Advertisement

Vocations and Learning

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 1–26 | Cite as

You Learn by your Mistakes. Effective Training Strategies Based on the Analysis of Video-Recorded Worked-out Examples

  • Alberto A. P. CattaneoEmail author
  • Elena Boldrini
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper presents an empirical study on procedural learning from errors that was conducted within the field of vocational education. It examines whether, and to what extent, procedural learning can benefit more from the detection and written analysis of errors (experimental condition) than from the correct elements (control group). The study involved 136 commercial employee apprentices who were working on a videorecorded, worked-out example of a professional procedure involving customer counselling. The results showed no differences between the conditions with regards to declarative knowledge acquisition during the procedure. Additionally, the analysis of errors was demonstrated to be more effective than the analysis of correct behaviours in terms of (1) representing a much more detailed and correct procedure and (2) developing anticipatory knowledge about possible errors to be avoided. The results highlighted the value of the inductive instructional strategy (from the analysis of a single worked-out example to the learning of the general procedure) and opened the field up for future applications of a similar instructional approach combining roleplaying and video analysis of errors in vocational education to develop communication skills.

Keywords

Learning from errors Worked-out examples Writing-to-learn Vocational education and training 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study presented here is part of a series of activities of the Swiss “Technologies for Vocational Training” Leading House funded by the State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI) within the Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research (EAER) [BB.2009.0175]. We would thank Claudia Sassi, Marco Ricci and all the trainers at the Società Impiegati di Commercio (SIC Ticino) whose support was fundamental for this experience; and Carlo Tomasetto for his precious contributions and suggestions.

References

  1. Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. F., Corbett, A., & Lewis, M. W. (1990). Cognitive modelling and intelligent tutoring. Artificial Intelligence, 42(1), 7–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arguel, A., & Jamet, E. (2009). Using video and static pictures to improve learning of procedural contents. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 354–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baartman, L. K. J., & de Bruijn, E. (2011). Integrating knowledge, skills and attitudes: Conceptualising learning processes towards vocational competence. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baird, L., Holland, P., & Deacon, S. (1999). Learning from action: imbedding more learning into the performance fast enough to make a difference. Organizational Dynamics, 27(4), 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauer, J., & Gruber, H. (2007). Workplace changesand workplace learning: advantages of an educational micro perspective. International Jorunal of Lifelong Learning, 26(6), 675–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bauer, J., & Harteis, C. (Eds.) (2012). Human fallibility. The ambiguity of errors for work and learning. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Bauer, J., & Mulder, R. H. (2007). Modelling learning from errors in daily work. Learning in Health and Social Care, 6(3), 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bauer, J., & Mulder, R. H. (2008). Conceptualisation of learning through errors at work - a literature review. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & A. Eteläpelto (Eds.), Emerging perspectives of workplace learning (pp. 115–128). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Bauer, J., Gartmeier, M., & Harteis, C. (2012). Human fallibility and learning from errors at work. In J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Eds.), Human fallibility. The ambiguity of errors for work and learning (pp. 155–169). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baumgartner, A., & Seifried, J. (2012). Professional handling of errors in the workplace. In E. Wuttke & J. Seifried (Eds.), Learning from errors at school and at work (pp. 127–141). Opladen, Berlin & Farmington Hills, MI: Vorlag Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
  11. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Berkhof, M., van Rijssen, H. J., Schellart, A. J. M., Anema, J. R., & van der Beek, A. J. (2011). Effective training strategies for teaching communication skills to physicians: an overview of systematic reviews. Patient Education and Counseling, 84, 152–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Billett, S. (2012). Errors and learning from errors at work. In J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Eds.), Human fallibility. The ambiguity of errors for work and learning (pp. 17–32). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boldrini, E., & Cattaneo, A. (2012). Collaborative writing on professional experiences as a means for fostering reflective thinking in VET curricula. In C. Gelati, B. Arfé, & L. Mason (Eds.), Issues in writing research (pp. 180–188). Padova: Cleup.Google Scholar
  15. Boldrini, E., & Cattaneo, A. (2013). Written identification of errors to learn professional procedures in VET. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 65(4), 525–542.Google Scholar
  16. Booth, J. L., Lange, K. E., Koedinger, K. R., & Newton, K. J. (2013). Using example problems to improve student learning in algebra: differentiating between correct and incorrect examples. Learning and Instruction, 25, 24–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Boscolo, P., & Mason, L. (2001). Writing to learn, writing to transfer. In P. Tynjala, L. Mason, & K. Lonka (Eds.), Writing as a learning tool: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 83–104). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cannon, M. D., & Edmondson, A. C. (2005). Failing to learn and learning to Fail (intelligently): how great organizations put failure to work to innovate and improve. Long Range Planning: International Journal of Strategic Management, 38(3), 299–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cattaneo, A., & Boldrini, E. (2016). Individual and collaborative writing-to-learn activities in vocational education: an overview of different instructional strategies. In G. Ortoleva, M. Bétrancourt, & S. Billett (Eds.), Writing for professional development (pp. 188–208). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.Google Scholar
  20. Cattaneo, A., Nguyen, A. T., & Aprea, C. (2016). Teaching and learning with Hypervideo in vocational education and training. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 25(1), 5–35.Google Scholar
  21. Chi, M. T. H., De Leeuw, N., Chiu, M.-H., & La Vancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3), 439–477.Google Scholar
  22. Colasante, M. (2011). Using video annotation to reflect on and evaluate physical education pre-service teaching practice. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1), 66–88.Google Scholar
  23. Curry, L. A. (2004). The Effects of Self-Explanations of Correct and Incorrect Solutions on Algebra Problem-Solving Performance. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society Mahwah, NJ (pp. 1548): ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
  24. Daetwyler, C. J., Cohen, D. G., Gracely, E., & Novack, D. H. (2010). eLearning to enhance physician patient communication: a pilot test of “doc.Com” and “WebEncounter” in teaching bad news delivery. Medical Teacher, 32, e381–e390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dalehefte, I. M., Seidel, T., & Prenzel, M. (2012). Reflecting on learning from errors in school instruction: findings and suggestions from a Swiss-German video study. In J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Eds.), Human fallibility. The ambiguity of errors for work and learning (pp. 197–213). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Davis, E. A. (2003). Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: generic and directed prompts. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 91–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dörner, D., & Schaub, H. (1994). Errors in planning and decision-making and the nature of human information processing. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 43(4), 433–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Durkin, K., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2012). The effectiveness of using incorrect examples to support learning about decimal magnitude. Learning and Instruction, 22(3), 206–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Edmondson, A. C. (2004). Learning from failure in health care: frequent opportunities, pervasive barriers. Quality and safety in Health Care, 13(suppl 2), ii3–ii9.Google Scholar
  30. Ellis, S. (2012). Learning from errors: the role of after-event reviews. In J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Eds.), Human fallibility. The ambiguity of errors for work and learning (pp. 215–232). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ellis, S., & Davidi, I. (2005). After-event reviews: drawing lessons from successful and failed experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 857–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1994). Action as the core of work psychology: a German approach. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 4, 2 ed., pp. 271–340). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  33. Galbraith, D. (1999). Writing as a knowledge-constituting process. In M. Torrance & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Knowing What to Write: Conceptual Processes in Text Production (pp. 139–160). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Gartmeier, M., & Schüttelkopf, E. M. (2012). Tracing outcomes of learning from errors on the level of knowledge. In J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Eds.), Human fallibility. The ambiguity of errors for work and learning (pp. 33–51). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gartmeier, M., Bauer, J., Gruber, H., & Heid, H. (2010). Workp!Ace errors and negative knowledge in elder care nursing. Human Resource Development International, 13(1), 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gartmeier, M., Bauer, J., Fischer, M. R., Hoppe-Seyler, T., Karsten, G., Kiessling, C., et al. (2015). Fostering professional communication skills of future physicians and teachers: effects of e-learning with video cases and role-play. Instructional Science. doi: 10.1007/s11251-014-9341-6.Google Scholar
  37. Gavota, M., Bétrancourt, M., & Schneider, D. K. (2010a). Writing and commenting on professional procedures. In K. Gomez, L. Lyons, & J. Radinsky (Eds.), 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2010) – Volume 1, Full Papers Chicago IL (pp. 683–689). International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
  38. Gavota, M., Cattaneo, A., Arn, C., Boldrini, E., Motta, E., Schneider, D. K., et al. (2010b). Computer-supported peer commenting: a promising instructional method to promote skill development in vocational education. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 62(4), 495–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Große, C. S., & Renkl, A. (2007). Finding and fixing errors in worked examples: can this foster learning outcomes? Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 612–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hallgren, K. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Harteis, C., & Buschmeyer, K. (2012). Learning from mistakes - still a challenge for research and business practice. In E. Wuttke & J. Seifried (Eds.), Learning from errors at school and at work (pp. 31–47). Opladen, Berlin & Farmington Hills, MI: Vorlag Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
  42. Hausmann, R. G. M., & Chi, M. T. H. (2002). Can a computer Interface support self-explaining? Cognitive Technology, 7(1), 4–14.Google Scholar
  43. Hausmann, R. G. M., & Van Lehn, K. (2010). The effect of self-explaining on robust learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10(4), 303–332.Google Scholar
  44. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  45. Heimbeck, D., Frese, M., Sonnentag, S., & Keith, N. (2003). Integrating errors into the training process: the function of error management instructions and the role of goal orientation. Personnel Psychology, 56(2), 333–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Heinze, A., Ufer, S., Rach, S., & Reiss, K. (2012). The student perspective on dealing with errors in mathematics class. In E. Wuttke & J. Seifried (Eds.), Learning from errors at school and at work (pp. 65–79). Opladen, Berlin & Farmington Hills, MI: Vorlag Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
  47. Hübner, S., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2010). Writing learning journals: instructional support to overcome learning-strategy deficits. Learning and Instruction, 20(1), 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Illeris, K. (2011). The fundamentals of workplace learning. Understanding how people learn in working life. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory Vol.II (pp. 215–239). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  50. Jonasson, C. (2015). Interactional processes of handling errors in vocational schools: students attending to changes in vocational practices. Vocations and Learning, 8(1), 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kember, D. (2001). Reflective teaching and learning in the health profession. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Klein, P. D., Boscolo, P., Kirckpatrick, L. C., & Gelati, C. (Eds.) (2014). Writing as a Learning Activity (studies in writing). Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  53. Leicher, V., Mulder, R. H., & Bauer, J. (2013). Learning from errors at work: a replication study in elder care nursing. Vocations and Learning, 6(2), 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lukinsky, J. (1990). Reflective withdrawal through journal writing. In J. Mezirow, & Associates (Eds.), Fostering critical reflection in adulthood (pp. 213–234). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  55. Mayer, R. E. (Ed.) (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Merkt, M., Weigand, S., Heier, A., & Schwan, S. (2011). Learning with videos vs. learning with print: the role of interactive features. Learning and Instruction, 21(6), 687–704.Google Scholar
  57. Minnameier, G. (2012). What's wrong with it? - kinds and inferential mechanics of errors and mistakes. In E. Wuttke & J. Seifried (Eds.), Learning from errors at school and at work (pp. 13–29). Opladen, Berlin & Farmington Hills, MI: Vorlag Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
  58. Moon, J. (1999). Reflection in learning and professional development. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  59. Mu, X. (2010). Towards effective video annotation: an approach to automatically link notes with video content. Computers & Education, 55, 1752–1763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mwangi, W., & Sweller, J. (1998). Learning to solve compare word problems: the effect of example format and generating self-explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 16(2), 173–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nückles, M. (2015). Writing as a learning activity [review of the book Writing as a Learning Activity (studies in writing series) by Klein, P.D., Boscolo, P. Kirckpatrick, L. C., & Gelati, C. (Eds.)]. Journal of Writing Research, 6(3), 318–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ohlsson, S. (1996). Learning from performance errors. Psychological Review, 103(2), 241–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Oser, F. (2007). Aus Fehler lernen. In M. Göhlich, C. Wulf, & J. Zirfas (Eds.), Pädagogische Theorien des lernen (pp. 203–212). Weinheim-Basel: Betz.Google Scholar
  64. Oser, F., & Spychiger, M. (2005). Lernen ist schmerzhaft. Zur Theorie des negativen Wissens und zur praxis der Fehlerkultur. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  65. Rasmussen, J. (1987). The definition of human error and a taxonomy for technical system design. In J. Rasmussen, K. Duncan, & J. Leplat (Eds.), New technology and human error (pp. 23–30). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  66. Rausch, A. (2012). Errors, emotions, and learning in the workplace - findings from a diary study within VET. In E. Wuttke & J. Seifried (Eds.), Learning from errors at school and at work (pp. 111–126). Opladen, Berlin & Farmington Hills, MI: Vorlag Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
  67. Reason, J. (1990). Human error. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Reason, J. (1995). Understanding adverse events: human factors. Quality in Health Care, 4, 80–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Renkl, A. (2002). Worked-out examples: instructional explanations support learning by self-explanations. Learning and Instruction, 12(5), 529–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rich, P., & Hannafin, M. (2009). Video annotation tools: technologies to scaffold, structure, and transform teacher reflection. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rich, P., & Trip, T. (2011). Ten essential questions educators should ask when using video annotation tools. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 55(6), 16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rittle-Johnson, B. (2006). Promoting transfer: the effects of direct instruction and self-explanation. Child Development, 77(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rosenheck, M., Kohlhaas, P., Bastian, D., & Schlegel, C. (2007). Projekt Zukunft der beruflichen Grundbildung im kaufmännischen Berufsfeld. Bericht zur Szenarioanalyse [Project 'The future of initial vocational education in the commercial field'. Report on the scenarios analysis]. Winterthur: Zürcher Hochschule Winterthur - Zentrum Human Capital Management ZHCM.Google Scholar
  74. Schraw, G. (2006). Knowledge: structures and processes. In P. A. Alexander, & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 245–263). Mahaw, NJ - London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  75. Schumacher, G. M., & Gradwohl Nash, J. (1991). Conceptualizing and measuring knowledge change due to writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 67–96.Google Scholar
  76. Schworm, S., & Renkl, A. (2006). Computer-supported example-based learning: when instructional explanations reduce self-explanations. Computers & Education, 46(4), 426–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation SERI (2014). Piano di formazione – Impiegato/a di commercio AFC [learning plan – commercial employee]. Bern: Conferenza svizzera dei rami commerciali di formazione e d’esame (CSFRC). Available at: http://www.skkab.ch/download/pictures/44/ea1261543h63h3bmgnovd31h1dpgho/bildungsplan_sog_erlass_i_2014_11_21.pdf.
  78. Siegler, R. S. (2002). Microgenetic studies of self-explanation. In N. Granott & J. Parziale (Eds.), Microdevelopment. Transition processes in development and learning (pp. 31–58). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Spiro, R. J., Collins, B. P., & Ramchandran, A. (2007). Reflections on a post-Gutenberg epistemology for video use in ill-structured domains: fostering complex learning and cognitive flexibility. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 93–100). Mahwahm NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  80. Taatgen, N. A., Huss, D., & Anderson, J. R. (2008). The acquisition of robust and flexible cognitive skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 137(3), 548–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tiellet, C. A. B., Pereira, A. G., Reategui, E. B., Lima, J. V., & Chambel, T. Design and Evaluation of a Hypervideo Environment to Support Veterinary Surgery Learning. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2010 (pp. 213–222): ACMGoogle Scholar
  82. Tripp, T., & Rich, P. J. (2012). The influence of video analysis on the process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 728–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tynjälä, P. (2008). Perspectives into learning at the workplace. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 130–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Van Lehn, K. (1999). Rule-learning events in the acquisition of a complex skill: an evaluation of CASCADE. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(1), 71–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Van Merriënboer, J. (1997). Training Complex Cognitive Skills: A four-component instructional design model for technical training. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  86. Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2010). Ten Steps to Complex Learning. A Systematic Approach to Four-Component Instructional Design. New York: Routledge, Taylor&Francis Group.Google Scholar
  87. Wuttke, E., & Seifried, J. (Eds.) (2012). Learning from errors at school and at work. Opladen, Berlin & Farmington Hills, MI: Verlag Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
  88. Zahn, C., Pea, R., Hesse, F. W., & Rosen, J. (2010). Comparing simple and advanced video tools as supports for complex collaborative design processes. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(3), 403–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Swiss Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training (EHB-IFFP-IUFFP)LuganoSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations