This paper provides insight into the participatory development process of a self-report questionnaire for adolescents: the Best Interest of the Child Self-report questionnaire (BIC-S). The BIC-S is based on the ‘Best Interest of the Child’ model. This model articulates, in line with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, 14 childcare conditions promoting the wellbeing and development of young people. The primary intention of the BIC-S is to give young people in care a voice regarding decisions in legal and care areas that impact their future. The development process of the BIC-S consisted of three main phases (exploration, consultation, pilot), containing a total of five different research stages. Adolescents placed in secure residential care, care professionals and university students were involved in the process. We developed a differentiated instrument that enables young people to express their own views on key aspects of their current and future living conditions. The digitized questionnaire is unique in its comprehensiveness, accessibility and attractiveness for young people, and generates an evaluative profile of care conditions from the adolescents themselves. The paper shows how a theoretically sound questionnaire can be constructed to conform to standards set by adolescents themselves. The BIC-S can serve as a productive vehicle for assessment and shared decision-making in the field of youth care – both at the micro level of individual treatment and at the meso level of evaluating group programmes. Further research into its use in practice is recommended.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Anglin, J. P. (2002). Pain, normality, and the struggle for congruence. Reinterpreting residential care for children and youth. New York: The Haworth Press, Inc.
Bartelink, C., Ten Berge, I., & Van Yperen, T. A. (2010). Beslissen over effectieve hulp. Wat werkt in indicatiestelling. [Decision-making on effective care. What works in professional assessment]. Utrecht: Dutch Youth Institute (NJi).
Belsky, J., & Vondra, J. (1989). Lessons from child abuse: The determinants of parenting. In D. Cicchetti & V. Carlson (Eds.), Child maltreatment: Theory and research on the causes and consequences of child abuse and neglect (pp. 153–202). New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511665707.007.
Bessell, S. (2011). Participation in decision-making in out-of-home care in Australia: what do young people say? Children and Youth Services Review, 33(4), 496–501.
Boendermaker, L., & Uit Beijerse, J. (2008). Opvoeding en bescherming achter ‘tralies’ [Educating and protecting young people behind ‘bars’]. Amsterdam: SWP Publishers.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2006). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Casas, F., González, M., Navarro, D., & Aligué, M. (2012). Children as advisors of their researchers: assuming a different status of children. Child Indicators Research, 6, 193–212.
CBS. (2013, July 13). Bevolking, geslacht, leeftijd en burgerlijke staat, 1 januari [population, gender, age and marital status, January 1]. Retrieved from http://statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb/publication.
Dedding, C., & Moonen, X. (2013). Kinderen en onderzoek: Gaat dat samen? [Children and research: Do they match?]. In C. Dedding, K. Jurrius, X. Moonen, & L. Rutjes (Eds.), Kinderen en jongeren actief in wetenschappelijk onderzoek [Children and youth active in scientific research] (pp. 11–39). Houten: LannooCampus.
Dedding, C., Jurrius, K., Moonen, X., & Rutjes, L. (Eds.). (2013). Kinderen en jongeren actief in wetenschappelijk onderzoek [Children and youth active in scientific research]. Houten: LannooCampus.
Elwyn, G. (2001). Shared decision making: patient involvement in clinical practice. PhD thesis. Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen.
Emond, R. (2008). Children’s voices, children’s rights. In A. Kendrick (Ed.), Residential childcare: Prospects and challenges (pp. 183–195). London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Farrington, D. P. (2003). Developmental and life-course criminology: key theoretical and empirical issues. The 2002 Sutherland award address. Criminology, 41(2), 221–255.
Fraser, S., Lewis, V., Ding, M., Kellett, M., & Robinson, C. (Eds.). (2004). Doing research with children and young people. London: Sage.
Harder, A. T. (2011). The downside up? A study of factors associated with a successful course of treatment for adolescents in secure residential care. PhD thesis. Groningen: University of Groningen.
Hardman, D. (2009). Judgment and decision making: Psychological perspectives. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hill, M. (2006). Children’s voices on ways of having a voice. Children’s and young people’s perspectives on methods used in research and consultation. Childhood, 13(1), 69–89.
Holland, S. (2009). Listening to children in care: a review of methodological and theoretical approaches to understanding looked after children’s perspectives. Children and Society, 23, 226–235.
Jeugdmonitor (2013). Veiligheid en Justitie [Safety and Justice]. Retrieved from: http://jeugdmonitor.cbs.nl/nl-nl/indicatoren/veiligheid-en-justitie.aspx.
Jeugdzorg Nederland. (2011). Brancherapportage jeugdzorg 2010 [branch report child and youth care 2010]. Utrecht: Author.
Kalverboer, M. E., Ten Brummelaar, M. D. C., Post, W. J., Zijlstra, A. E., Harder, A. T., & Knorth, E. J. (2012). The Best Interest of the Child – Questionnaire, reliability and validity: Preliminary data on the question ‘where to live after detention or secure treatment?’ Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 22(1), 41–52. doi:10.1002/cbm.825.
Kalverboer, M. E., & Zijlstra, A. E. (2006). The best interest of the child in Dutch law: Conditions for development starting from a pedagogical perspective. Amsterdam: SWP Publishers.
Kalverboer, M. E., Zijlstra, A. E., Ten Brummelaar, M. D. C., Huyghen, A. M. N., Winter, H. B., & Knorth, E. J. (2011). Children first? The significance of child-oriented social welfare reports for legal decision-making in asylum procedures. International Journal of Child and Family Welfare, 14(1), 2–18.
Kilkelly, U. (2010). Listening to children about justice: Report of the Council of Europe consultation with children on child-friendly justice. Group of Specialists on Child-friendly Justice (CJ-S-CH). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Knorth, E. J., & Koopmans, A. C. (2012). Minder kinderen uit huis geplaatst? [Less children placed out-of-home]. Kind en Adolescent, 33(1), 45–49.
Knorth, E. J., Meijers, J. P. M., Brouwer, A., Jansen, E., & Du Prie, H. (2004). Changing the horizon: Client feedback as a driving force behind innovations in residential child and youth care. In H. G. Eriksson, & T. Tjelflaat (eds.), Residential care: Horizons for the new century (pp. 23–37). Aldershot, UK / Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Kromhout, M. H. C., Eldering, L., & Knorth, E. J. (2000). Cultural differences in residential child and youth care: analyzing perspectives. Child and Youth Care Forum, 29(6), 359–372.
Leeson, C. (2007). My life in care: experiences of non-participation in decision-making processes. Child and Family Social Work, 12, 268–277.
Metselaar, J., Knorth, E. J., Noom, M. J., Van Yperen, T. A., & Konijn, C. (2004). Treatment planning for residential and non-residential care: a study on indication-for-treatment statements as input to the care process. Child and Youth Care Forum, 33(3), 151–173.
Morrow, V., & Richards, M. (1996). The ethics of social research with children: an overview. Children and Society, 10, 90–105.
Munro, E. (2001). Empowering looked after children. Child and Family Social Work, 6(2), 129–137.
Powell, M., & Smith, A. B. (2009). Children’s participation rights in research. Childhood, 16, 124–142.
Scheibler, F., & Pfaff, H. (2003). Shared decision-making: A new concept regarding the interaction between professionals and patients. In F. Scheibler & H. Pfaff (Eds.), Shared decision-making (pp. 11–22). Weinheim/Munich: Juventa. in German.
Schmidt, M. H., Schneider, K., Hohm, E., Pickartz, A., Macsenaere, M., Petermann, F., et al. (2003). Outcomes of child and family care and its determinants (Series of the ministry of family, elderly people, women and youth, Vol. 219). Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer Publishing. in german.
Schubert, C. A., Mulvey, E. P., Loughran, T. A., & Losoya, S. H. (2012). Perceptions of institutional experience and community outcomes for serious adolescent offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(1), 71–93. doi:10.1177/0093854811426710.
Sinclair, R. (1998). Research review. Involving children in planning their care. Child and Family Social Work, 3, 137–142.
Stacey, D., Bennett, C. L., Barry, M. J., Col, N. F., Eden, K. B., & Holmes-Rovner, M., et al. (2011). Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011(10), art. no. CD001431. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.
Strijker, J. (2008). Diagnostiek en het multiple informantenprobleem [Diagnostic assessment and the issue of multiple informants]. In E. J. Knorth, H. Nakken, C. E. Oenema-Mostert, A. J. J. M. Ruijssenaars, & J. Strijker (Eds.), De ontwikkeling van kinderen met problemen: gewoon anders [The development of children with problems: simply different] (pp. 69–79). Antwerp: Garant Publishers.
Thomas, N. (2011). Children’s rights: Policy into practice. Lismore: Southern Cross University, Centre for Children and Young People. Background Briefing Series, no. 4.
Trotter, J., & Campbell, C. (2008). Participation in decision making: disempowerment, disappointment and different directions. Ethics and Social Welfare, 2(3), 262–275.
UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC). (2009). General comment no. 12: the right of the child to be heard, 20 July 2009, CRC/C/GC/12, available at: http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/4ae562c52.html [accessed 6 October 2012].
UN Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC). (2013). General comment no. 14: on the right of the child to have his or her best interests taken as a primary consideration, 29 May 2013, CRC/C/GC/14, available at: http://www.crin.org/docs/GC.14.pdf [accessed September 2013].
Van Beek, F., & Rutjes, L. (2009). Kwaliteitsstandaarden jeugdzorg. Wat kinderen en jongeren belangrijk vinden als ze niet thuis wonen. [Quality standards youth care. What children and adolescents find important when they do not life at home]. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum.
Van Dam, C., Nijhof, K. S., Scholte, R. H. J., & Veerman, J. W. (2010). Evaluatie nieuw zorgaanbod. Gesloten jeugdzorg voor jongeren met ernstige gedragsproblemen [Evaluation new care services. Secure residential care for adolescents with severe behavioural problems]. Nijmegen: Praktikon/Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Van der Helm, P., Klapwijk, M., Stams, G. J., & Van der Laan, P. (2009). ‘What works’ for juvenile prisoners: the role of group climate in a youth prison. Journal of Children’s Services, 4(2), 36–48.
Van Nijnatten, C. H. C. J. (2010). Children’s agency, children’s welfare. A dialogical approach to child development, policy and practice. Bristol: Policy Press.
Van Staveren, R. (2011). Gezamenlijke besluitvorming in de praktijk [Shared decision-making in practice]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, 155(A3777), 1–5.
Veerman, J. W., & Van Yperen, T. A. (2007). Degrees of freedom and degrees of certainty. A developmental model for the establishment of evidence-based youth care. Evaluation and Program Planning, 30(2), 212–221.
Walker, J. S., Thorne, E. K., Powers, L. E., & Gaonkar, R. (2010). Development of a scale to measure the empowerment of youth consumers of mental health services. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 18(1), 51–59.
Wekema, L., & Post, E. (2012). De BIC vragenlijsten ter ondersteuning van de hulpverleningstrajecten binnen DOK3 & De Hulst [The BIC questionnaires as a support for the care trajectory within DOK3 and the Hulst]. (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Groningen, Groningen.
Zijlstra, A. E., Kalverboer, M. E., Post, W. J., Knorth, E. J., & Ten Brummelaar, M. D. C. (2012). The quality of the childrearing environment of refugee or asylum-seeking children and the Best Interests of the Child: Reliability and validity of the BIC-Q. Behavioral Sciences and The Law, 30(6), 841–855. doi:10.1002/bsl.1998.
Zijlstra, A. E., Kalverboer, M. E., Post, W. J., Ten Brummelaar, M. D. C., & Knorth, E. J. (2013). Could the BIC-Q be a decision-support tool to predict the development of asylum-seeking children? International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 35(2), 129–135. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2013.01.05.
The research was supported by grants from the Child Stamp Foundation, the Netherlands [Stichting Kinderpostzegels Nederland]. In addition, special thanks to L. Jansen, MSc, L. Wekema, MSc, and E. Post, MSc, for their contribution to the research.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
(PDF 170 kb)
About this article
Cite this article
ten Brummelaar, M.D.C., Kalverboer, M.E., Harder, A.T. et al. The Best Interest of the Child Self-Report Questionnaire (BIC-S): Results of a Participatory Development Process. Child Ind Res 7, 569–588 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-013-9225-3
- Youth participation
- Convention on the rights of the child
- Shared decision-making