Advertisement

Considering the Natural Environment in the Creation of Child-Friendly Cities: Implications for Children’s Subjective Well-Being

  • Sabirah Adams
  • Shazly Savahl
  • Maria Florence
  • Kyle Jackson
Article
  • 119 Downloads

Abstract

A critical aspect in the creation of child-friendly cities (CFC’s) is the consideration of the natural environment. Premised on a child participatory perspective, the current study explored children’s constructions and the meanings they attached to natural spaces and the impact on their subjective well-being. A qualitative methodological framework was employed using four focus group interviews with 32 children between the ages of 13 and 14 years. The study was conducted in a low socio-economic status community on the Cape Flats in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Within the thematic domain of CFC’s three key themes emerged from the data, namely Child and Environmentally friendly neighbourhoods, Environmentally friendly spaces and places for children, and Environmental awareness in the school curriculum. It was found that children consider nature as crucial in the creation of a CFC. Further, the participants revealed that their community is not child friendly, and suggested the need for the participation of children on matters which affect their lives. With natural spaces specified as children’s favourite places in this study, and the manifest advantages of children’s engagement therein, it is crucial to harness children’s access to safe natural spaces in their communities.

Keywords

child-friendly cities nature children’s subjective well-being thematic analysis South Africa 

References

  1. Abrahams, N., Mathews, S., Martin, L. J., Lombard, C., & Jewkes, R. (2013). Intimate Partner Femicide in South Africa in 1999 and 2009. PLoS Med, 10(4), e1001412.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, S., & Savahl, S. (2015). Children’s perceptions of the natural environment: A south African perspective. Children’s Geographies, 13(2), 196–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams, S., & Savahl, S. (2016). Children’s discourses of natural spaces: Consideration for children’s subjective well-being. Child Indicators Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-016-9374-2
  4. Adams, S., Savahl, S., & Casas, F. (2016). The relationship between Children’s perceptions of the natural environment and their subjective well-being. Children’s Geographies.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2016.115751
  5. Adams, S., Savahl, S., & Fattore, T. (2017). Children’s representations of nature using photovoice and community mapping: Perspectives from South Africa. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2017.1333900.
  6. Aitken, S. (2001). Geographies of Young People: The Morally Contested Spaces of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Artz, L., Burton, P., Leoschut, L., Ward, C. L., & Lloyd, S. (2016). Sexual abuse of children and adolescents in South Africa. Augustinerhof: Optimus Foundation.Google Scholar
  8. Attfield, R. (2006). Is the concept of nature indispensable. Ludus Vitalis, 14(25), 105–116.Google Scholar
  9. Bannerjee, K., & Driskell, D. (2002). Tales from truth town: Children’s lives in a south Indian ‘slum’. In L. Chawla (Ed.), Growing up in an Urbanising world. London: Earthscan/UNESCO.Google Scholar
  10. Ben-Arieh, A., Casas, F., Frønes, I., & Korbin, J. E. (2014). Multifaceted concept of child well-being. In A. Ben-Arieh, F. Casas, I. Frones, & J. E. Korbin (Eds.), Handbook of child well-being: Theories, methods and policies in global perspective (pp. 1–25). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beneker, T., Sanders, R., Tani, S., & Taylor, L. (2010). Picturing the city: Young people’s representations of urban environments. Children’s Geographies, 8(2), 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Benninger, E., & Savahl, S. (2016). The use of visual methods to explore how children construct and assign meaning to the “self” within two urban communities in the western cape, South Africa. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Health and Well-Being, 11.  https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v11.31251
  13. Bird, W. (2007). Natural thinking: Investigating the links between the natural environment, biodiversity and mental health (First ed.). England: Report for the Royal Society for the Protection of birds.Google Scholar
  14. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bridgman, R. (2004). Criteria for best practices in building child-friendly cities: Involving young people in urban planning and design. Canadian Journal of Urban Planning, 13(2), 337–346.Google Scholar
  16. Broberg, A., Kyttä, M., & Fagerholm, N. (2013). Child-friendly urban structures: Bullerby revisited. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 110–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Casas, F. (2000). Quality of life and the life experience of children. In E. Verhellen (Ed.), Understanding Children’s rights. Ghent: University of Ghent.Google Scholar
  18. Casas, F. (2016). Children, adolescents and quality of life: The social sciences perspective over two decades. In F. Maginno (Ed.), A life devoted to quality of life: Festschrift in honor of Alex C. Michalos (pp. 3–21). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chatterjee, S. (2005). Children’s friendship with place: A conceptual inquiry. Children, Youth and Environments, 15(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
  20. Chatterjee, S. (2006). Children's friendship with place: An exploration of environmental child friendliness of children's environments in cities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. North Carolina: North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
  21. Chawla, L. (1988). Children’s concern for the natural environment. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 5(3), 13–20.Google Scholar
  22. Chawla, L. (1997). Growing up in an urbanizing world (editor and co-author). Paris: UNESCO Publishing/Earthscan.Google Scholar
  23. Chawla, L. (2000). Special place- what is that? Significant and secret spaces in the lives of children in a Johannesburg squatter camp: Children outside childhood. Michigan Quarterly Review, 39(2), 378–398.Google Scholar
  24. Chawla, L. (2002). Insight, creativity and thoughts on the environment: Integrating children and youth into human settlement development. Environment and Urbanization, 14(2), 11–22.Google Scholar
  25. Chawla, L. (2007). Childhood experiences associated with Care for the Natural World: A theoretical framework for empirical results. Children, Youth and Environments, 17(4), 144–170.Google Scholar
  26. Coulton, C. J., & Korbin, J. E. (2007). Indicators of child well-being through a neighbourhood lens. Social Indicators Research, 84, 349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Crist, E. (2004). Against the social construction of nature and wilderness. Environmental Ethics, 26(1), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dickinson, E. (2013). The misdiagnosis: Rethinking “nature-deficit disorder”. Environmental Communication.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2013.802704
  29. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Driskell, D. (2002). Creating better cities with children and youth. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  32. Fattore, T., Fegter, S., & Hunner-Kreisel, C. (2016). Child well-being and cultural contingency: A study of global child well-being. ISA Sociology of Childhood Newsletter (forthcoming). Google Scholar
  33. Field, R. (1994). Children, community and pollution control: Toward a community-oriented environmentalism. Childhood, 2, 28–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Freeman, C. (1995). Planning and play: Creating greener environments. Children’s Environments, 12(3), 164–176.Google Scholar
  35. Galli, F., Castellá-Sarriera, J., & Bedin, L. (2016). Childhood, environment and subjective well-being / Infancia, ambiente y bienestar subjetivo. Psyecology.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2016.1138666
  36. Giddens, A. (1994). Beyond left and right. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  37. Gleeson, B., & Sipe, N. G. (Eds.). (2006). Creating child friendly cities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Griesel, R. D., Swart-Kruger, J., & Chawla, L. (2002). Children in south African can make a difference’: An assessment of ‘growing up in cities’ in Johannesburg. Childhood, 9(1), 83–100.Google Scholar
  39. Haikkola, L., Pacilli, M.P. Horelli, L. and Prezza, M. (2007). “Interpretations of urban child-friendliness: A comparative study of two neighborhoods in Helsinki and Rome.” Children, Youth and Environments 17(4), 319–351.Google Scholar
  40. Hart, R. A. (1979). Children’s experience of place. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  41. Hart, R. A. (1987). Children’s participation in planning and design: Theory, research and practice. In Weinstein C, David T (Eds). Spaces for children. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  42. Hart, R. A. (1992). Children’s participation: From tokenism to citizenship. Florence: UNICEF.Google Scholar
  43. Hart, R. A. (1994). Children’s role in primary environmental care. Childhood, 2, 92–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hart, R. A. (1997). Children’s participation: The theory and practice of involving young Citizen’s in community development and environmental care. New York: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  45. Hart, R. A., & Chawla, L. (1982). The development of children’s concern for the environment. Zeitschrift für Umelweltpolitik, 4, 271–294.Google Scholar
  46. Hashimoto-Martell, E. A., McNeill, K. L., & Hoffman, E. M. (2011). Connecting urban youth with their environment: The impact of an urban ecology course on student content knowledge, environmental attitudes and responsible behaviors. Research in Science Education, 41, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Helliwell, J. F., Barrington-Leigh, C., Harris, A., & Huang, H. (2009). International evidence on the social context of well-being. In E. Diener, D. Kahneman, & J. F. Helliwell (Eds.), International differences in well-being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Hordyk, S. R., Dulude, M., & Shema, M. (2014). When nature nurtures children: Nature as a containing and holding space. Children’s Geographies, 13(5), 571–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Horelli, L. (1998). Creating child-friendly environments: Case studies on children’s participation in three European countries. Childhood, 5(2), 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Horelli, L., & Vepsä, K. (1994). In search of supportive structures for everyday life. In I. Altman & A. Churchman (Eds.), Women and the Environment: Human Behavior and Environment (volume 13). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  51. Howe, R. W., & Disinger, J. F. (1988). Environmental education that makes a difference-knowledge to behavior changes: ERIC/SMEAC. Environmental. Education Digest, 4, 1–12.Google Scholar
  52. Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Isaacs, S. A., & Savahl, S. (2013). A qualitative inquiry investigating adolescents' sense of hope within a context of violence in a disadvantaged community in cape town. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(2), 269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. James, A., & James, A. L. (2004). Constructing childhood. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jenks, C. (1982). Childhood. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Jenks, C. (2005). Childhood (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (2002). Chapter 4: Adolescents and the natural environment: A time out? In P. H. Kahn Jr. & S. R. Kellert (Eds.), Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  58. Kellert, S. (2005). Building for life: Designing and understanding the human-nature connection. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
  59. Kerret, D., Ronen, T., & Orkibi, H. (2014). Green perspective for a hopeful future: Explaining green schools’ contribution to environmental subjective well-being. Review of General Psychology, 18(2), 82–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kingston, B., Wridt, P., Chawla, L., van Vliet, W., & Brink, L. B. (2007). Creating child friendly cities: The case of Denver. Municipal Engineer, 160(2), 97–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kjørholt, A. T. (2002). Small is powerful: Discourses on ‘children and participation’ in Norway. Childhood, 9(1), 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kuo, F. E., Sullivan, W. C., Coley, R. L., & Brunson, L. (1998). Fertile ground for community: Inner-City neighborhood common spaces. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26(6), 823–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lekies, K. S., Eames-Sheavly, M., MacDonald, L., & Wong, K. J. (2007). Greener voices: Strategies to increase the participation of children and youth in gardening activities. Children, Youth and Environments, 17(2), 517–526.Google Scholar
  65. Long, D. C. (1969). Descartes' Argument for Mind-Body Dualism. The Philosophical Forum, 1(3), 259–273.Google Scholar
  66. Lynch, K. (1977). Growing up in cities: Studies of the spatial environment of adolescence in Cracow, Melbourne, Mexico City, Salta, Toluca, and Warszawa. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  67. MacDougall, C., Schiller, W., & Darbyshire. (2009). What are our boundaries and where can we play? Perspectives from eight- to ten-year-old Australian metropolitan and rural children. Early Child Development and Care, 179(2), 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Macnaghten, P. (1993). Discourses of nature: Argumentation and power. In E. Burman & I. Parker (Eds.), Discourse analytic research: Repertoires and readings of texts in action (pp. 52–72). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Macnaghten, P., & Urry, J. (1999). Contested Natures. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  70. Malone, K. (2015). Theorizing a child–dog encounter in the slums of La Paz using post-humanistic approaches in order to disrupt universalisms in current ‘child in nature’ debates. Children's Geographies.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2015.1077369
  71. Malone, K. (2016). Reconsidering children’s encounters with nature and place using Posthumanism. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 32, 42–56.  https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2015.48 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mathews, S., & Martin, L. J. (2016). Developing an understanding of fatal child abuse and neglect: Results from the south African child death review pilot study. South African Medical Journal, 106(12), 1160–1163.  https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2016.v106i12.12130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Mayall, B. (Ed.). (1994). Children’s childhoods: Observed and explained. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  74. McKendrick, J. H. (2014). Geographies of children’s well-being: In, of and for space. In A. Ben-Arieh, F. Casas, I. Frones, & J. E. Korbin (Eds.), Handbook of child well-being: Theories, methods and policies in global perspective (pp. 279–300). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. McKibben’s, B. (1990). The end of nature. London: Viking.Google Scholar
  76. Michelson, W. (1977). Environmental choice, human behaviour and residential satisfaction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Mniki, N., & Rosa, S. (2007). Heroes in action: Child advocates in South Africa. Children, Youth and Environments, 17(3), 179–187.Google Scholar
  78. Monroe, M. C. (2003). Two avenues for encouraging conservation behaviors. Human Ecology Review, 10(2), 113–125.Google Scholar
  79. Moore, R. C. (1986). Childhood’s domain. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  80. Moses, S. (2008). Children and participation in South Africa: An overview. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 16, 327–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Nordström, M. (2010). Children’s views on child-friendly environments in different geographical, cultural and social Neighbourhoods. Urban Studies, 47(3), 514–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Okecha, K. (2011). Regime politics and service delivery in the cape town unicity council area. Urban Forum, 22(1), 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Palmer, J. A., & Suggate, J. (2004). The development of children’s understanding of distant places and environmental issues: Report of UK longitudinal study of the development of ideas between the ages of 4 and 10 years. Research Papers in Education, 19(2), 205–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Parkes, J. (2007). The multiple meanings of violence: Children’s talk about life in a south African neighbourhood. Childhood, 14(4), 401–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Parsons, A. (2011). Young children and nature: Outdoor play and development, experiences fostering environmental consciousness, and the implications on playground design. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University: Unpublished Master’s thesis. Virginia.Google Scholar
  86. Phenice, L. A., & Griffore, R. J. (2003). Young children and the natural environment. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 4(2), 167–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Piaget, J. (1977). The role of action in the development of thinking. In W. F. Overton & J. M. Gallagher (Eds.), Advances in research and theory. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  88. Pollard, E. L., & Lee, P. D. (2003). Child well-being: A systematic review of the literature. Social Indicators Research, 61(1), 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Ponds, P. D., & Schuster, R. M. (2011). The constraints of connecting children with nature- A research literature review: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report.Google Scholar
  90. Pretty, G., Imison, A., & Reimann, A. (2003). No better place than here: Adolescents' sense of place and their use of community sites and activities to feel better. Australian Journal of Psychology. [abstract], 204.Google Scholar
  91. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon and Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Ramezani, S., & Said, I. (2013). Children’s nomination of friendly places in an urban neighbourhood in shiraz, Iran. Children’s Geographies, 11(1), 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Rasmussen, K. (2002). Places for children- Children’s places. Childhood, 11(2), 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness. London: Pion Ltd..Google Scholar
  95. Rottle, N. D., & Johnson, J. M. (2007). Youth design participation to support ecological literacy: Reflections on charrettes for an outdoor learning laboratory. Children, Youth and Environments, 17(2), 484–502.Google Scholar
  96. SAHRC & UNICEF. (2016). Global goals for every child: Progress and disparities among children in South Africa. Pretoria: UNICEF South Africa.Google Scholar
  97. Sandin, B. (2014). History of children’s well-being. In a. Ben-Arieh, F. Casas, I. Frones, & J. E. Korbin (Eds.), Handbook of child well-being: Theories, methods and policies in global perspective (pp. 31–86). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  98. Savahl, S., Casas, F., & Adams, S. (2017a). Children’s Subjective Well-being: Multi-Group Analysis Among a Sample of Children from Two Socio-Economic Status Groups in the Western Cape, South Africa. Child Indicators Research, 10(2), 473–488.Google Scholar
  99. Savahl, S., Adams, S., Isaacs, S., Hendricks, G., & Noordien, Z. (2015a). Subjective Wellbeing Amongst a Sample of South African Children: A Descriptive Study. Child Indicators Research., 8(1), 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Savahl, S., Malcolm, C., Slembrouk, S., Adams, S., Willenberg, I., & September, R. (2015b). Discourses on well-being. Child Indicators Research, 8(4), 747–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Savahl, S., Tiliouine, H., Casas, F., Adams, A., Mekonen, Y., Dejene, N., Benninger, E., & Witten, H. (2017b). Children's subjective well-being in Africa: A comparative analysis across three countries. Children and Youth Services Review, 80, 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Scianis, V. (2013). The influence of nature on secondary school students’ subjective well-being in England and Greece. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Department of Geography and Environment, The London School of Economics and Political Science: London.Google Scholar
  103. Sener, T. (2006). The children and architecture project in Turkey. Children, Youth and Environments, 16(2), 191–206.Google Scholar
  104. September, R., & Savahl, S. (2009). Children’s perspectives on child well-being. Social Work Practitioner/Researcher, 21(1), 23–40.Google Scholar
  105. Shaw, L. G. (1987). Designing playgrounds for able and disabled children. In C. S. David & T. G. Weinstein (Eds.), Spaces for children: The built environment and child development. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  106. Statistics South Africa. (2017). Victims of crime survey 2016/2017. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.Google Scholar
  107. Swart-Kruger, J. (2000). Growing up in Canaansland: Children’s recommendations on improving a squatter camp environment. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.Google Scholar
  108. Swart-Kruger, J., & Chawla, L. (2002). “We know something someone doesn’t know”: Children speak out on local conditions in Johannesburg. Environment and Urbanisation, 14(2), 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Taylor, A. (2011). Reconceptualising the nature of childhood. Childhood, 18(4), 420–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Thomson, J. L., & Philo, C. (2004). Playful spaces? A social geography of children's play in Livingston, Scotland. Children's Geographies, 2(1), 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  112. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2009). Child friendly cities. Retrieved 10 Jan 2011 from: http://www.childfriendlycities.org/en/to-learn-more/examples-of-cfc-initiatives/south-africa.
  113. Venhoeven, L. A., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2013). Explaining the paradox: How proenvironmental behaviour can both thwart and foster well-being. Sustainability, 5, 1372–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Wals, A. E. J. (1994). Nobody planted it, it just grew! Young adolescents’ perceptions and the experience of nature in the context of urban environmental education. Children’s Environments, 11(3), 1–27.Google Scholar
  115. Wang, F., & Wang, D. (2016). Place, Geographical Context and Subjective Wellbeing: State of Art and Future Directions. In D. Wang & S. He (Eds.), Mobility, Sociability and Wellbeing of Urban Living (pp. 189–230). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Ward, C. (1977). The child in the city. London: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  117. Wells, N. M. (2000). At home with nature : Effects of “greenness” on Children's cognitive functioning. Environment and Behavior, 32(6), 775–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Wells, N. M. (2014). The role of nature in children’s resilience: Cognitive and social processes. In K. G. Tidball & M. E. Krasny (Eds.), Greening in the red zone: Disaster, resilience and community greening (pp. 95–110). Springer Dordrecht: Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. White, R. (2004). Young Children's relationship with nature: Its importance to Children's development and the Earth's future. Kansas: White Hutchinson Leisure and Learning Group.Google Scholar
  120. Wilks, J. (2010). Child-friendly cities: A place for active citizenship in geographical and environmental education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 19(9), 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Wilson, R. (1997). The wonders of nature- honoring children’s way of knowing: Early. Childhood News, 6, 19–28.Google Scholar
  122. World Bank. (2012). Annual Report 2012. World Bank. www.timeslive.co.za. https://www.timeslive.co.za/news/south-africa/2017-10-09-66-child-murders-and-counting/. Accessed 20 Oct 2017.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of the Western CapeBellvilleSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations