Advertisement

Child Indicators Research

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 471–484 | Cite as

Validity and Reliability of a Brief Symptom Checklist to Measure Psychological Health in School-Aged Children

  • Genevieve Gariepy
  • Britt McKinnon
  • Mariane Sentenac
  • Frank J. Elgar
Article

Abstract

The psychological health of children is a global health concern. The international Health Behavior in School-Aged Children (HBSC) study has surveyed the psychological health of youths in over 40 countries. The HBSC questionnaire includes a brief symptom checklist of psychological complaints, but it has not yet been validated. This study evaluated the construct validity of the psychological health self-report tool used in the HBSC study. We used data from 26,078 participants in the 2010 Canadian HBSC survey. The core HBSC questionnaire measured common psychosomatic complaints using the HBSC symptom checklist (HBSC-SCL). The Canadian survey included an additional series of questions that measure four dimensions of mental health (emotional problems, emotional well-being, behavioral problems, prosocial behavior). We used these items to evaluate the construct validity of psychological symptoms in the HBSC-SCL. We assessed internal construct validity using Cronbach’s alpha and external construct validity using factor analysis and structural equation modelling. Factor analysis showed that the HBSC-SCL measures two factors, psychological and somatic complaints. Psychological complaints included feeling low/depressed, irritable/bad tempered, nervous, and difficulties sleeping. Internal validity of the psychological subscale was good (α = 0.78). This 4-item subscale demonstrated convergent validity with indicators for emotional problems (correlation (r) = −0.79, p < 0.001) and emotional well-being (r = 0.48, p < 0.001), and discriminant validity with indicators for behavioral problems (r = −0.17, p < 0.001) and prosocial behavior (r = 0.02, p < 0.001). Results support the HBSC-SCL psychological subscale as a valid measure of psychological health in school-aged children. Future research is recommended to replicate findings in other youth populations.

Keywords

Child Adolescent Mental health Epidemiologic measurements Validity and reliability Health survey Emotional health 

Abbreviations

α

Cronbach’s alpha

β

Regression coefficient

CD

Coefficient of determination

CFI

Comparative fit index

HBSC

Health behavior in school-aged children

HBSC-SCL

Health behavior in school-aged children symptom checklist

r

Pearson correlation coefficient

RMSEA

Root mean square error of approximation

SEM

Structural equation modelling

SMRM

Standardized root mean square residual

TLI

Tucker–Lewis index

WHO

World health organization

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by funding provided by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research. The Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study is a WHO/Euro collaborative study and funded by public sources in each member country. The Health Behaviour in School-aged Children International Coordinating Centre is located at St Andrew’s University, and the databank is managed at the University of Bergen. The Canadian HBSC study (Principal Investigators: John Freeman, William Pickett; National Coordinator: Matthew King) was funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada, with additional support from Health Canada.

Supplementary material

12187_2015_9326_MOESM1_ESM.docx (53 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 53 kb)

References

  1. Boyce, W. F., Davies, D., Raman, S. R., Tynjala, J., Valimaa, R., King, M., et al. (2009). Emotional health of Canadian and Finnish students with disabilities or chronic conditions. [Article]. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 32(2), 154–161. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e32831e452e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Currie CE, G. R., Theunissen, A., Molcho, M., Samdal, O., & Dur, W. (2010). Health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) study protocol: Background, methodology and mandatory items for the 2009/10 survey. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  3. Damsgaard, M. T., Holstein, B. E., Koushede, V., Madsen, K. R., Meilstrup, C., Nelausen, M. K., et al. (2014). Close relations to parents and emotional symptoms among adolescents: beyond socio-economic impact? [Article]. International Journal of Public Health, 59(5), 721–726. doi: 10.1007/s00038-014-0600-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de Matos, M. G., Barrett, P., Dadds, M., & Shortt, A. (2003). Anxiety, depression, and peer relationships during adolescence: results from the Portuguese national health behaviour in school-aged children survey. [Article]. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 18(1), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elgar, F. J., Craig, W., & Trites, S. J. (2013). Family dinners, communication, and mental health in Canadian adolescents. [Article]. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(4), 433–438. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.07.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferrari, A. J., Charlson, F. J., Norman, R. E., Patten, S. B., Freedman, G., Murray, C. J. L., et al. (2013). Burden of depressive disorders by country, sex, age, and year: findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. PLoS Medicine, 10(11), e1001547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Freeman, J. G., King, M., Pickett, W., Craig, W., Elgar, F., Janssen, I., et al. (2012). The health of Canada’s young people: A mental health focus (pp. 11–28). Ottawa: Health Canada.Google Scholar
  8. Haugland, S., & Wold, B. (2001). Subjective health complaints in adolescence - reliability and validity of survey methods. [Article]. Journal of Adolescence, 24(5), 611–624. doi: 10.1006/jado.2000.0393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haugland, S., Wold, B., Stevenson, J., Aaroe, L. E., & Woynarowska, B. (2001). Subjective health complaints in adolescence - a cross-national comparison of prevalence and dimensionality. [Article]. European Journal of Public Health, 11(1), 4–10. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/11.1.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Herve, M. C. (2000). CORTESTI: stata module to test equality of two correlation coefficients. (S407302 ed.): Boston College Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  11. Hetland, J., Torsheim, T., & Aaro, L. E. (2002). Subjective health complaints in adolescence: dimensional structure and variation across gender and age. [Article]. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 30(3), 223–230. doi: 10.1080/140349402320290953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R., & Walters, E. E. (2005). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions’ of DSM-IV disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication. [Article]. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(6), 593–602. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Merikangas, K. R., Nakamura, E. F., & Kessler, R. C. (2009). Epidemiology of mental disorders in children and adolescents. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 11(1), 7–20.Google Scholar
  15. Murray, C. J., Vos, T., Lozano, R., Naghavi, M., Flaxman, A. D., Michaud, C., et al. (2012). Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet, 380(9859), 2197–2223. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61689-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pickett, W., King, M., & Freeman, J. G. (2012). The health of Canada’s young people: A mental health focus (pp. 1–10). Ottawa: Health Canada.Google Scholar
  17. Ravens-Sieberer, U., Gosch, A., Rajmil, L., Erhart, M., Bruil, J., Power, M., et al. (2008). The KIDSCREEN-52 quality of life measure for children and adolescents: psychometric results from a cross-cultural survey in 13 European countries. [Article]. Value in Health, 11(4), 645–658. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00291.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ravens-Sieberer, U., Erhart, M., Rajmil, L., Herdman, M., Auquier, P., Bruil, J., et al. (2010). Reliability, construct and criterion validity of the KIDSCREEN-10 score: a short measure for children and adolescents’ well-being and health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 19(10), 1487–1500. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9706-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. World Health Organization (2012). Adolescent mental health: mapping actions of nongovernmental organizations and other international development organizations.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Health and Social PolicyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Douglas Mental Health University InstituteMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations