Abstract
This study reports on the development of a self-reported measurement instrument – The Teacher Educators’ Researcherly Disposition Scale (TERDS) – to improve understanding of teacher educators’ researcherly disposition. Teacher educators’ researcherly disposition refers to the habit of mind to engage with research – both as consumers and producers – to improve their practice and contribute to the knowledge base on teacher education. Taking into account the shortcomings of the emerging field of teacher educator professional development research (which is largely confined to small-scale, qualitative studies), a large-scale quantitative survey study (n = 944) was conducted. The first part of the article reports the results of factor analysis (EFA and CFA), which suggest a four-factor structure of teacher educators’ researcherly disposition: (1) ‘valuing research’ (α = .86), (2) ‘being a smart consumer of research’ (α = .89), (3) ‘being able to conduct research’ (α = .82), and (4) ‘conducting research’ (α = .87). Goodness of fit estimates were calculated, indicating good fit. The second part of the article explores differences in teacher educators’ researcherly disposition across several subgroups of teacher educators using the developed instrument. Results indicate that having research experience leads to significantly higher scores on each of the subscales. Furthermore, significantly higher scores were found for those with more than 3 years’ experience as a teacher educator, as well as for those without (prior) teaching experience in compulsory education. To conclude, the implications for further research and practices related to teacher educators’ professional development are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
APA NCME Aera. (2015). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington: American Educational Research Association.
Bates, T., Swennen, A., & Jones, K. (2011). The Professional Development of Teacher Educators. Abingdon: Routledge.
Berry, A. (2007). Tensions in Teaching about Teaching: Understanding Practices as a Teacher Educator. Dordrecht: Springer.
Berry, A. (2013). Teacher educators’ professional learning: A necessary case of “on your own”? Paper presented at the International Study Association of Teachers and Teaching (ISATT), Ghent, Belgium, 1-5 July.
Billett, S. (2005). Being competent: the relational interdependence between individual and social agency in working life. In Gruber, H., Harteis, C., Mulder, R., & Rehrl, M. (Eds.), Bridging individual, organisational, and cultural perspectives on professional learning (pp.113–132). Regensburg: Germany Roderer.
Billet, S. (2008). Subjectivity, learning and work: sources & legacies. Vocations and Learning, 1(1), 149–177.
Bruggink, M., & Harinck, F. (2012). De onderzoekende houding van leraren: wat wordt daaronder verstaan? [Teachers’ Inquiry Habit of Mind: What does this Mean?]. Tijdschrift voor Lerarenopleiders (VELON/VELOV), 33(3), 46–53.
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.
Cochran-Smith, M. (2005). Teacher educators as researchers: multiple perspectives. Teaching Teachers, 21(2), 219–225.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2009). Inquiry as stance: practitioner research for the next generation. New York: Teacher College Press.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. M. (2005). Executive Summary: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying Teacher Education (pp. 1–36). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cole, D. A., Ciesla, J. A., & Steiger, J. H. (2007). The insidious effects of failing to include design-driven correlated residuals in latent-variable covariance structure analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(4), 381–398.
Cranton, P. (2002). Teaching for transformation. In J.M. Ross-Gordon (Ed.), New directions for adult and continuing education: No. 93. Contemporary viewpoints on teaching adults effectively (pp. 63–71). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.
European Commission. (2013). Supporting Teacher Educators. Brussels: EC.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Uppersaddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall
Hamilton, M. L., & Clandinin, D. J. (2011). Unpacking our assumptions about teacher educators around the world. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 243–244.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
Kane, M. T. (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(1), 1–73. doi:10.1111/jedm.12000.
Katz, L. G., & Raths, J. D. (1985). Dispositions as goals for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 1(4), 301–307.
Lanier, J. E., & Little, W. J. (1986). Research on Teacher Education. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (pp. 527–569). New York: Macmillan.
Loughran, J. (2006). Developing a Pedagogy of Teacher Education. London: Routledge.
Loughran, J. (2014). Professionally developing as a teacher educator. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 1–13.
Loughran, J., & Berry, A. (2005). Modelling by teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 193–203.
Lunenberg, M., Dengerink, J., & Korthagen, F. (2014). The professional teacher educator: Professional roles, behaviour and development of teacher educators. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. In P. Cranton (Ed.), New directions for adult and continuing education: No. 74. Transformative learning in action: Insights from practice (pp. 5–12). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Milfont, T. L., & Fischer, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 2011–2084.
Murray, J., & Male, T. (2005). Becoming a teacher educator: evidence from the field. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 125–142.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2011). Mplus User’s Guide (6 th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 396–402.
Perkins, D. N., Jay, E., & Tishman, S. (1993). Beyond abilities: a dispositional theory of thinking. Merill-Palmer Quaterly: Journal of Developmental Psychology, 39(1), 1–21.
Smith, K. (2003). So, what about the professional development of teacher educators? European Journal of Teacher Education, 26(2), 201–215.
Smith, K. (2010). Professional Development of Teacher Educators. In (eds.) (2010). International Encyclopaedia of Education (3 rd ed.), Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Snoek, M., & Zogla, I. (2009). Teacher Education in Europe: Main Characteristics and Development. In A. Swennen & M. van der Klink (Eds.), Becoming a teacher educator: Theory and practice for teacher educators (pp. 11–28). Dordrecht: Springer.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
Tack, H., & Vanderlinde, R. (2014). Teacher educators’ professional development: towards a typology of teacher educators’ researcherly disposition. British Journal of Educational Studies, 62(3), 297–315.
Watson, D. (2000). Lifelong Learning and Professional Higher Education. In T. Bourner, T. Katz, & D. Watson (Eds.), New directions in professional higher education (pp. 3–10). Buckingham: OUP.
Wilson, S. M. (2006). Finding a canon and core: meditations on the preparation of teacher educator-researchers. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 315–325.
Zeichner, K. (2005). Becoming a teacher educator: a personal perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 117–124.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A: Example of TERDS with instructions
Appendix A: Example of TERDS with instructions
In this survey research is defined as ‘the systematic investigation into and study of materials and sources in order to develop (1) knowledge, new theories or answer questions occurring from (2) practice or (3) policy’. Research conducted by teacher educators can be practitioner research, practice-based research, research and development projects, policy-related research and fundamental research.
Answer each of the statements.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tack, H., Vanderlinde, R. Measuring Teacher Educators’ Researcherly Disposition: Item Development and Scale Construction. Vocations and Learning 9, 43–62 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-016-9148-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-016-9148-5