Child Indicators Research

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 711–728 | Cite as

How to Reach the Sustainable Development Goal 1.2? Simulating Different Strategies to Reduce Multidimensional Child Poverty in Two Middle-Income Countries

  • Lucia FerroneEmail author
  • Yekaterina Chzhen


Although the UN Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) have contributed to substantial progress in reducing the number of people living on less than $1.25 a day since 1990, it is now generally accepted that poverty goes beyond the simple lack of income. The new Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) adopted by all member states of the United Nations (UN) in September 2015 call for “reducing at least by half the proportion of men, women and children of all ages living in poverty in all its dimensions according to national definitions” by 2030 (UNDESA 2016). Although there must be numerous ways of achieving this goal, research evidence on reducing multidimensional poverty is scarce. This paper investigates possible strategies for halving MD poverty among children using the case studies of Armenia and Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH). Both Armenia and BiH conducted multidimensional child poverty studies in 2014–2016 based on nationally agreed definitions and using secondary data from representative household budget surveys. This analysis compares two approaches to halving the rate of multidimensional poverty among children aged 5–15 by employing static simulations: 1) reducing deprivation headcount in two to three key dimensions and 2) increasing monetary transfers to the consumption-poor.


Child poverty Multidimensional deprivation Armenia Bosnia-Herzegovina 



The authors are grateful to the UNICEF offices in Armenia and Bosnia and Herzegovina as well as their partners at the statistical agencies for giving access to the data for studying multidimensional child poverty. The views and analysis in this paper are the responsibility of the authors alone.


  1. Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7), 476–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chzhen, Y. (2016). Unemployment, social protection spending and child poverty in the European Union during the great recession (pp. 1–15). Online First: Journal of European Social Policy. doi: 10.1177/0958928716676549.Google Scholar
  3. Chzhen, Y., de Neubourg, C., Plavgo, I., & de Milliano, M. (2016). Child poverty in the European Union: The multiple overlapping deprivation analysis approach (EU-MODA). Child Indicators Research, 9(2), 335–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chzhen, Y., & Ferrone, L. (2016). Multidimensional child deprivation and poverty measurement: Case study of Bosnia and Herzegovina (pp. 1–16). Online First: Social Indicators Research.Google Scholar
  5. Davis, B., & Handa, S. (2015). How much do programmes pay? Transfer size in selected national cash transfer programmes in sub-Saharan Africa. Innocenti Research Brief, 20151.Google Scholar
  6. Davis, B., Handa, S., Hypher, N., Winters, P., Rossi, N. W., & Yablonski, J. (2016). From evidence to action: The story of cash transfers and impact evaluation in sub Saharan Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Milliano, M., & Handa, S. (2014). Child poverty and deprivation in Mali–the first national estimates. UNICEF Office of Research Working Paper, WP-2014-20.Google Scholar
  8. de Neubourg, C., Chai, J., de Milliano, M., Plavgo, I., & Wei, Z. (2012). Step-by-step guidelines to the multiple overlapping deprivation analysis (MODA). UNICEF Office of Research Working Paper, WP-2012-10.Google Scholar
  9. Duclos, J.-Y., & Tiberti, L. (2016). Multidimensional poverty indices: A critical assessment. Centre Interuniversitaire sur le Risque, Les Politiques Économiques et L’emploi (CIRPÉE) Working Paper, 161. Accessed 29 July 2016.
  10. European Union. (2014). Living conditions in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  11. Ferrone, L., & Chzhen, Y. (2015). Child poverty and deprivation in Bosnia and Herzegovina: National multiple overlapping deprivation analysis (N-MODA). UNICEF Office of Research Working Paper, WP-2015-02.Google Scholar
  12. Ferrone, L., & Chzhen, Y. (2016). Child poverty in Armenia: National multiple overlapping deprivation analysis. UNICEF Office of Research Working Paper, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  13. Fiszbein, A., & Schady, N. R. (2009). Conditional cash transfers: Reducing present and future poverty. World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Foster, J., Greer, J., & Thorbecke, E. (1984). A class of decomposable poverty measures (pp. 761–766). Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society.Google Scholar
  15. Handa, S., Seidenfeld, D., Davis, B., Tembo, G., & Zambia Cash Transfer Evaluation Team. (2016). The social and productive impacts of Zambia’s child grant. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35(2), 357–387. doi: 10.1002/pam.21892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hjelm, L., Ferrone, L., Handa, S., & Chzhen, Y. (2016). Comparing approaches to measure multidimensional child poverty. UNICEF Office of Research Working Paper, 29.Google Scholar
  17. Nolan, B., & Marx, I. (2009). Economic inequality, poverty, and social exclusion. In W. Salverda, B. Nolan, & T. M. Smeeding (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of economic inequality (pp. 315–341). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Notten, G., & Guio, A.-C. (2016). The impact of social transfers on income poverty and material deprivation. London: Presented at the APPAM International Conference Accessed 20 July 2016.Google Scholar
  19. Robano, V., & Smith, S. C. (2014). Multidimensional targeting and evaluation: A general framework with an application to a poverty program in Bangladesh. OPHI Working Paper, 65. Accessed 29 July 2016.
  20. Singh, R., & Sarkar, S. (2015). Children’s experience of multidimensional deprivation: Relationship with household monetary poverty. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 56, 43–56. doi: 10.1016/j.qref.2014.06.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Soares, F. V., Ribas, R. P., & Osório, R. G. (2010). Evaluating the impact of Brazil’s Bolsa Família: Cash transfer programs in comparative perspective. Latin American Research Review, 45(2), 173–190.Google Scholar
  22. UNDESA. (2016). Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. Accessed 20 July 2016.
  23. United Nations. Convention on the rights of the child (1989).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UNICEF Office of Research InnocentiFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations