Modern vocational education is increasingly taking place in new technology-enhanced learning (TEL) settings. On the one hand, vocational education can benefit from the opportunities of technological development. On the other hand, such technologies may create new challenges for teachers. Therefore, there is a particular need to pay more attention to the dialogic pedagogical approaches in which teaching should be seen as a dialogical practice involving teacher-student interactions that create contextual opportunities for teachers to trigger students’ learning in new TEL settings. This article reports on an exploratory study about the different ways in which teachers’ instructional activities (via teacher-student interactions) are manifested in different emerging TEL contexts. Three case studies were selected for analysis in three different TEL settings. The results of this qualitative study indicate that ‘teacher-led’ approaches were applied in a technology-enhanced classroom context, ‘teacher-student shared collaboration activities’ were actively used in a virtual 3D-game setting and ‘teacher-student(s)-supervisor(s) joint learning activities’ were used to empower mobile-supported workbased learning. Based on the findings raised from these three empirical studies, future prospects for teachers’ activities that facilitate vocational learning can be developed. Additionally, our findings may be helpful in developing professional tools for teachers to better enable learning in new TEL settings.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Akkerman, S. F., & van Eijck, M. (2013). Re-theorizing the student dialogically across and between boundaries of multiple communities. British Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 60–72. doi:10.1080/01411926.2011.613454.
Alexander, R. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (4th ed.). York: Dialogos.
Attwell, G. (2007). Personal learning environments – the future of eLearning? eLearning papers, 2(1). Retrieved from http://www.elearningeuropa.info/files/media/media11561.pdf.
Bell, T., Urhahne, D., Schanze, S., & Ploetzner, R. (2010). Collaborative inquiry learning: models, tools, and challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 3(1), 349–377.
Boldrini, E., & Cattaneo, A. (2013). Written identification of errors to learn professional procedures in VET. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 65(4), 525–542.
Boldrini, E., Ghisla, G., & Bausch, L. (2014). Didattica per situazioni. In G. P. Quaglino (Ed.), Formazione. I metodi (pp. 337–360). Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
Boyle, T., & Ravenscroft, A. (2012). Context and deep learning design. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1224–1233.
Brown, G. (2014). Reconsidering assessment for learning: Insights from human factors and social conditions. Retrieved from http://earli-sig1-conference.org/gavin-brown.php.
Brown, A., & Campione, J. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 227–270). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Castanheira, M. L., Green, J., & Yaeger, E. (2009). Investigating inclusive practices: An interactional ethnographic approach. In K. Kumpulainen, C. Hmelo-Silver, & M. César (Eds.), Investigating classroom interaction: Methodologies in action (pp. 145–178). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Cattaneo, A., & Aprea, C. (2014). Using technologies to integrate vocational learning in multiple contexts. In V. C. X. Wang (Ed.), Handbook of research on education and technology in a changing society (pp. 675–690). Hershey: IGI-Global.
Cattaneo, A., & Boldrini, E. (2009). Eleven competences for the teacher using ICTs: a quali-quantitative research pattern. In U. Bernath, A. Szűcs, A. Tait, & M. Vidal (Eds.), Distance and E-learning in transition—learning innovation, technology and social challenges (pp. 261–290). London-Hoboken: ISTE – Wiley.
Chatti, M. A. (2010). Personalization in technology enhanced learning: A social software perspective. Shaker Verlag, Dissertation, RWTH Aachen University.
Cuendet, S. & Dillenbourg, P. (2013). The benefits and limitations of distributing a tangible interface in a classroom. In N. Rummel, M. Kapur, M. Nathan, S. Puntambekar (Eds.). To see the world and a grain of sand: Learning across levels of space, time and scale. CSCL2013 conference proceedings. Volume I (pp. 137–144). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Cuendet, S., Dehler Zufferey, J., Arn, C., Bumbacher, E., & Dillenbourg, P. (2014). A study of carpenter apprentices’ spatial skills. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 6(3). doi: 10.1186/s40461-014-0003-3.
Dillenbourg, P. (2013). Design for classroom orchestration. Computers & Education, 69, 485–492.
Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2007). Designing integrative scripts. In F. Fischer, H. Mandl, J. Haake, & I. Kollar (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 275–301). New York: Springer.
Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2010). Technology for classroom orchestration. In M. S. Khine & I. M. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning: Cognition, computers and collaboration in education (pp. 525–552). Dordrecht: Springer.
Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 392–431). New York: Macmillan.
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013). Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 56–66.
Gavota, M., Cattaneo, A., Arn, C., Boldrini, E., Motta, E., Schneider, D. K., & Bétrancourt, M. (2010). Computer-supported peer commenting: a promising instructional method to promote skill development in vocational education. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 62(4), 495–511.
Griffiths, T., & Guile, D. (2003). A connective model of learning: the implications for work process knowledge. European Educational Research Journal, 2(1), 56–73.
Hämäläinen, R. (2011). Using a game environment to foster collaborative learning: a design-based study. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(1), 61–78.
Hämäläinen, R., & De Wever, B. (2013). Vocational education approach: new TEL settings—new prospects for teachers’ instructional activities? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(3), 271–291.
Hämäläinen, R., & Vähäsantanen, K. (2011). Theoretical and pedagogical perspectives on orchestrating creativity and collaborative learning. Educational Research Review, 6(3), 169–184.
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2013). Use of Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 and higher education: the search for evidence-based practice. Educational Research Review, 9, 47–64.
Jones, D. (2007). Speaking, listening, planning and assessing: the teacher’s role in developing metacognitive awareness. Early Child Development and Care, 177(6/7), 569–579.
Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, P., Harrer, A., Hämäläinen, R., Häkkinen, P., et al. (2007). Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2/3), 211–224.
Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. (2006). Computer-supported cooperation scripts—a conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), 159–185.
Lehesvuori, S., Viiri, J., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2011). Introducing dialogic teaching to science student teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(8), 705–727.
Lipponen, L., & Kumpulainen, K. (2011). Acting as accountable authors: creating interactional spaces for agency work in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 812–819.
Ludvigsen, S., Lund, A., Rasmussen, I., & Säljö, R. (Eds.). (2011). Learning across sites. New tools, infrastructures and practices. New York: Routledge.
Mercer, N. (2013). The social brain, language, and goal-directed collective thinking: a social conception of cognition and its implications for understanding how we think, teach, and learn. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 148–168.
Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 367–385.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: toward a shared craft. Educational Researcher, 13, 20–30.
Minnaert, A. M., Boekaerts, M., De Brabander, C., & Opdenakker, M. C. (2011). Students’ experiences of autonomy, competence, social relatedness, and interest within a CSCL environment in vocational education: the case of commerce and business administration. Vocations and Learning, 4(3), 175–190.
Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in science classrooms. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
OECD. (2012). Literacy, numeracy and problem solving in technology-rich environments: framework for the OECD survey of adult skills. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264128859-en.
Onrubia, J., & Engel, A. (2012). The role of teacher assistance on the effects of a macro-script in collaborative writing tasks. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(1), 161–186.
Pachler, N., Pimmer, C., & Seipold, J. (Eds.). (2011). Work-based mobile learning. Concepts and cases. Bern: Peter Lang.
Rojas-Drummond, S., Littleton, K., Hernández, F., & Zúniga, M. (2010). Dialogical interactions among peers in collaborative writing contexts. In K. Littleton & C. Howe (Eds.), Educational dialogues: Understanding and promoting productive interaction (pp. 128–148). Abingdon: Routledge.
Schaap, H., Baartman, L., & de Bruijn, E. (2012). Students’ learning processes during school-based learning and workplace learning in vocational education: a review. Vocations and Learning, 5(2), 99–117.
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Schmid, R. F., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Tamim, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Surkes, M. A., & Woods, J. (2014). The effects of technology use in postsecondary education: a meta-analysis of classroom applications. Computers & Education, 72, 271–291.
Schwendimann, B., Cattaneo, A., Dehler Zufferey, J., Bétrancourt, M., Gurtner, J.-L., & Dillenbourg, P. (2015). The ‘Erfahrraum’: A model for exploiting educational technologies in dual vocational systems. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2007). A theory of learning for the mobile age. In R. Andrews & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of e-learning research (pp. 221–247). London: Sage.
Vähäsantanen, K., & Eteläpelto, A. (2009). Vocational teachers in the face of a major educational reform: individual ways of negotiating professional identities. Journal of Education and Work, 22(1), 15–33.
Van der Zande, P., Akkerman, S., Brekelmans, M., Waarlo, A., & Vermunt, J. (2012). Expertise for teaching biology situated in the context of genetic testing. International Journal of Science Education, 34(11), 1741–1767.
Vosniadou, S. I., Ioannides, C., Dimitrakopoulou, A., & Papademetriou, E. (2001). Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learning and Instruction, 11(4), 281–419.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Warwick, P., Hennessy, S., & Mercer, N. (2011). Promoting teacher and school development through co-enquiry: developing interactive whiteboard use in a ‘dialogic classroom’. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 17(3), 303–324.
Webb, N. (2009). The teacher’s role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 1–28.
Wegerif, R. (2007). Dialogic, education and technology: Expanding the space of learning. New York: Springer.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
This research was supported by the Academy of Finland (Project 258659) and by the State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI) within the activities planned by the Leading House “Technologies for Vocational Training” (Dual-T project, BB.2009.0175). We would thank Elisa Motta, Kimmo Oksanen and Kati Laine, for their precious contribution in conducting the studies.
About this article
Cite this article
Hämäläinen, R., Cattaneo, A. New TEL Environments for Vocational Education – Teacher’s Instructional Perspective. Vocations and Learning 8, 135–157 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-015-9128-1
- Vocational education
- Technology-enhanced learning
- Teacher’s instructional activities
- 3D -games
- Mobile-supported learning
- Qualitative study