Child Indicators Research

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 205–241 | Cite as

Measuring Government Performance in Realising Child Rights and Child Wellbeing: The Approach and Indicators

  • Yehualashet MekonenEmail author


Most governments have an impressive record in their formal accession to the relevant international child rights treaties. But the extent of their commitment to children varies widely and the gap between promises and reality remains wide. In response, we, at The African Child Policy Forum, developed an approach to measure government performance in realising children’s rights and ensuring their wellbeing. The approach quantitatively measures how well governments are doing in meeting their national and international obligations to children through the Child-friendliness Index. This composite index is used to assess and rank the performance of all 52 African governments using a common set of indicators. It provides an indication of how prioritised children’s issues are in African governments’ policy agendas, and the extent to which those agendas are child-friendly. According to the Child-friendliness Index ranking, Mauritius and Namibia emerged as the first and second most child-friendly governments, respectively, in Africa. In addition to these two, the “most child-friendly governments” group consists of both countries with high economic performance as well as those with a low status. The analysis also showed that national wealth and a high level of development are not guarantees of child wellbeing. The results further indicated that change and progress towards ensuring child wellbeing are possible and feasible even at very low levels of development and calls for: (a) adoption and implementation of effective laws and policies; and (b) a policy of child budgeting that prioritises the needs of children.


Government Performance Child wellbeing Child-friendliness Index Governance Policy 


  1. African Child Policy Forum (2007). In the Best Interests of the Child: Harmonisation of laws in Eastern and Southern Africa. Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
  2. African Child Policy Forum (2008). The African Report on Child Wellbeing 2008: How child-friendly are African governments? (Addis Ababa: The African Child Policy Forum).Google Scholar
  3. Ainsaar, M., & Aidarov, A. (2003). Role of local governments in supporting families with children. Tartu: Tartu University.Google Scholar
  4. Anand, S., & Sen, A. (1994). Human development index: Methodology and measurement. New York: Human Development Office.Google Scholar
  5. Ben-Arieh, A., & George, R. (2001). Beyond the numbers: how do we monitor the state of our children? Children and Youth Services Review, 23(8), 603–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Booysen, F. (2002). An overview and evaluation of composite indices of development. Social Indicators Research, 59(2), 115–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradshaw, J., Hoelscher, P. and Richardson, D. (2006). Child Wellbeing in OECD Countries: Concepts and Methods, Working Paper No. 2006-03, Florence: UNICEF- Innocenti Research Centre.Google Scholar
  8. Cahill, M. (2005). Is the human development index redundant? Eastern Economic Journal, 31(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
  9. Economic Intelligence Unit (EIU) (2007). Methodology, Results and Findings, Global Peace Index, Cammeray; Accessed in October 2007 at
  10. McGillivray, M., & White, H. (1993). Measuring development? The UNDP’s human development index. Journal of International Development, 5(2), 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McGillivray, M., & Noorbakhsh, F. (2004). Composite indices of human wellbeing: Past, present and future. Helsinki: United Nations University, WIDER.Google Scholar
  12. Mo Ibrahim Foundation (2007). Index of African Governance 2007, The Mo Ibrahim Foundation. Available at: http://www.moibrahimfoundation.or/index/overall.pdf.
  13. Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffman, A., & Giovannini, E. (2005). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide, working paper. Paris: OECD Statistics Directorate.Google Scholar
  14. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) (2007). Accessed in January 2009 at:
  15. Salzman, J. (2003). Methodological Choices Encountered in the Construction of Composite Indices of Economic and Social Wellbeing. Center for the Study of Living Standards.Google Scholar
  16. Theis, J. (2003). Rights-based monitoring and evaluation: A discussion paper. Bangkok: Save the Children Alliance.Google Scholar
  17. UNDP. (2000). Human development report 2000: Human rights and human development. New York: Human Development Office.Google Scholar
  18. UNICEF. (2004). Building child-friendly cities: A framework for action. Florence: Innocenti Research Centre.Google Scholar
  19. UNOHCHR. (2001). Training manual on human rights monitoring. Professional training series no.7. Geneva: OHCHR.Google Scholar
  20. Wiesmann, D. (2006). A global hunger index: Measurement concept, ranking of countries, and trends, discussion paper. Washington: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  21. William W. and Kane T. (2007). Methodology: Measuring the 10 Economic Freedoms, 2007 Index of Economic Freedom. The Heritage Foundation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The African Child Policy ForumAddis AbabaEthiopia

Personalised recommendations