Skip to main content
Log in

Cyberbullying: Insights and Age-Comparison Indicators from a Youth-Led Study in England

  • Published:
Child Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the findings of a youth-led study into the nature and prevalence of cyberbullying. Over 1,500 young people participated in the research which compared the experiences of two age groups - 12–13 year-olds and 14–15 year-olds - in nine regions of England. The dissipation of adult-youth power relations resulting from data accessed youth-to-youth and the foregrounding of young people’s insider perspectives enabled a more nuanced understanding of the issues to be generated. 40 % of the older youth group and 35 % of the younger age group reported being affected by cyberbullying. Results indicated age differentiators around risk statuses, coping strategies and skill-sets. Older youth were shown to experience higher levels of cyberbullying and aggressive methods, use peer-to-peer support and independent means such as internet provider reporting procedures to address the problem. Younger youth faced more discrete and traditional forms of cyberbullying, exhibited less knowledge for self-protection, and were more likely to seek help from parents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The research was commissioned by and developed with the Diana Award and was conducted over a period of 2 years from 2009 to 2011.

References

  • Akbulut, Y., Sahin, Y. L., & Eristi, B. (2010). Cyberbullying victimisation among Turkish online social utility members. Educational Technology and Society, 13(4), 192–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, A., Correia, I., & Marinho, S. (2009). Moral disengagement, normative beliefs of peer group, and attitudes regarding roles in bullying. Journal of School Violence, 9(1), 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AVG. (2010). Digital playground. Amsterdam and London: Research Now and Anti-Virus Guard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R. (2011). Letting children be children: Report of an independent review of the commercialisation and sexualisation of childhood. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryce, J. (2009). Internet years project. London: Orange UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M., Spears, B., Slee, P., Butler, D., & Kift, S. (2009). Lost in cyberspace: Exploring the incidence and impact of, and legal solutions to cyberbullying in an Australian context. In E. Menesini, P. Smith, & R. Zukauskiene (Eds.), Cyberbullying: Definition and measurement. Vilunius: Mykolas Romeris University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, Y. J., Kim, D. & Seo, Y. (2011). Effect of emotion regulation for cyberbullied adolescents: A structural equation modelling approach. Presentation at the 119th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, USA, http://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2011/08/cyberworld.aspx [Last accessed 20th August 2012].

  • Couvillon, M. A., & Ilieva, V. (2011). Recommended practices: a review of schoolwide preventative programs and strategies on cyberbullying. Preventing School Failure, 55(2), 96–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, I., Chesney, T., Logan, B., & Madden, N. (2009). Griefing in a virtual community: an explanatory survey of second life residents. Journal of Psychology, 217(4), 214–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, E. J., Richardson, B., Douglas, T., & Vonkaenel-Flatt, J. (2009). Virtual violence: Protecting children from cyberbullying. London: Beatbullying.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education. (2011a). Preventing and tackling bullying: Advice for school leaders, staff and governing bodies. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education. (2011b). Behaviour and discipline in schools: Guidance for governing bodies. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1995). Sociology (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: an exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29(2), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2009). Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications (Corwin Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, M. E. (2009). E-bullies: The detrimental effects of cyberbullying on students’ life satisfaction. Ohio: Miami University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellett, M. (2011). Empowering children and young people as researchers: overcoming barriers and building capacity. Child Indicators Research Journal, 4(2), 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, R., & Limber, S. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S22–S30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Gorzig, A., & Olafsson, K. (2011). Risks and safety on the internet: The perspective of European children. London: London School of Economics, EU Kids Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • MRS. (2006). Conducting research with children and young people. UK: Market Research Standards.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCB. (2010). Voluntary sector support policy briefing – Transitions between children’s and adult’s health services, and the role of voluntary and community children’s sector. London: National Children’s Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCH (2005). Putting U in the picture – Mobile phone bullying survey 2005. Retrieved from http://www.nch.org.uk/uploads/documents/Mobile_bullying_%20report.pdf [Last accessed 22 August 2012].

  • O’Brien, N., & Moules, T. (2010). The impact of cyberbullying on young people’s mental health. Chelmsford: Anglia Ruskin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spears, B., Slee, P., Owens, L. & Johnson, B. (2008). Behind the scenes: Insight into the human dimension of covert bullying, University of South Australia. Centre for the Analysis of Educational Futures.

  • Steinhauer, J. (2008). Verdict in my space case. New York Times, 27th November 2008.

  • Stratham, J., & Chase, E. (2010). Childhood wellbeing: A brief overview. Briefing paper 1. London: Childhood Wellbeing Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, K. (2000). The anti-bullying handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF. (2007). Child poverty in perspective: An overview of child wellbeing in rich countries, innocenti report card 7. Florence: UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF. (2011). The state of the world’s children 2011: Adolescence - an age of opportunity. New York: UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Kellett.

Additional information

Around 1,500 young people participated in this study, mostly anonymously, and too many to name but we gratefully acknowledge their input and contribution to the knowledge generated

Saima Tarapdar is a young independent researcher

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tarapdar, S., Kellett, M. & Young People. Cyberbullying: Insights and Age-Comparison Indicators from a Youth-Led Study in England. Child Ind Res 6, 461–477 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-012-9177-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-012-9177-z

Keywords

Navigation