An Analysis of Reunification from Out-of-Home Care in Three Australian States
- 490 Downloads
The aim of this study was to examine the nature and predictors of family reunification patterns across three jurisdictions in Australia. A sample of 1,337 children were sampled from three Australian States if they had entered care for a period of at least 7 days between January 1st 2006 and December 2007. Administrative data were collected using a consistent sample frame (until the end of 2009) and using a standardised data collection protocol. The results confirmed the findings of previous studies by showing that 80 % of reunification typically occur within the first year after entry into care and that factors relating to poverty as well as abuse, rejection and abandonment emerged as the most consistent risk factors associated with a reduced likelihood of reunification. Some differences between the States were observed and these were attributed to differences in the availability of kinship care and in legislation relating to the timing of long-term placement decisions. The findings are discussed in relation to the challenges associated with studying multiple clustered risk factors as well as the need for nationally consistent data collection systems that enable nationally comparative child welfare data to be collected on a regular basis.
KeywordsReunification Out-of-home care Australia Policy
This project was supported by ARC Linkage grant LP0989371. Funding for the research was provided by the Australian Research Council and contributions from the Department of Health and Human Services Tasmania, Victorian Department of Human Services, South Australian Department for Families and Communities, Queensland Department of Child Safety, ACT Department of Disability and Housing Service, NSW Department of Community Services, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs.
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). (2011). Child protection Australia 2009–10. Canberra: AIHW.Google Scholar
- Cashmore, J., & Paxman, M. (1996). Wards leaving care: A longitudinal study. Kensington: Social Policy Research Unit, University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
- Courtney, M. E. (1996). Comparing the timing of exits from substitute care. Children and Youth Services Review, 18, 307–334. doi: 10.1016/0190-7409(96)00008-4.
- Davis, E. W. (1979). Long-term vs. short-term placement of children in foster care: the development of a predictive instrument. Dissertation Abstracts International, 39, 5147.Google Scholar
- Delfabbro, P. H., Barber, J. G., & Cooper, L. L. (2003). Predictors of short-term reunification in South Australian substitute care. Child Welfare, 82, 27–51.Google Scholar
- Delfabbro, P. H., Borgas, M., Jeffereys, H., Rogers, N., & Wilson, R. (2008). Children with multiple care and protection orders: Placement history, decision-making and psychosocial outcomes. Adelaide: Department for Families and Communities.Google Scholar
- Delfabbro, P. H., Borgas, M., Rogers, N., Jeffreys, H., & Wilson, R. (2009). The social and family backgrounds of infants in care and their capacity to predict subsequent abuse notifications: a study of South Australian out-of-home care 2000–2005. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Delfabbro, P. H., Fernandez, E., McCormick, J., & Kettler, L. (2013). Reunification in a complete entry cohort: a longitudinal study of children entering out-of-home care in Tasmania, Australia. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 1592–1600.Google Scholar
- Fanshel, D., & Shinn, E. B. (1978). Children in foster care: A longitudinal study. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Farmer, E., & Parker, R. (1991). Trials and tribulations: Returning children from local authority care to their families. London: Department of Health, HMSO.Google Scholar
- Fernandez, E. A. (1996). Significant harm: Unravelling child protection decisions and substitute care careers of children. Avebury: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
- Guo, S. & Wells, K. (2003). Research on timing of foster care outcomes: one methodological problem and approaches to its solution. Social Service Review, 77, 1–24.Google Scholar
- Karoll, B. R., & Poertner, J. (2003). Indicators for safe family reunification: how professionals differ. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 3, 139–160.Google Scholar
- Maas, H., & Engler, R. (1959). Children in need of parents. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Maluccio, A. N., Fein, E., & Davis, I. P. (1994). Family reunification: research findings, issues, and directions. Child Welfare, 5, 489–504.Google Scholar
- Zeller, D. E., & Gamble, T. J. (2007). Improving child welfare performance: retrospective and prospective approaches. Child Welfare, 86, 97–122.Google Scholar