Child Indicators Research

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 1077–1093 | Cite as

Assessing Spatial and Temporal Differences in State-Level Child Well-Being Based on Tests of Statistical Significance

  • Sarah E. PattersonEmail author
  • William P. O’Hare


The concept of child well-being is central to the study of children and is reflected in data books, statistical indices, and report cards. Statistical indicators of child well-being are increasingly used to examine the quality of life for children. Such reports are often used to examine differences across geographic areas (spatial differences) and changes over time (temporal differences). In this study, indicators from a widely used report on child well-being are used to compare spatial differences and temporal differences among states in the U.S. based on tests of statistical significance. Results show that currently available indicators are better at detecting differences in child well-being between states at one point in time rather than state-level changes over time. Additionally, a state index of child well-being is constructed using statistically significant differences from the national data; the results of the new index proved to be similar to the more traditional z-score method.


Child well-being Indicators Indices Scores or rankings 


  1. Ben-Arieh, A. (2006). Measuring and monitoring the well-being of young children around the world. Paper Commissioned for the EFA Global Monitoring Report 2007, Strong Foundations: Early Childhood Care and Education.Google Scholar
  2. Ben-Arieh, A., Casas, F., Frones, I., & Korbin, J. (Editors) (2015). Handbook of child well-being. Dordrecht: Springer Publisher.Google Scholar
  3. Bradshaw, J., & Richardson, D. (2009). An index of child well-being in Europe. Child Indicators Research, 2(3), 319–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradshaw, J., Noble, M., Bloor, K., Huby, M., McLennan, D., Rhodes, D., Sinclair, I., & Wilkinson, K. (2009). A child well-being index at small area level in England. Child Indictors Research, 2(2), 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (2014). National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH): summary of methodological studies, 1971–2014. Rockville: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Retrieved from
  6. Child Trends. (2002). Public understanding of standard errors: a report to the KIDS COUNT project of the Annie E. Casey Foundation. Washington: Child Trends.Google Scholar
  7. Children’s Defense Fund. (2014). The State of America’s Children: 2014. Retrieved from: Accessed 15 Nov 2014.
  8. Children’s Rights Council. (1998). Children’s rights council: top ten states to raise a child. Washington: Children’s Rights Council.Google Scholar
  9. Every Child Matters Education Fund. (2008). Geography matters: child well-being in the states. Washington: Every Child Matters Fund.Google Scholar
  10. Fernandes, L., Mendes, A., & Teixeira, A. A. C. (2012). A review essay on the measurement of child well-being. Social Indicators Research, 106, 239–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foundation for Child Development. (2013). 2010 child and youth well-being index (CWI). New York: Foundation for Child Development.Google Scholar
  12. Heron, M., Hoyert, D.L., Murphy, S.L., Xu, J., Kochanek, K.D., & Tejadada-Vera, B. (2009). Deaths: Final Data for 2006. Retrieved from
  13. Hur, Y., & Testerman, R. (2012). An index of child well-being at the local level in the U.S.: the case of North Carolina Counties. Child Indicator Research, 5(1), 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lamb, V.L., & Land, K.C. (2013). Methodologies used in the construction of composite child well-being indices. In A. Ben-Arieh, F. Casas, I. Frones, J. Korbin (Ed.), Handbook of child well-being, Springer Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Lamb, V. L., & O’Hare, W. P. (2013). Scalability of the CWI: state-level indicators and composite indices. Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research, 6, 161–187.Google Scholar
  16. La Red por Los Derechos de la Infancia en Mexico. (2013). La Infancia Cuenta en Mexico, 2010: Libro de Datos. Mexico City.Google Scholar
  17. Lau, M., & Bradshaw, J. (2010). Child well-being on the pacific Rim. Child Indicators Research, 3(3), 374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee, J. K., Lamb, V. L., & Land, K. C. (2009). Composite indices of changes in child and youth well-being in the San Francisco Bay area and the State of California, 1995–2005. Child Indicator Research, 2(4), 353–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee, B. J., Kim, S. S., Ahn, J. J., & Yoo, J. (2013). What does composite well-being index of children tell us about Korean children’s quality of life? Seoul: Save the Children Korea and Institute of Social Welfare, Seoul National University.Google Scholar
  20. Mather, M., & Dupuis, G. (2012). The new KIDS COUNT index. Baltimore: The Annie E. Casey Foundation. Retrieved from
  21. Moore, K. A., Theokas, C., Lippman, L., Bloch, M., Vandivere, S., & O’Hare, W. P. (2008). A microdata child well-being index: conceptualization, creation, and findings. Child Indicator Research, 1(1), 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moore, K.A., Murphey, D., Bandy, T., & Lawner, E. (2014). Indices of child well-being and developmental contexts. In Handbook of child well-being, Springer Netherlands (pp. 2807–2822).Google Scholar
  23. National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). NAEP Technical Documentation. Retrieved from
  24. National Center for Health Statistics. (1994). Vital statistics of the United States: 1994 mortality, technical appendix. Washington: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
  25. National Science Board (2004). Public Knowledge about Science and Technology. In Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Understanding. Retrieved from
  26. O’Hare, W. P. (2006). Developing state indices of child well-being. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  27. O’Hare, W. P. (2012). Use of domains in indices of child well-being. Heidelberg: Presentation at International Society for Child Indicators Board Meeting.Google Scholar
  28. O’Hare, W. P. (2013). A case study of data-based child advocacy: the KIDS COUNT project. Child Indicators Research, 6(1), 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. O’Hare, W. P. (2014a). data-based child advocacy: using statistical indicators to improve the lives of children, Springer.Google Scholar
  30. O’Hare, W. P. (2014b). A research note on statistical methods used to create indices of child well-being. Child Indictors Research. doi: 10.1007/s12187-014-9244-8.Google Scholar
  31. O’Hare, W. P., & Gutierrez, F. (2012). The use of domains in constructing a comprehensive composite index of child well-being. Child Indicators Research, 5(4), 609–629.Google Scholar
  32. O’Hare, W. P., & Lamb, V. L. (2004). Ranking states based on improvement in child well-being during the 1990s, KIDS COUNT working paper. Baltimore: The Annie E. Casey Foundation.Google Scholar
  33. O’Hare, W. P., & Lamb, V. L. (2009). Ranking states on improvement in child well-being since 2000, KIDS COUNT working paper. Baltimore: the Annie E. Casey Foundation. Retrieved from
  34. O’Hare, W. P., Mather, M., Dupuis, G., Land, K. C., Fu, Q., & Lamb, V. L. (2013). Analyzing differences in child well-being among U.S. States. Child Indicators Research, 6(2), 401–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
  36. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2009). Doing better for children, 2009, chapter 2. Paris: Comparative Child Well-Being Across the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
  37. Pollard, E. I., & Lee, P. D. (2002). Child well-being: a systematic review of the literature. Social Science Indicators Research, 61, 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Richardson, D., Hoelscher, P., & Bradshaw, J. (2008). Child well-being in Central and Eastern European Countries (CEE) and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). Child Indicator Research, 1(3), 211–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2014). Results from the 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings. NSDUH Series H-48, HHS Publication No. (SMA) 14-4863. Rockville.Google Scholar
  40. The Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2006). KIDS COUNT data book 2006, state trends in child well-being. Baltimore: The Annie E. Casey Foundation. Retrieved from
  41. The Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2014). KIDS COUNT data book 2014, state trends in child well-being. Baltimore: The Annie E Casey Foundation. Retrieved from
  42. UNICEF Innocenti Research Center. (2013). Child well-being in rich countries: a comparative overview, Report Card 11, Innocenti Research Centre, Florence.Google Scholar
  43. UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre. (2007). Child poverty in perspective: an overview of child well-being in rich countries a comprehensive assessment of the lives and well-being of children and adolescents in the economically advanced nations, UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Report Card 7, Florence.Google Scholar
  44. UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre. (2010). The Children left behind: league table of inequality in child well-being in the worlds rich countries, UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Report Card 9, Florence ItalyGoogle Scholar
  45. U.S. Census Bureau. (2014). Methodology for the United States Population Estimates: Vintage 2014. Retrieved from
  46. U.S. Department of Health and Human Resources. (2005). The health and well-being of children: a portrait of the states and nation; 2005. Washington: Health and Resources and Services Administration.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pennsylvania State UniversityState CollegeUSA
  2. 2.O’Hare Data and Demographic Services LLCCape CharlesUSA

Personalised recommendations