Advertisement

Child Indicators Research

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 623–640 | Cite as

Make the Promise True: a Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for Measuring Quality in Child Protection Service Delivery in Zimbabwe

  • Elayn SammonEmail author
  • Michelle Godwin
  • Lauren Rumble
  • Anthony Nolan
  • Abel Blessing Matsika
  • Nyasha Mayanga
Article

Abstract

Promising Quality: making sure that we deliver excellent services for children, (UNICEF 2012a), is an innovative monitoring and evaluation framework of original and standardised measures developed in Zimbabwe to support child protection providers to deliver quality services for children within a multi-agency child protection system. It is intended to meet the demands of governments, donors and other stakeholders for information on the effectiveness and efficiency of development programming but importantly is a practice which ensures downward accountability to children. It can also be utilised to track programme performance, and in broad terms, value for money in child protection service delivery. Further, Promising Quality has important implications for the creation and strengthening of different types of social capital between children, organisations and government. Promising Quality is constructed to encourage children’s full and meaningful participation in the monitoring and evaluation (M&E) process; it poses three questions and uses four specifically designed instruments to find out if an organization is delivering what children need where and when they need it. In so doing, gaps in the functioning of a comprehensive child protection system are highlighted such that improvements in programming, policy advocacy and investment can be made. This paper argues that Promising Quality - its inception and continuing evolution - is a core component of a rights-based, participatory national child protection system in developing contexts and beyond because of its ability to track gains in efficiency as well as child protection outcomes.

Keywords

Child protection systems Monitoring and evaluation Child participation Accountability Value for money Social capital 

References

  1. Ager, A., Akesson, B., Schunk, K. (2010). Mapping of Child Protection M&E Tools: Final report to UNICEF. http://www.cpmerg.org/publications/ [Accessed 28 March 2014].
  2. Anand, S, Desmond, C., Habtamu, F., Marques, N. (2012). The Cost of Inaction: Case Studies from Rwanda and Angola. FXB Center for Health and Human rights. Harvard University.Google Scholar
  3. Appleyard, K., Egeland, B., Van Dulmen, M., & Sroufe, L. (2005). When more is not better: the role of cumulative risk in child behavior outcomes. Journal Of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 46(3), 235–245. Academic Search Complete, EBSCOhost, viewed 27 March 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashley, S., Ayliffe, T. and Chiroro, P. (2013). Child Protection Fund (CPF): Mid-Term Review 2013 - Final report. The IDL Group: Bristol.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, A., & Sabo, K. (2004). Participatory evaluation essentials: A guide for non-profit organizations and their evaluation partners. Cambridge: The Bruner Foundation. http://www.healthincommon.ca/wp-content/uploads/participatory-evaluation-essentials-for-non-profit-organizations-and-their-evaluation-partners.pdf [Accessed 18 March 2014].Google Scholar
  6. Bamberger, M. and Segone M. (2011). How to design and manage Equity-focused evaluations, Evaluation Working Paper, Issue No. 6, UNICEF, New York. http://www.pol.ulaval.ca/perfeval/upload/publication_319.pdf [Accessed 20 March 2014].
  7. Christian Aid. (2012). Value for Money; How Christian Aid Assesses Value for Money in its Programmes. Christian Aid: London. http://www.christianaid.org.uk/images/value-for-money.pdf [accessed 30 March 2014].
  8. Department for International Development. (2011). DFID’s Approach to Value for Money (VfM). Available at: https://www.gov.uk/Government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/67479/DFID-approach-value-money.pdf [Accessed 23 March 2014].
  9. Department of Health Social Services and Public Safety. (2008). Standards for Child Protection Services: DHSSPSNI: Belfast. Available at: http://www.dhsspsni.gov.uk/standards_for_child_protection_services-2.pdf [Accessed 23 March 2014].
  10. Development Assistance Committee. (1991). Principles for Evaluation of Development Assistance. OECD: Paris. http://www.oecd.org/dac/evaluation/50584880.pdf [Accessed 15 February 2014].
  11. Ebrahim, A. (2002). Information struggles: the role of information in the reproduction of NGO-funder Relationships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(1), 84–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fafchamps, M. (2006). Development and social capital. The Journal of Development Studies, 42(7), 1180–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fennema, M., & Tillie, J. (2008). Social capital in multicultural societies. In D. Castiglione, J. W. Van Deth, & G. Wolleb (Eds.), The handbook of social capital (pp. 349–370). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Ghorkmazayan, M. and Stuckenbruck, D. (2013). Measuring the hard to measure: Global child protection indicators. Paper presented at the International Society for Child Indicators Conference, Seoul, South Korea. 30 May.Google Scholar
  15. Godwin, M. and Matsika, A.B... (2013). Independent Assessment of Specialized Child Protection Services, Final Report, August 2013. UNICEF Zimbabwe. Harare, Zimbabwe. http://www.unicef.org/zimbabwe/resources_13607.html [Accessed 26 March 2014].
  16. Jackson, P. (2012). Value for money and international development: Deconstructing myths to promote a more constructive discussion. The OECD Development Assistance Committee. Available at http://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/49652541.pdf [Accessed 2 April 2014].Google Scholar
  17. James Bell Associates. (2009). Evaluation Brief: Critical Issues in Evaluating Child Welfare Programmes. Children’s Bureau, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/resource/evaluating-child-welfare-programs [Accessed 07 July 2014].
  18. Kandawasvikaa, G. Q., Kuonaa, P., Chandiwanab, P., Masanganiseb, M., Gumboa, F. Z., Mapingureb, M. P., Nathooa, K., & Stray-Pedersencd, B. (2013). The burden and predictors of cognitive impairment among 6- to 8-year-old children infected and uninfected with HIV from Harare, Zimbabwe. A cross-sectional study Child Neuropsychology: A Journal on Normal and Abnormal Development in Childhood and Adolescence. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2013.876493.Google Scholar
  19. Malley, J., & Fernández, J.-L. (2010). Measuring quality in social care services: theory and practice. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 81(4), 559–582. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8292.2010.00422.x. ISSN 1370–4788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Matsika, A. B., Nyikahadzoi, K., Chikwaiwa, B., Banda, G., & Muchinako, G. A. (2013). An evaluation of the tool for measuring psychosocial well-being of children. Schools of social work in Zimbabwe in collaboration with council of social workers. Harare: University of Zimbabwe.Google Scholar
  21. Ministry of Labour and Social Services (MoLSS). (2010). National child participation and protection guidelines. Harare: Ministry of Labour and Social Services. Available at: http://www.unicef.org/zimbabwe/resources_14484.html [Accessed 26 March 2014].Google Scholar
  22. Morgan, J. (ed.) (2009). Mainstreaming Psychosocial Care and Support through Child Participation: For programmes working with children and families affected by HIV and AIDS, poverty and conflict. REPSSI: Johannesburg. http://www.repssi.org/download/REPSSI%20Manuals%20and%20Tools(2)/_child_participation_web.pdf [Accessed 24 March 2014].
  23. Munro, E. (2011). The Munro review of child protection: Final report - a child-centred system. London: Department for Education. https://www.gov.uk/Government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/175391/Munro-Review.pdf [Accessed 24 March 2014].Google Scholar
  24. O’Donnell, K. Nyangara, F. Murphy, R. Cannon, M. and Nyberg, B. (2008). Child Status Index Manual. PEPFAR, USAID, MEASURE Evaluation. http://www.cpc.unc.edu/measure/publications/ms-08-31a [Accessed 28 March 2014].
  25. Poortinga, W. (2006). Social relations or social capital? Individual and community health effects of bonding social capital. Social Science and Medicine, 63(2006), 255–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  28. Raiser, M. (2008). Social capital in transition economies. In D. Castiglione, J. W. Van Deth, & G. Wolleb (Eds.), The handbook of social capital (pp. 491–519). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Sabatini, F. (2009). Social capital as social networks: a new framework for measurement and an empirical analysis of its determinants and consequences. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(2009), 429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sera, Y. and Beaudry, S. (2007). Monitoring & Evaluation: Tips for Strengthening Organizational Capacity. World Bank Small Grants Programme Briefing Note: World Bank 2007. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTBELARUS/Resources/M&E.pdf [Accessed 27 March 2014]
  31. Southern African Development Community (SADC). (2011). “Minimum Package of Services for Orphans and Other Vulnerable Children and Youth”. http://www.sadc.int/files/6313/5293/3502/SADC_Minimum_Package_of_Services_for_OVCY_-Final_Printed.pdf [Accessed 28 March 2014].
  32. Taylor, S., & Chisvo, M. (2010). Programme of support for the national action plan for orphans and vulnerable children - outcome assessment - final report. Harare: UNICEF Zimbabwe.Google Scholar
  33. Tilbury, C. (2006). Accountability via performance measurement: the case of child protection services. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 65, 48–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8500.2006.00493a.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 44/25 of 20 November 1989 entry into force 2 September 1990, in accordance with article 49 Available at: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/crc.pdf [Accessed 2 April 2014].
  35. United Nations Children’s Fund. (2010). A situational analysis on the status of Women’s and Children’s rights in Zimbabwe, 2005 – 2010: A call for reducing disparities and improving equity. Harare: UNICEF Zimbabwe. http://www.unicef.org/zimbabwe/resources_12788.html [Accessed 28 March 2014].Google Scholar
  36. United Nations Children’s Fund (2012) Measuring and Monitoring Child Protection Systems: Proposed Core Indicators for the East Asia and Pacific Region, Strengthening Child Protection Series No. 3., UNICEF EAPRO, Bangkok, 2012 ISBN: 978-974-685-137-4Google Scholar
  37. United Nations Children’s Fund. (2012a). Promising quality: Making sure that we deliver excellent services to children – monitoring and evaluating quality in child protection. Harare: UNICEF Zimbabwe. http://www.unicef.org/zimbabwe/resources_13606.html [Accessed 27 March 2914].Google Scholar
  38. United Nations Children’s Fund. (2012b). Measuring and monitoring child protection systems: Proposed core indicators for the east Asia and pacific region, strengthening child protection series No. 3. Bangkok: UNICEF EAPRO.Google Scholar
  39. United Nations Children’s Fund, CCORE, National AIDS Council & Ministry of Labour and Social Services. (2011). My life Now: An analysis of outcome data. Harare: UNICEF, CCORE, National AIDS Council & Ministry of Labour and Social Services.Google Scholar
  40. Willis, N., L. Frewin, A. Miller, C. Dziea, W. Mavhu and F. Cowan (2014 forthcoming). “My Story” – HIV positive adolescents tell their story through film. Children and Youth Services Review. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.03.029
  41. Wright, P., Turner, C., Clay, D., & Mills, H. (2003). The participation of children and young people in developing social care. Participation practice guide 06. London: SCIE. http://www.scie.org.uk/publications/guides/guide11/files/guide11.pdf [Accessed 28 March 2014].Google Scholar
  42. Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency (ZIMSTAT) and ICF International. (2012). Zimbabwe Demographic and Health Survey 2010–11. Calverton, Maryland: ZIMSTAT and ICF International Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elayn Sammon
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michelle Godwin
    • 2
  • Lauren Rumble
    • 3
  • Anthony Nolan
    • 1
  • Abel Blessing Matsika
    • 4
  • Nyasha Mayanga
    • 5
  1. 1.UNICEF ZimbabweBelgraviaZimbabwe
  2. 2.KirribilliAustralia
  3. 3.UNICEF JakartaJakartaIndonesia
  4. 4.School of Social Work, University of ZimbabweHarareZimbabwe
  5. 5.Poverty, Vulnerability and Wealth Creation UK Department for International Development (DFID)HarareZimbabwe

Personalised recommendations