. Valentine (Eds.), Children’s geographies: Playing, living, learning (pp. 135–150). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Darbyshire, P., Macdougall, C., & Schiller, W. (2005). Multiple methods in qualitative research with children: More insight or just more? Qualitative Research, 5, 417–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elsley, S. (2004). Children’s experiences of public space. Children and Society, 18, 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fattore, T., Mason, J., & Watson, E. (2007). Children’s conceptualisation(s) of their well-being. Social Indicators Research, 80(1), 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fattore, T., Mason, J., & Watson, E. (2012). Locating the child centrally as subject in research: Towards a child interpretation of well-being. Child Indicators Research, 5, 423–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fattore, T., Mason, J., & Watson, E. (2016). Children’s understandings of well-being: Towards a child standpoint. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Greene, S., & Hill, M. (2004). Researching children’s experience: Methods and methodological issues. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  17. Holloway, S., & Valentine, G. (2000). Spatiality and the new social studies of childhood. Sociology, 34(4), 763–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holloway, S., Valentine, G., & Bingham, N. (2000). Transforming cyberspace: Children’s interventions in the new public sphere. In S. Holloway & G. Valentine (Eds.), Children’s geographies: Playing, living, learning (pp. 135–150). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Hunner-Kreisel, C., & Kuhn, M. (2010). Children’s perspective: Methodological critiques and empirical studies. In S. Andresen, I. Diehm, U. Sander, & H. Ziegler (Eds.), Children and the good life: New challenges for research on children (pp. 115–118). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. James, S. (1990). Is there a “place” for children in geography? Area, 22, 278–283.Google Scholar
  21. James, A., Jenks, C., & Prout, A. (1998). Theorizing childhood. Cambridge: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  22. Jans, M. (2004). Children as citizens. Towards a contemporary notion of child participation. Childhood, 11(1), 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jenks, C. (1996). Childhood. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Jones, D., O’Brien, M., Rustin, M., & Sloan, D. (2000). Children’s independent social mobility in the urban public realm. Childhood, 7(3), 257–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kjorholt, A. T. (2008). Children as new citizens: In the best interest of the child? In A. James & A. L. James (Eds.), European childhoods: Cultures, politics and childhoods in Europe (pp. 14–37). New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leonard, M. (2007). Trapped in space? Children’s accounts of risky environments. Children and Society, 21, 432–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lister, R. (2007). Why citizenship: Where, when and how children? Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8(2), 692–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marr, P., & Malone, K. (2006). What about me? Children as co-researchers. Available at: http://www.aare.edu.au/07pap/mar07118.pdf.
  29. Matthews, H., & Limb, M. (1999). Defining an agenda for the geography of children. Progress in Human Geography, 23, 6–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McKendrick, J. (2000). The geography of children: An annotated bibliography. Childhood, 7(3), 359–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morrow, V. (2001). Using qualitative methods to elicit young people’s perspectives on their environments: Some ideas for community health initiatives. Health Education Research, 16(3), 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nelson, M. L., & Quintana, S. M. (2005). Qualitative clinical research with children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34(2), 344–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Philo, C. (2000). The intimate geographies of childhood, special issue: Spaces of childhood. Childhood, 7(3), 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Prout, A., & James, A. (2005). A new paradigm for the sociology of childhood? Provenance, promises and the problems. In A. James & A. Prout (Eds.), Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood (pp. 7–33). Bristol: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  35. Qvortrup, J. (1994). Childhood matters: An introduction. In J. Qvortrup, M. Brady, G. Sgritta, & H. Wintersberger (Eds.), Childhood matters: Social theory, practice and politics (pp. 1–24). Vienna: Avebury.Google Scholar
  36. Qvortrup, J. (2007). Editorial: A reminder. Childhood, 14(4), 395–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Qvortrup, J. (2009). Childhood as structural form. In J. Qvortrup, W. Corsaro, & M. S. Honig (Eds.), Palgrave handbook of childhood studies (pp. 21–33). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Richardson, D., Hoelscher, P., & Bradshaw, J. (2008). Child well-being in central and eastern European countries (CEE) and common wealth of independent states (CIS). Child Indicators Research, I, 211–250.Google Scholar
  39. Sibley, D. (1995). Families and domestic routines. In S. Pile & N. Thrift (Eds.), Mapping the subject: Geographies of cultural transformation (pp. 123–137). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Sixsmith, J., Gabhainn, S. N., Fleming, C., & O’Higgins, S. (2007). Children’s, parents’ and teachers’ perceptions of child well-being. Health Education, 107(6), 511–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Uyan-Semerci, P., Muderrisoglu, S., Karatay, A., Akkan, B., Kılıc, Z., Oy, B., & Uran, S. (2012). Eşitsiz Bir Toplumda Çocukluk: Çocuğun “İyi Olma Hali”ni Anlamak İstanbul Örneği. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Başak Akkan
    • 1
  • Serra Müderrisoglu
    • 2
  • Pınar Uyan-Semerci
    • 3
  • Emre Erdogan
    • 3
  1. 1.Graduate Program in Social Policy and Social Policy ForumBogaziçi UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Psychology DepartmentBogaziçi UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  3. 3.International Relations DepartmentIstanbul Bilgi UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations