Social-Ecological Antecedents of Oppositional-Defiant Behavior in U.S. Schools: Findings from a Nationally Representative Sample of Early Adolescents
- 270 Downloads
This study examines social-ecological antecedents of oppositional-defiant school behavior among early adolescents in the U.S. (ages 12–14; n = 733). Using the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, the sample was drawn from the mother-child dataset, which included youth who, in the first of two years in the study (2002 or 2004), were living with their mothers and were enrolled in school. Participants had to have responded to at least one of the 13 items from a self-administered survey and their mothers had to have responded to at least one of the two items measuring oppositional-defiant school behavior in Time 1 (2002 or 2004; age 10 or 12) and Time 2 (2004 or 2006; age 12 or 14). Male sex, oppositional-defiant school behavior in Time 1, lack of cognitive stimulation, and negative peer influence were associated with oppositional-defiant school behavior in Time 2. The implications for practice from this study are discussed.
KeywordsDisobedience Early adolescence Oppositional-defiant behavior School services Social-ecological framework
The first-noted author would like to thank Dr. Mary Keegan Eamon, Associate Professor Emerita in the School of Social Work at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Her guidance and feedback contributed tremendously to this article.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors received no internal or external funding for this study and declare no conflicts of interest.
Because the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY) is a publicly available dataset, which does not allow for identification of the participants, the present study was exempted from Institutional Review Board oversight.
Because NLSY is a publicly available dataset, there are no ethical issues with regards to human participants/animals in the present study.
Because NLSY is a publicly available dataset, there are no ethical issues with regards to informed consent in the present study.
- Allison, P. D. (2001). Logistic regression using the SAS system: theory and application. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
- Bradshaw, C. P., Shaeffer, C. M., Petras, H., & Ialongo, N. (2010). Predicting negative life outcomes from early aggressive-disruptive behavior trajectories: gender differences in maladaptation across life domains. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 953–966. doi: 10.1007/s10964-009-9442-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brody, G. H., Ge, X., Conger, R., Gibbons, F. X., Murray, V. M., Gerrard, M., & Simons, R. L. (2001). The influence of neighborhood disadvantage, collective socialization, and parenting on African American children’s affiliation with deviant peers. Child Development, 72, 1231–1246. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: experiments by design and nature. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Caldwell, B., & Bradley, R. (1984). Home observation for measurement of the environment. Little Rock: University of Arkansas.Google Scholar
- Center for Human Resource Research (2004). NLSY 79 child & young adult data users guide. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
- Chamberlain, P., & Patterson, P. R. (1995). Discipline and child compliance in parenting. In M. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting, Vol. 4 (pp. 205–225). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Damon, W. (2000). Setting the stage for the development of wisdom: self-understanding and moral identity during adolescence. In W. S. Brown (Ed.), Understanding wisdom: sources, science, and society (pp. 361–391). Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation.Google Scholar
- Dinkes, R., Kemp, J., Baum, K., & Snyder, T. D. (2009). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2009. Washington, DC: (NCES 2010–012/NCJ 228478). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Science, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
- Duncan, G. J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1997). Consequences of growing up poor. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
- Eddy, J. M., Reid, J. B., & Fetrow, R. A. (2000). An elementary school-based prevention program targeting modifiable antecedents of youth delinquency and violence: linking the interests of families and teachers (LIFT). Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 165–176. doi: 10.1177/106342660000800304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eiden, R. D., Edwards, E. P., & Leonard, K. E. (2007). A conceptual model for the development of externalizing behavior problems among kindergarten children of alcoholic families: role of parenting and children’s self-regulation. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1187–1201. doi: 10.1037/0012-16184.108.40.2067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fabelo, T., Thompson, M. D., Plotkin, M., Carmichael, D., Marchbanks III, M. P., & Booth, E. A. (2011). Breaking schools' rules: a statewide study of how school discipline relates to students' success and juvenile justice involvement. New York: Council of State Governments Justice Center and the Public Policy Research Institute of Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
- Flay, B. R., & Allred, C. G. (2010). Chapter 28: the positive action program: improving academics, behavior, and character by teaching comprehensive skills for successful learning and living. In T. Lovaat, R. Toomey, & N. Clement (Eds.), International research handbook on values education and student wellbeing (pp. 471–501). Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gregory, A., & Ripski, M. B. (2008). Adolescent trust in teachers: implications for behavior in the high school classroom. School Psychology Review, 37, 337–353.Google Scholar
- Harnish, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Valente, E. (1995). Mother-child interaction quality as a partial mediator of the roles of maternal depressive symptomatology and socioeconomic status in the development of child behavior problem. Child Development, 66, 739–753. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00902.x.Google Scholar
- Hill, N. E., Castellino, D. R., Lansford, J. E., Nowlin, P., Dodge, K. A., Bates, J. E., & Pettit, G. S. (2004). Parent academic involvement as related to school behavior, achievement, and aspirations: demographic variations across adolescence. Child Development, 75, 1491–1509. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00753.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Houlihan, D., Sloane, H. N., Jones, R. N., & Patten, C. A. (1992). A review of behavioral conceptualizations and treatments of child noncompliance. Education and Treatment of Children, 15, 56–77.Google Scholar
- Hudziak, J. J., Derks, E. M., Althoff, R. R., Copeland, W., & Boomsma, D. I. (2005). The genetic and environmental contributions to oppositional defiant behavior: a multi-informant twin study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 44, 907–914. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.9.1614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hutchings, J., Bywater, T., Williams, M. E., Shakespeare, M. K., & Whitaker, C. (2009). Evidence for the extended school aged Incredible Years Parent programme with parents of high-risk 8 to 16 year olds. Retrieved, from http://www.incredibleyears.com/library/paper.asp?nMode=1&nLibraryID=599.
- Jones, V. F., & Jones, L. S. (2007). Comprehensive classroom management: creating positive learning environments. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Kawachi, I., & Kennedy, B. P. (2002). The health of nations: why inequality is harmful to your health. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
- Lahey, B. B., Schwab-Stone, M., Goodman, S. H., Waldman, I. D., Canino, G., Rathouz, P. J., & Jensen, P. S. (2000). Age and gender differences in oppositional behavior and conduct problems: a cross-sectional household study of middle childhood and adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 488–503. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.109.3.488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Leflot, G., van Lier, P. A. C., Onghena, P., & Colpin, H. (2013). The role of children’s on-task behavior in the prevention of aggressive behavior development and peer rejection: a randomized controlled study of the good behavior game in Belgian elementary classrooms. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 187–199. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2012.12.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McGinnis, J. C., Frederick, B. P., & Edwards, R. (1995). Enhancing classroom management through proactive rules and procedures. Psychology in the Schools, 32, 220–224. doi: 10.1002/1520-6807(199507)32:3<220::AID-PITS2310320309>3.0.CO;2-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McWhirter, J. J., McWhirter, B. T., McWhirter, E. H., & McWhirter, R. J. (2007). At risk youth: a comprehensive response for counselors, teachers, psychologists, and human services professionals (4th ed.). Belmont: Thomson Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
- Mendez, L. M. R., & Knoff, H. M. (2003). Who gets suspended from school and why: a demographic analysis of schools and disciplinary infractions in a large school district. Education and Treatment of Children, 26, 30–51.Google Scholar
- Miller, D., & Chen, V. (2006, December). Imputation methods document. Retrieved, from http://search-results.aset.psu.edu/search?q=imputation+methods +document&btnG=Search&client=PennState&proxystylesheet=PennState&output=xml_no_dtd&site=PRI.
- National Center for Education Statistics (n.d.). Safety in numbers: Collecting and using crime, violence, and discipline incident data to make a difference in schools. Retrieved, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/2002312.pdf.
- National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (1990). Learning disabilities: Issues on definition (1990). Retrieved, from http://www.ldonline.org/about/partners/njcld/archives.
- National Longitudinal Survey of Youth Codebook Supplement (n.d.). NLSY79 Appendix 6:1979–2004 Urban-rural variables. Retrieved, from http://www.nlsinfo.org/nlsy79/docs/79html/codesup/appen6.htm.
- Phillips, M., & Chin, T. (2004). School inequality: what do we know? In K. M. Neckerman (Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 467–519). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Resnick, M., Bearman, P., Blum, R., Bauman, K., Harris, K., Jones, J., et al. (1997). Protecting adolescents from harm: findings from the National Longitudinal Study on adolescent health. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 278, 823–832. doi: 10.1001/jama.1997.03550100049038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Robers, S., Zhang, J., & Truman, J. (2011). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2011. Washington, DC: (NCES 2012–002/NCJ 236021). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, and Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
- Rodkin, P. C. (2004). Peer ecologies of aggression and bullying. In D. L. Espelage & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: a social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 15–35). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
- Roeser, R. W., Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. C. (1996). Perceptions of the school psychological environment and early adolescents’ psychological and behavioral functioning in school. The mediating role of goals and belonging. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 408–422. doi: 10.1037/0022-06220.127.116.118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sheridan, S., Warnes, E., & Dowd, S. (2004). Home-school collaboration and bullying: an ecological approach to increase social competence in children and youth. In D. Espelage & S. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: a social ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 245–267). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Skiba, R. J., Horner, R. H., Chung, C.-G., Rausch, M. K., May, S. L., & Tobin, T. (2011). Race is not neutral: a national investigation of African American and Latino disproportionality in school discipline. School Psychology Review, 40, 85–107.Google Scholar
- Steinberg, L. (2007). Adolescence. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
- Webster-Stratton, C. (2011). The incredible years: parents, teachers, and children’s training series. Seattle: Incredible Years, Inc..Google Scholar
- Whitney, I., Smith, P. K., & Thompson, D. (1994). Bullying and children with special educational needs. In P. K. Smith & S. Sharp (Eds.), School bullying: insights and perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Zimmerman, F. J., Glew, G. M., Christakis, D. A., & Katon, W. (2005). Early cognitive stimulation, emotional support, and television watching as predictors of subsequent bullying among grade-school children. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 159, 384–388. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.159.4.384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar