Advertisement

Internet Use by Children Aged six to nine: Parents’ Beliefs and Knowledge about Risk Prevention

  • Gemma Pons-Salvador
  • Xud Zubieta-Méndez
  • Dolores Frias-Navarro
Article

Abstract

The majority of studies on children’s Internet use have focused on children aged 9 years or older. However, children start using the Internet at increasingly younger ages, making research on these children necessary. Available studies warn that parents should be aware of the importance of protecting minors when using the Internet. This study focuses on the evaluation of parents’ beliefs and knowledge about their 6 to 9-year-old children’s Internet use. The sample is composed of 1827 parents who received a specially designed questionnaire. Results of the descriptive analysis show that 78% of children of these ages use the Internet, mainly for homework and games. Most of the parents are aware of the benefits and risks of the Internet, but roughly half of them state that they do not know how to set up content filters or parental controls, which is rather relevant, taking into account that 40% of these young children are sometimes left alone when online. At this age, some children have already had a bad experience when using the Internet. This study highlights the importance of working with parents and their children from very young ages in order to prevent victimization.

Keywords

Internet Children 6–9 year olds Parents’ beliefs Risks prevention Parental mediation 

Supplementary material

12187_2018_9529_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (271 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 271 kb)
12187_2018_9529_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (268 kb)
ESM 2 (PDF 267 kb)

References

  1. Alvarez-García, D., Barreiro-Collado, A., & Núñez, J. (2017). Ciberagresión entre adolescentes: prevalencia y diferencias de género [Cyberaggression among Adolescents: Prevalence and Gender Differences]. Comunicar, 50(XXV), 89-97.  https://doi.org/10.3916/C50-2017-08.
  2. Buelga, S., Cava, M. J., Musitu, G., & Torralba, E. (2015). Cyberbullying aggressors among Spanish secondary education students: An exploratory study. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 12(2), 100–115.  https://doi.org/10.1108/itse-08-2014-0025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chaudron, S. (2015). Young children (0–8) and digital technology. A qualitative exploratory study across seven countries. Publications Office of the European Union. http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC93239
  4. Childwise. (2012). The monitor pre-school report 2012: Key behaviour patterns among 0 to 4 year olds. England: Norwich.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  6. Duerager, A., & Livingstone, S. (2012). How can parents support children’s internet safety? London: EU Kids Online Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/42872/Google Scholar
  7. Ey, L. A., & Cupit, C. G. (2011). Exploring young children’s understanding of risks associated with internet usage and their concepts of management strategies. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 9(1), 53–65.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X10367471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Findahl, O. (2012). Swedes and the Internet 2012. Retrieved from http://www.iis.se/docs/Swedesand-the-Internet-2012.pdf.
  9. Garaigordobil, M. (2015). Ciberbullying en adolescentes y jóvenes del País Vasco: Cambios con la edad. Anales de Psicología, 31(3), 1069–1076.  https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.31.3.179151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garmendia, M., Garitaonandia, C., Martínez, G., & Casado, M. A. (2011). Riesgos y seguridad en internet. Los menores españoles en &2Pons&3el contexto europeo. Bilbao: EU Kids Online Retrieved from http://www.eukidsonline.netGoogle Scholar
  11. Helsper, E. J., Kalmus, V., Hasebrink, U., Sagvari, B., & de Haan, J. (2013). Country classification: Opportunities, risks, harm and parental mediation. London: EU Kids Online, London School of Economics Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/52023/Google Scholar
  12. Holloway, D., Green, L., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Zero to eight. In Young children and their internet use Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/52630/Google Scholar
  13. Internet World States. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.internetworldstats.com/.
  14. Işika, B., & Alkayab, S. A. (2017). Internet use and psychosocial health of school aged children. Psychiatry Research, 255, 204–208.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.05.043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones, L. M., Mitchell, K. J., & Finkelhor, D. (2013). Online harassment in context: Trends from three youth internet safety surveys (2000, 2005, 2010). Psychology of Violence, 3(1), 53–69.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kimberly, J. D., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. (2001). Risk factors for and impact of online sexual solicitation of youth. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(23), 3011–3014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee, B.H. (2017). Explaining cyber deviance among school-aged youth. Child Indicators Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-017-9450-2.
  18. Lepicnik, J., & Samec, P. (2013). Uso de tecnologías en el entorno familiar en niños de cuatro años de Eslovenia [Communication Technology in the Home Environment of Four-year-old Children (Slovenia)]. Comunicar, 40(XX), 119-126.  https://doi.org/10.3916/C40-2013-03-02.
  19. Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L. (2009). EU kids online: Final report. LSE, London: EU Kids Online Network.Google Scholar
  20. Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671–696.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807080335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2008). Parental mediation and Chil-dren’s internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581–599.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A. & Ólafsson, K. (2011a). Risks and safety on the internet: The perspective of European children. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33731/.
  23. Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A. & Ólafsson, K. (2011b). EU Kids Online. The final report. EU Kids Online Network. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/39351/.
  24. Lloret, D., Cabrera, V., & Sanz, Y. (2013). Relaciones entre hábitos de uso de videojuegos, control parental y rendimiento escolar. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 3(3), 237–248.Google Scholar
  25. Martin, P., & Bateson, P. (2008). Measuring behavior: An introductory guide (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mascheroni, G. & Ólafsson, K. (2014). Net Children Go Mobile. Risks and opportunities (2nd ed.). Milano. Educatt. Retrieved from www.netchildrengomobile.eu/.
  27. McKenney, S., & Voogt, J. (2010). Technology and young children: How 4-7 year olds perceive their own use of computers. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 656–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mitchell, K. J., Wolak, J., & Finkelhor, D. (2008). Are blogs putting youth at risk for online sexual solicitation and harassment? Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 277–294.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.04.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Montiel, I., Carbonell, E., & Pereda, N. (2016). Multiple online victimization of Spanish adolescents: Results from a community sample. Child Abuse & Neglect, 52, 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Navarro, R., Yubero, S., Larrañaga, E., et al. (2012). Children’s cyberbullying victimization: Associations with social anxiety and social competence in a Spanish sample. Child Indicators Research, 5(2), 281–295.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-011-9132-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ólafsson, K., Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L. (2014). Children’s use of online Technologies in Europe. A review of the European evidence base. London: EU Kids Online Network Retrieved from http://www2.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/EUKidsOnline/EU%20Kids%20Online%20reports.aspxGoogle Scholar
  32. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives. Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–2 Retrieved from http://www.marcprensky.com/writingCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Scott, J. (2016). Children and the internet: An exploration of year 5 pupils’ online experiences and perceptions of risk. Fields: journal of Huddersfield student research, 2(1).  https://doi.org/10.5920/fields.2016.2121.
  34. Tarapdar, S., Kellett, M., & People, Y. (2013). Cyberbullying: Insights and age-comparison indicators from a youth-led study in England. Child Indicators Research, 6(3), 461–477.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-012-9177-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Teimouri, M., Hassan, M. S., Griffiths, M., et al. (2016). Assessing the validity of western measurement of online risks to children in an Asian Contex. Child Indicators Research, 9(2), 407–428.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-015-9316-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Teuwen, J., De Groff, D., & Zaman, B. (2012). Flemish preschoolers online: A mixed-method approach to explore online use, preferences and the role of parents and siblings. Leuven, Belgica: Etmaal van de Communicatiewetenschap Retrieved from http://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/350708/1/Flemish+Preschoolers+Online_English+version.pdfGoogle Scholar
  37. Wolak, J. D., Mitchell, K., & Finkelhor, D. (2007). Unwanted and wanted exposure to online pornography in a National Sample of youth internet users. Official Journal of American Academy of Pediatrics, 119(2), 247–257.Google Scholar
  38. Ybarra, M. L., Mitchell, K. J., Wolak, J., & Finkelhor, D. (2006). Examining characteristics and associated distress related to internet harassment: Findings from the second youth internet safety survey. Pediatrics, 118(4), 1169–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ybarra, M. L., Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K. J., & Wolak, J. (2009). Associations between blocking, monitoring, and filtering software on the home computer and youth-reported unwanted exposure to sexual material online. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33, 857–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Basic Psychology, Faculty of PsychologyUniversity of ValenciaValenciaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Methodology of the Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of PsychologyUniversity of ValenciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations