Child Indicators Research

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 825–837 | Cite as

Association Between Grandparental Co-Residence and Early Childhood Injury in the UK

Article

Abstract

In contemporary Western societies, accidents and injuries are the most common cause of death in early childhood. This makes them a major social and health policy issue and an important child well-being indicator. Here we compared the risk of home injuries between children who co-reside in three-generational households with grandparents and children who do not co-reside with grandparents. Moreover, we investigate whether grandparental presence is associated with decreased injuries in different risk situations, measured by family- and child-related factors. Using the British Millennium Cohort Study (n = 12,319 children between the ages of 9 months and 3 years), we found that children who co-reside with grandparents had a lower probability of home injuries than children who do not co-reside with grandparents. In addition, grandparental co-residence was associated with a decreased risk of injuries more strongly in boys than girls. The results are discussed with reference to older adults’ beneficial role of supporting their offspring.

Keywords

Children Grandparents Injuries Millennium Cohort Study Three-generational households 

References

  1. Albertini, M., Kohli, M., & Vogel, C. (2007). Intergenerational transfers of time and money in European families: common patterns – different regimes? Journal of European Social Policy, 17, 319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aquilino, W. S. (1996). The lifecourse of children born to unmarried mothers: childhood living arrangements and young adult outcomes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruce, B. S., Lake, J. P., Eden, V. A., & Denney, J. C. (2004). Children at risk of injury. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 19, 121–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coall, D. A., & Hertwig, R. (2010). Grandparental investment: Past, present, and future. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coall, D. A., & Hertwig, R. (2011). Grandparental investment: a relic of the past or a resource for the future? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 93–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DeLeire, T., & Kalil, A. (2002). Good things come in 3 s: Mutigenerational coresidence and adolescent adjustment. Demography, 39, 393–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunifon, R. (2013). The influence of grandparents in the lives of children and adolescents. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 55–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunifon, R., & Kowaleski-Jones, L. (2007). The influence of grandparents in single-mother families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 465–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dunifon, R., Ziol-Guest, K. M., & Kopko, K. (2014). Grandparent coresidence and family well-being: implications for research and policy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 125, 110–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hank, K., & Buber, I. (2009). Grandparents caring for their grandchildren: findings from the 2004 survey of health, ageing, and retirement in Europe. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hansen, K. (Ed.). (2010). Millennium Cohort Study first, second, third and fourth surveys: A guide to the datasets (5th ed.). London: Centre for Longitudinal Studies.Google Scholar
  12. Hong, J., Lee, B., Ha, E. H., & Park, H. (2009). Parental socioeconomic status and unintentional injury deaths in early childhood: Consideration of injury mechanisms, age at death, and gender. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42, 313–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Igel, C., & Szydlik, M. (2011). Grandchild care and welfare state arrangements in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 21, 210–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kendrick, D., & Marsh, P. (2001). How useful are sociodemographic characteristics in identifying children at risk of unintentional injury? Public Health, 115, 103–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kendrick, D., Mulvaney, C., Burton, P., & Watson, M. (2005). Relationships between child, family and neighborhood characteristics and childhood injury: a cohort study. Social Science and Medicine, 61, 1905–1915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kreidl, M., & Hubatkova, B. (2014). Does coresidence with grandparents reduce the negative association between sibship size and reading test scores? evidence from 40 countries. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 38, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lahdenperä, M., Lummaa, V., Helle, S., Tremblay, M., & Russell, A. F. (2004). Fitness benefits of prolonged post-reproductive lifespan in women. Nature, 428, 178–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lussier, G., Deater-Deckard, K., Dunn, J., & Davies, L. (2002). Support across two generations: children’s closeness to grandparents following parental divorce and remarriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 363–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mare, R. D. (2011). A multigenerational view of inequality. Demography, 48, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McLanahan, S., & Sandefur, G. (1994). Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Mollborn, S., Fomby, P., & Dennis, J. (2011). Who matters for children’s early development? race/ethnicity and extended household structures in the United States. Child Indicators Research, 4, 389–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mutchler, J. E., & Baker, L. A. (2009). The implications of grandparent coresidence for economic hardship among children in mother-only families. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 1576–1597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Myhre, M. C., Thoresen, S., Grøgaard, J. B., & Dyb, G. (2012). Familial factors and child characteristics as predictors of injuries in toddlers: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open, 2, e000740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. OECD. (2014). Family database. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  25. Pearce, A., Li, L., Abbas, J., Ferguson, B., Graham, H., Law, C., & the Millennium Cohort Study Child Health Group. (2010). Does childcare influence socioeconomic inequalities in unintentional injury? findings from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 64, 161e166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pearce, A., Li, L., Abbas, J., Ferguson, B., Graham, H., & Law, C. (2012). Does the home environment influence inequalities in unintentional injury in early childhood? findings from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 66, 181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pilkauskas, N. V., & Martinson, M. L. (2014). Three-generation family households in early childhood: comparisons between the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Demographic Research, 30, 1639–1652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reading, R., Jones, A., Haynes, R., Daras, K., & Emond, A. (2008). Individual factors explain neighbourhood variations in accidents to children under 5 years of age. Social Science and Medicine, 67, 915–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ruggles, S. (2003). Multigenerational families in nineteenth-century America. Continuity and Change, 18, 139–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sear, R., & Coall, D. A. (2011). How much does family matter? cooperative breeding and the demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 37, 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sear, R., & Mace, R. (2008). Who keeps children alive? a review of the effects of kin on child survival. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tanskanen, A. O., & Danielsbacka, M. (2012). Beneficial effects of grandparental involvement vary by lineage in the UK. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 985–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tanskanen, A. O., & Danielsbacka, M. (2016). Maternal grandfathers and child development in England. In A. Buchanan & A. Rotkirch (Eds.), Grandfathers: International perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  34. Tanskanen, A.O., Danielsbacka, M. & Rotkirch, A. (2015). More Injuries in Half Sibling than Full Sibling Households in the UK. Journal of Individual Differences 36, DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000171.
  35. Unicef. (2007). An overview of child well-being in rich countries: A comprehensive assessment of the lives and well-being of children and adolescents in the economically advanced nations. Florence: The United Nations Children’s Fund.Google Scholar
  36. WHO. (2008). World report on child injury prevention. Geneva: The World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TurkuTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations