Vocations and Learning

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 71–99 | Cite as

Educational Transfer as Transformation: A Case Study about the Emergence and Implementation of Dual Apprenticeship Structures in a German Automotive Transplant in the United States

Original Paper

Abstract

The apprenticeship system in Germany is carried out both by companies and vocational schools (the Dual System). The question of whether the German Dual System is transferable is currently being asked in vocational education and training research. The analysis of current transfer discourses alludes to a research desideratum: the actual approaches consider either the input or the output of an educational transfer, but the transfer process in relation to its input and output has not been investigated to date. We focus on this desideratum. In the present case study, the processes emergence and implementation of dual apprenticeship structures is analysed in relation to its input and output in a German automotive transplant in the United States. Transplant organisations provide an ideal case to explore the transfer phenomenon because they have been transferred from a familiar context to a foreign context. The research questions are: firstly, why and how did the need emerge to implement dual apprenticeship structures in the German transplant in the United States (input); secondly, how and in which way have these structures been implemented (process); and thirdly, how can the implemented structures be characterised: as an imitation, adaptation or transformation of the original model (output)? The central findings of the case study are: firstly, that growing contradictions in the production system triggered the implementation process; secondly, that the original Dual System was transformed within the implementation process; and thirdly, that this transformation led to innovative solutions. These findings may not be valid for every transfer at any time, but they reflect that educational transfer of dual apprenticeship structures can be more than just a more or less successful imitation or adaptation.

Keywords

Apprenticeship Transfer Transformation Dual system Vocational education and training Production system Automotive transplant Case study 

References

  1. Apfelthaler, G., Muller, H., & Rehder, R. (2002). Corporate global culture as competitive advantage: learning from germany and japan in alabama and austria? Journal of World Business, 37(2), 108–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: a review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 63–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barabasch, A., & Wolf, S. (2011). Internationaler policy transfer in der Berufsbildung: Konzeptionelle Überlegungen und theoretische Grundlagen am Beispiel deutscher Transferaktivitäten. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 14(2), 283–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BIBB (Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung). (2012). Memorandum on cooperation in vocational education and training in europe. Retrieved from http://www.bibb.de/dokumente/pdf/memorandumvocational_education_and_training_2012.pdf.
  5. Biermann, H., Greinert, W.-D., & Janisch, R. (1994). Systementwicklung in der Berufsbildung: Berichte, Analysen und Konzepte zur internationalen Zusammenarbeit. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  6. Bliem, W., Schmid, K., & Petanovitsch, A. (2014). Erfolgsfaktoren der dualen Ausbildung. Transfermöglichkeiten. Austria: Institut für Bildungsforschung der Wirtschaft.Google Scholar
  7. BMBF (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung). (2015). Berufsbildungsbericht 2015. Berlin: BMBF.Google Scholar
  8. Bowen, G. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyer, R., & Freyssenet, M. (2003). Produktionsmodelle: Eine Typologie am Beispiel der Automobilindustrie. Berlin: edition sigma.Google Scholar
  10. Bracht, U., Meyer, O., & Oeltjenbruns, H. (1999). Standardized assembly process planning based on the toyota production system. doi:10.4271/1999-01-3002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Braun, M. (2003). Stern mit Flecken. Autobild. Retrieved from http://www.autobild.de.
  12. Burchert, J., Hoeve, A., & Kämäräinen, P. (2014). Interactive research on innovations in vocational education and training (VET): lessons from Dutch and German cases. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 1(2), 143–160.Google Scholar
  13. Burgt, J., Li, J., Wilbertz, C., & Pilz, M. (2014). Qualifizierungsstrategien deutscher Unternehmen in Japan, Indien und China: Deutsche Vorbilder oder einheimische Verfahrensweisen? Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 17(1), 135–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Busemeyer, M. (2009). Wandel trotz Reformstau: Die Politik der beruflichen Bildung seit 1970. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  15. Busemeyer, M., & Trampusch, C. (2012). The comparative political economy of collective skill formation. In M. Busemeyer & C. Trampusch (Eds.), The political economy of collective skill formation (pp. 3–38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Cooper, D. (2001). How can we improve the workplace? Tuscaloosa News. Retrieved from http://www.tuscaloosanews.com.
  17. Cusumano, M. (1985). The japanese automobile industry: Technology & management at nissan & toyota. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. DaimlerChrysler. (1999). Mercedes-Benz Produktionssystem: Systembeschreibung. Stuttgart: DaimlerChrysler AG.Google Scholar
  19. Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom? a review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, 44(2), 343–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dybowski, G., Pütz, H., & Rauner, F. (Eds.). (1995). Berufsbildung und Organisationsentwicklung: Perspektiven, Modelle und Forschungsfragen. Bremen: Donat.Google Scholar
  21. Eisenhardt, K., & Graebner, M. (2007). Theory builing from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Elsholz, U. (Ed.). (2015). Beruflich Qualifizierte im Studium: Analysen und Konzepte zum Dritten Bildungsweg. Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
  23. Elsner, W., Hocker, G., & Schwardt, H. (2010). Simplistic vs. complex organization: markets, hierarchies, and networks in an organizational triangle – a simple heuristic to analyze real-world organizational forms. Journal of Economic Issues, 44(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Euler, D. (2013). Germany’s dual vocational training system: A model for other countries? Gütersloh: Bertelsmann-Stiftung.Google Scholar
  26. EUROSTAT. (2015). Harmonised unemployment rate by age group 15-24 and total unemployment rate. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/lfs/data/main-tables.
  27. Fischer, M., Heidegger, G., Petersen, A., & Spöttl, G. (Eds.). (2001). Gestalten statt Anpassen in Arbeit, Technik und Beruf. Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
  28. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gessler, M. (2012). Lerntransfer in der beruflichen Weiterbildung: Empirische Prüfung eines integrierten Rahmenmodells mittels Strukturgleichungsmodellierung. Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik, 108(3), 362–393.Google Scholar
  30. Gessler, M., & Howe, F. (2013). The german dual vocational training system: the origin of the current architecture. Bulletin of Institute of Technology and Vocational Education, Nagoya University Japan, 10, 17–28.Google Scholar
  31. Gessler, M., & Howe, F. (2015). From the reality of work to grounded work-based learning in German vocational education and training: Background, concept and tools. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 2(3), 214–238.Google Scholar
  32. Gonon, P. (2014). Development cooperation in the field of vocational education and training: the dual system as a global role model? In M. Maurer & P. Gonon (Eds.), The challenges of policy transfer in vocational skill development (pp. 241–259). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  33. Granato, M., & Ulrich, J. G. (2014). Soziale Ungleichheit beim Zugang in eine Berufsbildung: Welche Bedeutung haben die Institutionen? Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 17(2), 205–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gräsel, C. (2010). Stichwort: transfer und Transferforschung im Bildungsbereich. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 13(1), 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Greinert, W.-D. (2001). Die Übertragbarkeit des Dualen systems in Entwicklungsländer: Möglichkeiten und Begrenzungen einer politischen Strategie. In T. Deissinger (Ed.), Berufliche Bildung zwischen nationaler Tradition und globaler Entwicklung (pp. 45–60). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  36. Greinert, W.-D. (2013). Erwerbsqualifizierung als Berufsausbildung – bleibt dies die ultimative Lösung? BWP Berufsbildung in Wissenschaft und Praxis, 42(3), 11–15.Google Scholar
  37. Greinert, W.-D., & Wolf, S. (2013). Die Berufsschule – radikale Neuorientierung oder Abstieg zur Restschule (2nd ed.). Berlin: Universitätsverlag TU Berlin.Google Scholar
  38. Haasen, A. (1999). M-Class: the making of a new daimler-benz. Organizational Dynamics, 27(4), 74–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In P. A. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundation of comparative advantages (pp. 1–68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hawk, M. (2007). Mercedes plant celebrates 10 years. Tuscaloosa News. Retrieved from http://www.tuscaloosanews.com.
  41. Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Johansson, R. (2003). Case study methodology. Paper presented at the International Conference Methodologies in Housing Research, Stockholm. Retrieved from http://de.slideshare.net/omermirza/131396105-casestudymethodology.
  43. Johansson, R. (2007). On case study methodology. Open House International, 32(3), 48–54.Google Scholar
  44. Kampis, J. (2005). On a first-name basis: MBUSI CEO Bill Taylor boasts about the atmosphere, people at Vance. Tuscaloosa News. Retrieved from http://www.tuscaloosanews.com.
  45. Kern, H., & Schumann, M. (1984). Das Ende der Arbeitsteilung? Rationalisierung in der industriellen Produktion. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
  46. Lewis, T. (2007). The problem of cultural fit: what can we learn from borrowing the German dual system? Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 37(4), 463–477.Google Scholar
  47. Manske, F. (1990). The end of taylorism – or its transformation? from spot control to systemic control of the production process. International Journal of Political Economy, 20(4), 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nickolaus, R., & Gräsel, C. (2006). Innovation und transfer: Expertisen zur transferforschung. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Hohengehren.Google Scholar
  49. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2000). Measuring student knowledge and skills: The PISA 2000 assessment of reading, mathematical and scientific literacy. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  50. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2010). Learning for jobs: OECD reviews of vocational education and training. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  51. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2014). Skills beyond school: Synthesis report. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  52. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2015). Short-term labour market statistic: Unemployment rate by age and gender. Retrieved from http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=36499.
  53. Oeltjenbruns, H. (2000). Organisation der Produktion nach dem Vorbild Toyota: Analyse, Vorteile und detaillierte Voraussetzungen sowie die Vorgehensweise zur erfolgreichen Einführung am Beispiel eines globalen Automobilkonzerns. Aachen: Shaker.Google Scholar
  54. Ohno, T. (1988). Toyota production system: Beyond large-scale production. Portland: Productivity Press.Google Scholar
  55. Perry, B. L., & Tor, G.-H. (2009). Understanding educational transfer: theoretical perspectives and conceptual frameworks. Prospects, 38(4), 509–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (2003). Processes of policy borrowing in education: some explanatory and analytical devices. Comparative Education, 39(4), 451–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pilz, M. (2016). Training patterns of German companies in India, China, Japan and the USA: what really works? International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 3(2), 66–85.Google Scholar
  58. Pilz, M., & Li, J. (2014). Tracing teutonic footprints in VET around the world? the skills development strategies of German companies in the USA, China and India. European Journal of Training and Development, 38(8), 745–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Placklé, I., Könings, K., Jacquet, W., Struyven, K., Libotton, A., Merriënboer, J., & Engels, N. (2014). Students’ preferred characteristics of learning environments in vocational secondary education. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 1(2), 107–124.Google Scholar
  60. Rubinski, P., & Writer, S. (2010). Schaefer was key to bringing the C-Class to vance. Tuscaloosa News. Retrieved from http://www.tuscaloosanews.com.
  61. Saldana, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  62. Springer, R. (1999). Rückkehr zum Taylorismus? Arbeitspolitik in der Automobilindustrie am Scheideweg. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  63. Stockmann, R. (1996). Die Wirksamkeit der Entwicklungshilfe: Eine evaluation der Nachhaltigkeit von Programmen und Projekten der Berufsbildung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stockmann, R. (2013). Metaevaluierung. In R. Stockmann & S. Silvestrini (Eds.), Metaevaluierung Berufsbildung: Ziele, Wirkungen und Erfolgsfaktoren der deutschen Berufsbildungszusammenarbeit (pp. 108–177). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  65. Tsang, E. (2013). Case study methodology: causal explanation, contextualization and theorizing. Journal of International Management, 19(2), 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. U.S. Department of Labor (2008). Code of federal regulations: Labor standards for the registration of apprenticeship programs. Retrieved from http://www.lni.wa.gov/TradesLicensing/Rules/files/apprenticeship/29CFRPart29.pdf.
  67. UN (United Nations). (2000). United nations millennium declaration: Resolution adopted by the general assembly, September 18. New York: UN.Google Scholar
  68. UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). (2012). Youth and skills: Putting education to work. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  69. Ure, O. (2015). Governance for learning outcomes in european policy-making: qualification frameworks pushed through the open method of coordination. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 2(4), 268–283.Google Scholar
  70. WCEFA (World Conference on Education for All). (1990). World conference on education for all: Meeting basic learning needs. New York: UNICEF.Google Scholar
  71. Wolf, S. (2009). Berufsbildung und Kultur: Ein Beitrag zur Theorie der Berufsbildung in der Entwicklungszusammenarbeit. Tönning: Der andere Verlag.Google Scholar
  72. Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1990). The machine that changed the world: The story of lean production. New York: Rawson Associates.Google Scholar
  73. Wortham, A. (2003). Mercedes-Benz announces west alabama apprenticeship program. Tuscaloosa News. Retrieved from http://www.tuscaloosanews.com.
  74. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O. (2005). Kooperation zwischen Ausbildungsinstitutionen und Lernorten in der beruflichen Bildung: eine multidisziplinäre analyse. Bildungsforschung, 2(1), 1–26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute Technology and Education (ITB)University of BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations