Child Indicators Research

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 359–373 | Cite as

An Analysis of Reunification from Out-of-Home Care in Three Australian States

  • Paul Delfabbro
  • Elizabeth Fernandez
  • Jessica McCormick
  • Lisa Ketter


The aim of this study was to examine the nature and predictors of family reunification patterns across three jurisdictions in Australia. A sample of 1,337 children were sampled from three Australian States if they had entered care for a period of at least 7 days between January 1st 2006 and December 2007. Administrative data were collected using a consistent sample frame (until the end of 2009) and using a standardised data collection protocol. The results confirmed the findings of previous studies by showing that 80 % of reunification typically occur within the first year after entry into care and that factors relating to poverty as well as abuse, rejection and abandonment emerged as the most consistent risk factors associated with a reduced likelihood of reunification. Some differences between the States were observed and these were attributed to differences in the availability of kinship care and in legislation relating to the timing of long-term placement decisions. The findings are discussed in relation to the challenges associated with studying multiple clustered risk factors as well as the need for nationally consistent data collection systems that enable nationally comparative child welfare data to be collected on a regular basis.


Reunification Out-of-home care Australia Policy 



This project was supported by ARC Linkage grant LP0989371. Funding for the research was provided by the Australian Research Council and contributions from the Department of Health and Human Services Tasmania, Victorian Department of Human Services, South Australian Department for Families and Communities, Queensland Department of Child Safety, ACT Department of Disability and Housing Service, NSW Department of Community Services, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs.


  1. Akin, B. A. (2011). Predictors of foster care exits to permanency: a competing risks analysis of reunification, guardianship and adoption. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 999–1011. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.01.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). (2011). Child protection Australia 2009–10. Canberra: AIHW.Google Scholar
  3. Barber, J. G., & Delfabbro, P. H. (2004). Children in foster care. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cashmore, J., & Paxman, M. (1996). Wards leaving care: A longitudinal study. Kensington: Social Policy Research Unit, University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
  5. Cheng, T. C. (2010). Factors associated with reunification: a longitudinal analysis of long-term foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 1311–1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Choi, S., & Ryan, J. P. (2007). Co-occurring problems for substance abusing mothers in child welfare: matching services to improve family reunification. Children and Youth Services Review, 29, 1395–1410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Connell, C. M., Katz, K. H., Saunders, L., & Tebes, J. K. (2006). Leaving foster care- the influence of child and case characteristics on foster care exit rates. Children and Youth Services Review, 28, 780–798. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.08.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Courtney, M. E. (1994). Factors associated with the reunification of foster children with their families. Social Service Review, 68, 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Courtney, M. E. (1996). Comparing the timing of exits from substitute care. Children and Youth Services Review, 18, 307–334. doi: 10.1016/0190-7409(96)00008-4.
  10. Courtney, M. E., & Wong, Y.-L. (1996). Comparing the timing of exits from substitute care. Children and Youth Services Review, 18, 307–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis, E. W. (1979). Long-term vs. short-term placement of children in foster care: the development of a predictive instrument. Dissertation Abstracts International, 39, 5147.Google Scholar
  12. Delfabbro, P. H., Barber, J. G., & Cooper, L. L. (2003). Predictors of short-term reunification in South Australian substitute care. Child Welfare, 82, 27–51.Google Scholar
  13. Delfabbro, P. H., Borgas, M., Jeffereys, H., Rogers, N., & Wilson, R. (2008). Children with multiple care and protection orders: Placement history, decision-making and psychosocial outcomes. Adelaide: Department for Families and Communities.Google Scholar
  14. Delfabbro, P. H., Borgas, M., Rogers, N., Jeffreys, H., & Wilson, R. (2009). The social and family backgrounds of infants in care and their capacity to predict subsequent abuse notifications: a study of South Australian out-of-home care 2000–2005. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Delfabbro, P. H., Fernandez, E., McCormick, J., & Kettler, L. (2013). Reunification in a complete entry cohort: a longitudinal study of children entering out-of-home care in Tasmania, Australia. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 1592–1600.Google Scholar
  16. Delfabbro, P. H., Hirte, C., Rogers, N., & Wilson, R. (2010). The over-representation of young indigenous people in the South Australian child system: a longitudinal analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 1418–1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fanshel, D., & Shinn, E. B. (1978). Children in foster care: A longitudinal study. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Farmer, E., & Parker, R. (1991). Trials and tribulations: Returning children from local authority care to their families. London: Department of Health, HMSO.Google Scholar
  19. Farmer, E. M. Z., Southerland, D., Mustillo, S. A., & Burns, B. J. (2009). Returning home in systems of care: rates, predictors and stability. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 17, 133–146. doi: 10.1177/1063426608327002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fernandez, E. A. (1996). Significant harm: Unravelling child protection decisions and substitute care careers of children. Avebury: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Fernandez, E. (1999). Pathways in substitute care: representation of placement careers of children using event history analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 21, 177–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fernandez, E., & Lee, J.-S. (2011). Returning children in care to their families: factors associated with the speed of reunification. Child Indicators Research, 4, 749–765. doi: 10.1007/s12187-011-9121-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goerge, R. M. (1990). The reunification process in substitute care. Social Service Review, 64, 422–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guo, S. & Wells, K. (2003). Research on timing of foster care outcomes: one methodological problem and approaches to its solution. Social Service Review, 77, 1–24.Google Scholar
  25. Karoll, B. R., & Poertner, J. (2003). Indicators for safe family reunification: how professionals differ. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 3, 139–160.Google Scholar
  26. Maas, H., & Engler, R. (1959). Children in need of parents. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Maluccio, A. N., Fein, E., & Davis, I. P. (1994). Family reunification: research findings, issues, and directions. Child Welfare, 5, 489–504.Google Scholar
  28. Marsh, J. C., Ryan, J. P., Choi, S., & Testa, M. F. (2006). Integrated services for families with multiple problems: obstacles to family reunification. Children and Youth Services Review, 28, 1074–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Osborn, A., Delfabbro, P. H., & Barber, J. G. (2008). The psychosocial functioning and family background of children experiencing significant placement instability in Australian out-of-home care. Children & Youth Services Review, 30, 447–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Seaberg, J. R., & Tolley, E. S. (1986). Predictors of length of stay in foster care. Social Work Research and Abstract, 22, 11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shaw, T. V. (2010). Reunification from foster care: inferring measures over time. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 475–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tilbury, C. (2009). The over-representation of indigenous children in the Australian child welfare system. International Journal of Social Welfare, 18, 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wells, S., & Guo, S. (1999). Reunification and reentry of foster children. Children & Youth Services Review, 21, 273–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Winokur, M., Holton, A., & Valentine, D. (2009). Kinship care for the safety, permanency and wellbeing of children removed from the home for maltreatment. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1, CD006546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.cD006546.pub2.Google Scholar
  35. Zeller, D. E., & Gamble, T. J. (2007). Improving child welfare performance: retrospective and prospective approaches. Child Welfare, 86, 97–122.Google Scholar
  36. Zinn, A. (2012). Kinship foster family type and placement discharge outcomes. Children and Youth Service Review, 34, 602–614. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.11.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Delfabbro
    • 1
  • Elizabeth Fernandez
    • 2
  • Jessica McCormick
    • 1
  • Lisa Ketter
    • 1
  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.School of Social Work and International StudiesUniversity of New South WalesKensingtonAustralia

Personalised recommendations